Population pharmacokinetics of liposomal irinotecan in patients with cancer and exposure–safety analyses in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

Pharmacokinetics; Liposomal irinotecan; SafetyFarmacocinética; Irinotecán liposomal; SeguridadFarmacocinètica; Irinotecan liposomal; SeguretatLiposomal irinotecan is a liposomal formulation of irinotecan, which prolongs circulation of irinotecan and its active metabolite SN-38. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed based on data from seven studies (N = 440). Adequacy of the model was assessed using multiple methods, including visual predictive check. Associations between PK exposure and the incidence of diarrhea (grade ≥3) and neutropenia adverse events (AEs) (grade ≥3) at first event in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) were investigated using logistic regression based on data from two studies (the phase III NAPOLI-1 [N = 260] and phase I/II NCT02551991 [N = 56] trials). The PKs of total irinotecan was described by a two-compartment model with first-order elimination, with SN-38 formed directly by a first-order constant from the central compartment of irinotecan or after using a transit compartment. Clearance was 17.9 L/week (0.107 L/h) and 19,800 L/week (118 L/h) for total irinotecan and SN-38, respectively. The UGT1A1*28 7/7 homozygous genotype had no significant impact on SN-38 clearance. Model evaluation was satisfactory for both irinotecan and SN-38. The incidence of diarrhea (grade ≥3) at first event was significantly higher with increasing average concentrations of total irinotecan and SN-38; there was no significant association between an increased risk of neutropenia AEs (grade ≥3) at first event and average SN-38 concentrations. In summary, the PKs of total irinotecan and SN-38 after administration of liposomal irinotecan were well-described by the model. The UGT1A1*28 status had no significant impact on the PKs of liposomal irinotecan

Phase II clinical trial of sequential treatment with systemic chemotherapy and intraperitoneal paclitaxel for gastric and gastroesophageal junction peritoneal carcinomatosis - STOPGAP trial.

BackgroundStudies from Asia indicate that normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (NIPEC) may confer survival benefit in patients with gastric peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). However, data regarding this approach is lacking in western population. The current STOPGAP trial is intended to assess 1-year progression-free survival benefit of sequential systemic chemotherapy and paclitaxel NIPEC in patients with gastric/ gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma PC.MethodsThis is a prospective, single center, single arm, phase II investigator-initiated clinical trial. Patients with histologically proven gastric/GEJ (Siewert 3) adenocarcinoma with positive peritoneal cytology or PC will be eligible to participate after three months of standard of care systemic chemotherapy and with no evidence of visceral metastasis on restaging scans. The primary treatment is iterative paclitaxel NIPEC with systemic paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil, which will be administered on days1 and 8 and repeated every three weeks for 4 cycles. Patients will undergo diagnostic laparoscopy both before and after NIPEC to assess peritoneal cancer index (PCI). Patients with PCI less than or equal to 10 in whom complete cytoreduction (CRS) is feasible may opt to undergo CRS with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The primary endpoint is 1-year progression free survival and secondary endpoints are overall survival and patient reported quality of life outcomes measured by EuroQol- 5 dimensions-5 level (EuroQol-5D-5L) questionnaire.DiscussionIf the sequential approach of systemic chemotherapy followed by paclitaxel NIPEC proves beneficial, then this approach could be used in larger, muti-institutional randomized clinical trial of gastric PC.Trial registrationThe trial was registered on 21/02/2021, under clinical trials.gov; Identifier: NCT04762953

Early Adoption of Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Metastatic Gastric Adenocarcinoma—A Case Series of Non-Operative Long-Term Survivors

Checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy has only recently been introduced in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer. However, later line monotherapy CPI efficacy in a subset of patients was presented about four years prior. Here, we present three cases of advanced gastric adenocarcinoma cancers treated with CPI in early lines years prior to the availability of randomized first line data. All three patients remain in remission without gastrectomy, with the median time from initial diagnosis of approximately 52 months. With long-term follow-up of more than four years, we present a proof of concept that, with early integration of CPI therapy, highly durable responses are possible even in the absence of surgery in patients with advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers

Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is challenging. Several randomized clinical trials are investigating the efficacy of systemic therapy, immunotherapy, and locoregional therapy as monotherapy or combined with other modalities in the treatment of HCC. Systemic therapy is the preferred treatment in advanced disease. To date, multiple first-line and second-line agents received Food and Drug Administration approval. For over a decade, sorafenib was the only first-line agent. In May 2020, combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab has been approved as a first-line systemic regimen. Lenvatinib is another first-line agent that has multikinase activity. Second-line agents include cabozantinib, regorafenib, ramucirumab, and nivolumab. Adoptive cell transfer therapy is a highly specific immunotherapy that has shown antitumor activity against HCC. Oncolytic viruses are genetically modified viruses that infect cancer cells and induce apoptosis. Locoregional therapies such as transarterial chemoembolization and radioembolization have shown a potential benefit in selected patients with advanced HCC. In this review, we aim to summarize the treatment options available for advanced HCC

