COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF EFFICACY AND DURABILITY OF SELF-CURE AND LIGHT-CURE DESENSITIZING AGENTS IN THE TREATMENT OF DENTIN HYPERSENSITIVITY- AN IN-VIVO STUDY

<p><strong>Objectives:</strong>This in vivo study aimed to compare the efficacy and durability of three different varnishes/Desensitizing agents. Fluoride varnish, self-cure varnish, and light-cure varnish were used to treat dentin hypersensitivity by blocking dentinal tubules.</p><p><strong>Materials and Methods:</strong> A total of 60 patients were randomly assigned into three groups Group A: received desensitizing fluoride varnish (ProfluoridVarnish, Voco), Group B: received self-cure varnish (Systemp desensitizer, IvoclarVivadent) and Group C: received light-cure varnish (Admira Protect, Voco). Assessment of air and tactile sensitivity was done based on visual analogue scale scores at baseline, immediately after treatment, and one-monthpost-treatment. One-way ANOVA was used to assess the level of significance.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong>The results showed there was no statistically significant difference in the VAS scores for tactile and evaporative stimuli between the three groups immediately after treatment. Group C – Admira Protect showed lesser mean VAS scores for both the stimuli immediately and after 30 days of application which was statistically significant with post hoc correction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong>Allthree varnishes were effective in treating DH immediately after a single application. Profluorid Varnish showed lessefficacy when compared to resin varnishes at the end of one month. Clinical effectiveness was less at the end of one month for Systemp desensitizer, a self-cure varnish when compared to Admira Protect a light cure varnish.</p><p> </p&gt