A Prospective Randomized Comparison of a Single Antibiotic (Moxalactam) Versus Combination Therapy (Gentamicin and Clindamycin) in Penetrating Abdominal Trauma

From July 1 to December 31, 1983, 50 consecutive patients undergoing abdominal exploration for penetrating abdominal trauma from stab and gunshot wounds were prospectively randomized to receive postinjury, preoperative antibiotic coverage with moxalactam (2 g intravenously every 12 hours) or a combination of gentamicin (3 to 5 mg/kg/day in three equal doses administered every eight hours) and clindamycin (600 mg intravenously every six hours). No intraabdominal abscesses or wound infections developed, and no direct evidence of toxicity of the antibiotic regimens developed in either group. In the study group, moxalactam therapy was an effective alternative to the combination antibiotic regimen. The subsequently documented incidence of moxalactam-induced bleeding episodes precludes its use as a primary preventive antibiotic; however, other less toxic cephalosporins may demonstrate similar effectiveness

Phase 2 study of aficamten in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Background: Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction is a major determinant of heart failure symptoms in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM). Aficamten, a next-in-class cardiac myosin inhibitor, may lower gradients and improve symptoms in these patients. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of aficamten in patients with oHCM. Methods: Patients with oHCM and LVOT gradients ≥30 mm Hg at rest or ≥50 mm Hg with Valsalva were randomized 2:1 to receive aficamten (n = 28) or placebo (n = 13) in 2 dose-finding cohorts. Doses were titrated based on gradients and ejection fraction (EF). Safety and changes in gradient, EF, New York Heart Association functional class, and cardiac biomarkers were assessed over a 10-week treatment period and after a 2-week washout. Results: From baseline to 10 weeks, aficamten reduced gradients at rest (mean difference: −40 ± 27 mm Hg, and −43 ± 37 mm Hg in Cohorts 1 and 2, P = 0.0003 and P = 0.0004 vs placebo, respectively) and with Valsalva (−36 ± 27 mm Hg and −53 ± 44 mm Hg, P = 0.001 and <0.0001 vs placebo, respectively). There were modest reductions in EF (−6% ± 7.5% and −12% ± 5.9%, P = 0.007 and P < 0.0001 vs placebo, respectively). Symptomatic improvement in ≥1 New York Heart Association functional class was observed in 31% on placebo, and 43% and 64% on aficamten in Cohorts 1 and 2, respectively (nonsignificant). With aficamten, N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide was reduced (62% relative to placebo, P = 0.0002). There were no treatment interruptions and adverse events were similar between treatment arms. Conclusions: Aficamten resulted in substantial reductions in LVOT gradients with most patients experiencing improvement in biomarkers and symptoms. These results highlight the potential of sarcomere-targeted therapy for treatment of oHCM

Efficacy and safety of aficamten in symptomatic non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: results from the REDWOOD-HCM trial, cohort 4

Background This open-label phase 2 trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of aficamten in patients with nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (nHCM). Methods Patients with symptomatic nHCM (left ventricular outflow tract obstruction gradient ≤ 30 mmHg, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≥ 60%, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP] > 300 pg/mL) received aficamten 5–15 mg once daily (doses adjusted according to echocardiographic LVEF) for 10 weeks. Results We enrolled 41 patients (mean ± SD age 56 ± 16 years; 59% female). At Week 10, 22 (55%) patients experienced an improvement of ≥ 1 New York Heart Association class; 11 (29%) became asymptomatic. Clinically relevant improvements in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Scores occurred in 22 (55%) patients. Symptom relief was paralleled by reductions in NT-proBNP levels (56%; P < 0.001) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (22%; P < 0.005). Modest reductions in LVEF (mean ± SD) of −5.4% ± 10 to 64.6% ± 9.1 were observed. Three (8%) patients had asymptomatic reduction in LVEF < 50% (range: 41%–48%), all returning to normal after 2 weeks of washout. One patient with prior history of aborted sudden cardiac death experienced a fatal arrhythmia during the study. Conclusions Aficamten administration for symptomatic nHCM was generally safe and was associated with improvements in heart failure symptoms and cardiac biomarkers