3 research outputs found

    A retrospective review of pain management in Tasmanian residential aged care facilities

    Get PDF
    Background: The management of pain by GPs for residents of aged care facilities (ACFs) is very common. Aim: To measure the prevalence and assess the management of pain in ACF residents, particularly those with dementia. Design & setting: A retrospective review of ACF residents’ medical records was undertaken at five southern Tasmanian (Australia) ACFs. Method: Data extracted included results of the most recent assessment of pain and its management, frequency and treatment of pain incidents in the previous 7 days, demographics, and medical and medication history. Univariate analysis was used to identify variables associated with increased frequency of pain episodes. Results: The final analysis included 477 residents. At least one episode of pain in the preceding 7 days was documented in 25.6% (n = 122) of residents' notes. Pain episodes were most commonly managed by analgesics (45.5%), massage (40.7%), and heatpacks (13.8%). Residents with dementia were not less likely to have pain identified during the past week (14% versus 20%; P = 0.09), but they were much less likely to have pain identified on their most recent pain assessment (P = 0.03). Conclusion: GPs should carefully consider the suitability of using ‘as required’ analgesics. Furthermore, on admission to an ACF, GPs need to ensure a patient’s medical history includes all pain or potentially pain-causing conditions, to ensure that a resident’s pain assessment is complete. This is especially necessary for those with dementia, to ensure that staff remain vigilant about the possibility of the resident experiencing pain

    Maternal Antibiotic Exposure and the Risk of Developing Antenatal Depressive Symptoms

    No full text
    Background: Antenatal depression is common and has significant consequences. The literature suggests that antibiotic exposure may be associated with depression. Many individuals are exposed to antibiotics during pregnancy. Further investigation of the association between antenatal antibiotic use and the development of depression during pregnancy is needed. Methods: A national prospective observational cohort study of pregnant individuals was undertaken using an online survey, completed during the third trimester. Antenatal depressive symptoms (ADSs) were defined as having an Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score of ≥13 and/or receiving a clinical diagnosis of depression. Results: One in six individuals (16.5%, n = 977) experienced ADSs during their pregnancy, of whom 37.9% received a depression diagnosis. There was no relationship between antibiotic use and the development of ADSs. Four factors were identified as significant independent predictors of ADSs: personal history of depression, severe nausea and vomiting causing an inability to eat, emotional abuse from an intimate partner within the prior 12 months, and not having a university degree. Conclusions: Antenatal antibiotic use was not associated with the development of ADSs. Given the high incidence of undiagnosed depression, new strategies and models of care that prioritise individuals with risk factors may be required to optimise antenatal care
    corecore