25 research outputs found

    Performance Style Notes and Comments II Looking Back and Moving Forward in Psychology

    No full text
    Abstract. My point of departure is Mills ’ proposal that we should break with existing research paradigms in psychology. Traditional psychology is deterministic and assumes (efficient) causation; a second, ‘normative’, psychology is evolving with an emphasis on meaning and context. Narrative is a shared focus of normative psychology and literature. Normative psychology facilitates the achievement of predictability, as well as universals, in accounts of thought and action. Key Words: causation, literature, narratives, normative psychology, performance The relationship between psychology and literature can usefully be conceptualized in three broad categories, varying in levels of abstraction: this is the framework for my earlier discussion on psychology and literature (Moghaddam, 2004). At the lowest level of abstraction is ‘psychology in literature’: literature as a source of psychological data, literature as a source of insights for psychology. The second level of abstraction involves literatur

    Post-Tragedy 'Opportunity-bubble' and the Prospect of Citizen Engagement

    Get PDF
    This article appeared in Homeland Security Affairs (September 2011), v.7 no.2From the journal's abstract for this article: "Fathali Moghaddam and James Breckenridge examine the 'opportunity-bubble' that allows leaders to mobilize the public immediately following a tragic event. 'Although great crisis will inevitably invite consideration of many alternatives, leadership must pay special attention to opportunities to engage the public as capable partners in their country's response to the crisis -- calling upon them as citizens with civic duties, as well as rights.'"Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited

    The New Global American Dilemma and Terrorism

    No full text
    The "New Global American Dilemma" and Terrorism Psychological research on terrorism suffers from two main weaknesses, both of which arise from well known weaknesses in mainstream psychology Psychology journals have produced mountains of "data" about individual difference measures, and particularly since 9/11 we are drowning in oceans of information about terrorists (there is now an international "terrorism studies industry" generating more data than anyone can possibly keep up with); what we lack are conceptual frameworks powerful enough to interpret this information. The concept of significance quest, "an overarching motive propelling suicide terrorism" (Kruglanski, Chen, Deshesne, Fishman, & Orehek, 2009, p. 335), is integrative and potentially very useful in helping us interpret some of the information being accumulated on terrorism. A second weakness of mainstream psychology is a tendency for researchers to split into "dispositional" and "contextual" camps, each camp supporting a competing picture of behavior as shaped by individual differences or contextual factors. Underlying this debate is the assumption that the contribution of dispositional and contextual factors is fixed. An alternative and more accurate viewpoint is to treat the role of both dispositional and contextual factors as variable. The role of cultural context in shaping individual behavior is not static; rather, this rol

    Editorial.

    No full text

    Editorial.

    No full text

    The meaning of multiculturalism for visible minority immigrant women.

    No full text

    Toward a psychology of revolution

    No full text

    Psychology is social: exploring universals in performance capacity and performance style

    No full text
    Our goal in this discussion is to map out a scientifically legitimate and practical path toward internationalizing the social psychology curriculum. Toward developing an appropriate conceptual framework, we distinguish between the study of two different types of performance: performance capacity, how well isolated individuals can perform tasks as determined by<br />their physical characteristics, and performance style, the way things are done through collaborative meaning making. Whereas performance capacity can be explained causally, performance style is best explained through normative accounts. Social psychology has largely approached<br />questions of performance style by applying a reductionist and causal framework. We highlight the alternative approach reflected in the cultural-narrative turn and identify<br />sub-research areas that need to be strengthened in order to internationalize psychology. -- La psicología es social: explorando universales en la capacidad y el estilo del desempeño Nuestro objetivo es proponer un camino científicamente legítimo y práctico hacia la internacionalización<br />del currículo de la psicología social. Al desarrollar una estructura conceptual apropiada, distinguimos entre el estudio de dos tipos de desempeño: la capacidad de desempeño,<br />es decir, cuán bien los individuos aislados pueden llevar a cabo tareas determinadas por sus características físicas, y el estilo de desempeño, es decir, el modo en que las cosas se<br />realizan a partir de tener un significado colaborativo. Mientras que la capacidad de desempeño puede ser explicada causalmente, el estilo de desempeño es mejor explicado a través de justificaciones narrativas. La psicología social se ha aproximado principalmente a las cuestiones del estilo de desempeño aplicando una estructura reduccionista y causal. Destacamos el enfoque alternativo reflejado en el turno cultural-narrativo e identificamos subáreas de investigación que necesitan ser reforzadas para internacionalizar la psicología
    corecore