41 research outputs found
Occlusion of Regulatory Sequences by Promoter Nucleosomes In Vivo
Nucleosomes are believed to inhibit DNA binding by transcription factors. Theoretical attempts to understand the significance of nucleosomes in gene expression and regulation are based upon this assumption. However, nucleosomal inhibition of transcription factor binding to DNA is not complete. Rather, access to nucleosomal DNA depends on a number of factors, including the stereochemistry of transcription factor-DNA interaction, the in vivo kinetics of thermal fluctuations in nucleosome structure, and the intracellular concentration of the transcription factor. In vitro binding studies must therefore be complemented with in vivo measurements. The inducible PHO5 promoter of yeast has played a prominent role in this discussion. It bears two binding sites for the transcriptional activator Pho4, which at the repressed promoter are positioned within a nucleosome and in the linker region between two nucleosomes, respectively. Earlier studies suggested that the nucleosomal binding site is inaccessible to Pho4 binding in the absence of chromatin remodeling. However, this notion has been challenged by several recent reports. We therefore have reanalyzed transcription factor binding to the PHO5 promoter in vivo, using ‘chromatin endogenous cleavage’ (ChEC). Our results unambiguously demonstrate that nucleosomes effectively interfere with the binding of Pho4 and other critical transcription factors to regulatory sequences of the PHO5 promoter. Our data furthermore suggest that Pho4 recruits the TATA box binding protein to the PHO5 promoter
Adjusting Phenotypes by Noise Control
Genetically identical cells can show phenotypic variability. This is often caused by stochastic events that originate from randomness in biochemical processes involving in gene expression and other extrinsic cellular processes. From an engineering perspective, there have been efforts focused on theory and experiments to control noise levels by perturbing and replacing gene network components. However, systematic methods for noise control are lacking mainly due to the intractable mathematical structure of noise propagation through reaction networks. Here, we provide a numerical analysis method by quantifying the parametric sensitivity of noise characteristics at the level of the linear noise approximation. Our analysis is readily applicable to various types of noise control and to different types of system; for example, we can orthogonally control the mean and noise levels and can control system dynamics such as noisy oscillations. As an illustration we applied our method to HIV and yeast gene expression systems and metabolic networks. The oscillatory signal control was applied to p53 oscillations from DNA damage. Furthermore, we showed that the efficiency of orthogonal control can be enhanced by applying extrinsic noise and feedback. Our noise control analysis can be applied to any stochastic model belonging to continuous time Markovian systems such as biological and chemical reaction systems, and even computer and social networks. We anticipate the proposed analysis to be a useful tool for designing and controlling synthetic gene networks
Recruitment of the NuA4 complex poises the PHO5 promoter for chromatin remodeling and activation
The remodeling of the promoter chromatin structure is a key event for the induction of the PHO5 gene. Two DNA-binding proteins Pho2 and Pho4 are critical for this step. We found that the NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complex is essential for PHO5 transcriptional induction without affecting Pho4 translocation upon phosphate starvation. Our data also indicate that NuA4 is critical for the chromatin remodeling event that occurs over the PHO5 promoter prior to activation. Using Chromatin IP analysis, we found that Esa1-dependent histone H4 acetylation at the PHO5 promoter correlates with specific recruitment of the NuA4 complex to this locus under repressing conditions. We demonstrate that the homeodomain transcriptional activator Pho2 is responsible for this recruitment in vivo and interacts directly with the NuA4 complex. Finally, we show that Pho4 is unable to bind the PHO5 promoter without prior action of NuA4. These results indicate that, before induction, NuA4 complex recruitment by Pho2 is an essential event that presets the PHO5 promoter for subsequent binding by Pho4, chromatin remodeling and transcription
Requirements for Chromatin Modulation and Transcription Activation by the Pho4 Acidic Activation Domain
The Reception of Matthew 27:19B (Pilate's Wife's Dream) in the Early Church
The mysterious dream of Pilate’s wife and its recounting to her husband
(Matthew 27:19b) occupies a significant place in discussions on Pilate’s guilt. The
present article aims to investigate the reception of this text by the early church.
Special attention is paid to the early commentators’ views on the possible link
between the dream of Pilate’s wife and Pilate’s guilt, as this is an ambiguity in
the Matthean text. Another uncertainty in the Matthean text concerns the story’s
chronology. The early commentators’ views on this matter are also examined.
Lastly, the varied ways of applying this text in new contexts are investigated.http://journals.sabinet.co.za/ej/ejour_patris.htmlam201
Histone H3 Lysine 4 Hypermethylation Prevents Aberrant Nucleosome Remodeling at the PHO5 Promoter â–¿
Recent studies have highlighted the histone H3K4 methylation (H3K4me)-dependent transcriptional repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae; however, the underlying mechanism remains inexplicit. Here, we report that H3K4me inhibits the basal PHO5 transcription under high-phosphate conditions by suppressing nucleosome disassembly at the promoter. We found that derepression of the PHO5 promoter by SET1 deletion resulted in a labile chromatin structure, allowing more binding of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) but not the transactivators Pho2 and Pho4. We further showed that Pho23 and Cti6, two plant homeodomain (PHD)-containing proteins, cooperatively anchored the large Rpd3 (Rpd3L) complex to the H3K4-methylated PHO5 promoter. The deacetylation activity of Rpd3 on histone H3 was required for the function of Set1 at the PHO5 promoter. Taken together, our data suggest that Set1-mediated H3K4me suppresses nucleosome remodeling at the PHO5 promoter so as to reduce basal transcription of PHO5 under repressive conditions. We propose that the restriction of aberrant nucleosome remodeling contributes to strict control of gene transcription by the transactivators