18 research outputs found
Example stimuli from the nonverbal subtask (real and made-up objects) and the verbal subtask (real and made-up words).
<p>Example stimuli from the nonverbal subtask (real and made-up objects) and the verbal subtask (real and made-up words).</p
Encoding accuracy in the Nonverbal and Verbal subtasks.
<p>Encoding accuracy in the Nonverbal and Verbal subtasks.</p
Recognition and retention accuracy for nonverbal information.
<p>Recognition and retention accuracy for nonverbal information.</p
Nonverbal subtask performance by Group (SLI vs. TD) and Real/Novel, showing mean <i>d</i>’ scores and standard errors.
<p>Nonverbal subtask performance by Group (SLI vs. TD) and Real/Novel, showing mean <i>d</i>’ scores and standard errors.</p
A trial of the visuo-spatial cueing paradigm.
<p>A trial of the visuo-spatial cueing paradigm.</p
Mean differences, standard errors and Bayes Factors (B) for the comparison of TD children against each deficit group for the letter and the symbol tasks.
<p>Mean differences, standard errors and Bayes Factors (B) for the comparison of TD children against each deficit group for the letter and the symbol tasks.</p
zRTs for poor spellers (S-), adequate spellers (S+) and controls on valid and invalid trials.
<p>Bars represent standard errors.</p
A trial from the VAS task with letters.
<p>A trial from the VAS task with letters.</p
The <i>d’</i> of the letter task is shown as a function of position for the three groups.
<p>Bars represent standard errors.</p
Mean RTs (<i>M</i>) and standard deviations (<i>SD</i>) for each experimental condition of the visuo-spatial cueing paradigm in the four groups.
<p>Mean RTs (<i>M</i>) and standard deviations (<i>SD</i>) for each experimental condition of the visuo-spatial cueing paradigm in the four groups.</p