The bare minimum of information at discharge after acute coronary syndrome. Part 2: the quality improvement project

An Acute Coronary Syndrome is a fine example of the communicative difficulties that precede and characterize hospital discharge. In recent years, due to the rapid changes in therapeutic approaches, hospitalizations have become extremely brief. This entails the risk of inadequate information at discharge, significantly affecting the quality of treatment compliance and the adoption of lifestyle modifications for an effective secondary prevention. There are a series of issues that the health practitioner should cover at discharge with the patient and family members: history of disease and prognosis, risk factors and strategies for their control, aims of treatment, instructions on drugs, diet and physical activity, need for medical check-up; and, last but not least, to verify that the information has been understood. Information on drug treatment is all too often left to patient's interpretation of hearsay or of the discharge letter, the new drug regime can easily be misunderstood or arbitrarily integrated into pre-existing drug regimes. Health practitioners must discuss issues, regardless of whether they are asked direct questions; and they should verify what imparted information has been correctly understood and assimilated. A rapid turn-over is crucial to the organization of acute units, therefore we need to identify a solution that ticks all the boxes of a good discharge in a reasonably brief time. Imparting information should be an integral component of care delivery, and the responsible practitioners (doctors and/or nurses) should be identified. We propose a standardized discharge form, containing the essential information, as a point of reference to be applied in different clinical settings

Omega-3 fatty acids after myocardial infarction. News for prescription

Not availabl

Cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation in the elderly: evidence for cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction or chronic heart failure.

Cardiac rehabilitation in the elderly today often represents a utopia. The international scientific literature takes little into account this type of prescription for old people, although they represent a large and growing proportion of cardiac patients, with acute coronary syndrome or heart failure, which we have to manage in everyday life. Furthermore, interventions of health education, clinical follow up, rehospitalisation prevention and prescription of tailored exercise, are sometimes more necessary in this kind of patients, given the presence of multimorbidity, functional dependence, frailty, sarcopenia, social neglect. Most of the data on the feasibility, safety and efficacy of cardiac rehabilitation are favourable, but they are few and apparently not strong enough to convince the medical community. Therefore is necessary to join efforts to identify the geriatric patient's peculiarities and plan a suitable program of cardiac rehabilitation, which takes into account the multi-dimensionality and complexity of typical problems of the elderly, for which the classical cardiac outcomes can be limited.RiassuntoLa riabilitazione cardiologica nel paziente anziano rappresenta ad oggi in molte realtà una utopia. La letteratura scientifica internazionale prende poco in considerazione questo tipo di prescrizione nei soggetti in età avanzata, per quanto essi rappresentino una grande e crescente quota dei pazienti cardiopatici con sindrome coronarica acuta o scompenso cardiaco. Inoltre proprio su questa tipologia di pazienti interventi di educazione sanitaria, monitoraggio clinico e prescrizione di esercizio fisico personalizzato, risultano più necessari, data la presenza di multimorbilità, dipendenza funzionale, fragilità, sarcopenia, isolamento sociale. La maggior parte dei dati su fattibilità, sicurezza ed efficacia della riabilitazione cardiologica dopo infarto miocardico e nello scompenso sono favorevoli, ma risultano limitati nella numerosità delle casistiche e non condotti su pazienti assimilabili a quelli del mondo reale. E' necessario dunque identificare le peculiarità del paziente geriatrico e pianificare e personalizzare un programma di riabilitazione cardiologica che tenga in considerazione la multidimensionalità e la complessità dei problemi tipici del soggetto anziano, per il quale gli outcome cardiologici abituali possono risultare limitati o non significativi.</p

[The bare minimum of information at discharge after acute coronary syndrome. Part 1: Factors that affect communication].

Hospital discharge after an Acute Coronary Syndrome represents a potential pitfall for patients. Strict adherence to discharge instructions is sometimes essential for recovery and prevention of complications and patients' knowledge of diagnosis and treatment plan is an integral component of patient education. Discharge communication is an integral part of high-quality, patient-centered care but patients leaving hospital often fail to understand important elements of their discharge and home care plan. This paper describes the existing literature on patient understanding and implementation of discharge instructions, discusses previous interventions aimed at improving the discharge process, and recommends best practices

preoperative evaluation before non cardiac surgery in subjects older than 65 years

Non cardiac surgery is becoming increasingly common in elderly patients; they are usually affected by overt cardiac disease or show multiple risk factors, responsible for a higher incidence of perioperative fatal or nonfatal cardiac events. Of interest, acute myocardial infarction occurring in the perioperative period shows a high mortality rate in people over 65 years old. The cardiovascular risk stratification and perioperative management of subjects undergoing noncardiac surgery have been recently updated in the 2014 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines. However, several critical points still lack of strong evidence and are based on expert opinions only. For example, the use of drugs, such as betablockers, before, during and after the surgery, presents many uncertainties regarding the selection of patients more likely to benefit, dosage and duration of therapy, and effects on outcome. Data on elderly patients undergoing non cardiac surgery are scarce. Accordingly, a prospective registry enrolling a large number of aged subjects undergoing non cardiac surgery (particularly at high or intermediate risk) should be able to give us adequate insights on the management strategies currently used, on the incidence of death or cardiovascular events in the postoperative period and on the areas of potential improvement in care. Furthermore, the effects on outcome of structured programs of Guidelines implementation in the clinical practice of cardiologists, anesthesiologists and other health personnel involved in perioperative care, could be positive and should be evaluated

Clinical Characteristics and Course of Patients Entering Cardiac Rehabilitation with Chronic Kidney Disease: Data from the Italian Survey on Cardiac Rehabilitation

This survey shows the clinical risk profile, resource utilization, pharmacologic treatment, and course of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Data from 165 CR units in Italy were collected online from January 28 to February 10, 2008. The study cohort consisted of 2281 patients: 200 CKD patients and 2081 non-CKD patients. CKD patients were older and showed more comorbidity and complications during CR, a more complex clinical course and interventions with less functional evaluation, and a different pattern of drug therapy at hospital discharge. CKD patients had higher mortality during CR programs due to heart failure, respiratory insufficiency, and cognitive impairment. These findings suggest that patients with CKD should not be denied access to CR, provided careful attention to clinical status, possible complications, optimization of drug therapy, and close followup