Durable Response after Repeat Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in a Patient with Extensive Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Appendix

Mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix is a rare form of lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract cancer. These cancers have a high tendency to progress towards peritoneal metastasis and their response to systemic treatment is typically low. Together, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have become an established form of therapy used to prolong the survival of patients with this disease. Repeat CRS and HIPEC have been shown to be feasible in selected patients with GI peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), among which those with appendix cancer receive the greatest benefit. The peritoneal cancer index (PCI) and completeness of cytoreduction have been shown to be important predictors of outcomes. However, repeat cytoreduction in patients with a high-volume peritoneal tumor burden (peritoneal cancer index (PCI) > 30) is not typically performed due to concerns regarding morbidity and mortality. Herein, we describe a case of repeat CRS and HIPEC for extensive appendiceal mucinous peritoneal carcinomatosis after initial incomplete cytoreduction and durable remission of 28 months without adjuvant chemotherapy. In appendiceal mucinous cancers, repeat CRS can achieve a durable response despite an initial failed CRS and high-volume disease

Screening and verification of potential gene targets in esophageal carcinoma by bioinformatics analysis and immunohistochemistry

BackgroundTo evaluate the potential of candidate proteins as diagnostic markers or drug targets in esophageal carcinoma (ESCA).MethodsGSE20347, GSE17351, and GSE45670 were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Differently expressed genes (DEGs) between ESCA and normal esophageal tissues from patients were obtained. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis were performed. The genes commonly featured in ESCA were screened by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression and Boruta feature selection algorithm. The transcriptome data and corresponding clinical data of ESCA were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) public database. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to explore the core genes related to the prognosis of patients. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was generated by GeneMANIA to visualize the functional network between genes. Expressions of CRIP2, FOS, and HOXA10 genes in ESCA cells were verified by immunohistochemistry (IHC).ResultsOut of 11,207 genes, 430 DEGs were identified, including 210 up-regulated genes and 220 down-regulated genes. After taking the intersection of LASSO regression and Boruta algorithm, 15 core genes were identified. Survival analyses demonstrated that low expression of CRIP2 (P=2.643e-02), as well as high expression of FOS (P=4.837e-02) and HOXA10 (P=4.97e-02), was significantly associated with the worse prognosis of ESCA patients. The 3 genes were strongly correlated with the content of immune cells and the stage of tumors. The expression of CRIP2 was correlated with the sensitivity of patients to dasatinib; FOS expression was correlated with the sensitivity of patients to erlotinib, and HOXA10 expression affected the sensitivity of patients to cisplatin, dasatinib, erlotinib, and gefitinib. The cBioportal database showed that 56 patients (31%) had the above core gene mutations: CRIP2 (8%), FOS (10%), and HOXA10 (17%). The IHC showed that there were differences in the expressions of these core genes between ESCA patients and the normal population (P<0.05), with ESCA patients showing higher expression.ConclusionsThe low CRIP2 expression and high expressions of FOS and HOXA10 are associated with more advanced tumor stage, which may have the potential to be novel biomarkers for treatment selection in ESCA

Clinically Meaningful Use of Blood Tumor Markers in Oncology

Before the introduction of modern imaging techniques and the recent developments in molecular diagnosis, tumor markers (TMs) were among the few available diagnostic tools for the management of cancer patients. Easily obtained from serum or plasma samples, TMs are minimally invasive and convenient, and the associated costs are low. Single TMs were traditionally used but these have come under scrutiny due to their low sensitivity and specificity when used, for example, in a screening setting. However, recent research has shown superior performance using a combination of multiple TMs as a panel for assessment, or as part of validated algorithms that also incorporate other clinical factors. In addition, newer TMs have been discovered that have an increased sensitivity and specificity profile for defined malignancies. The aim of this review is to provide a concise overview of the appropriate uses of both traditional and newer TMs and their roles in diagnosis, prognosis, and the monitoring of patients in current clinical practice. We also look at the future direction of TMs and their integration with other diagnostic modalities and other emerging serum based biomarkers, such as circulating nucleic acids, to ultimately advance diagnostic performance and improve patient management

Partial Reversal of Anosmia Following Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in a Patient With Colorectal Adenocarcinoma

Platinum-based chemotherapy is known to cause taste and smell changes (TSCs) via a host of mechanisms, including altered receptor activity, saliva/mucus production, and induction of receptor destruction via mitotic inhibition. In the literature to date, these changes have primarily resulted in worsening of taste and smell. In this case report, we document the first instance of an individual regaining their sense of olfactory detection following treatment with oxaliplatin for colorectal adenocarcinoma. We theorize that the improvement in his sense of smell may have resulted from oxaliplatin-induced destruction of his nasal polyps through the caspase-9/procaspase-9 apoptotic pathway, a pathway shared with other mechanisms of nasal polyp destruction. These findings were supported by nasal endoscopy and sphenoid sinusoscopy, which demonstrated no clinical persistence of nasal polyps, in contrast to nasal endoscopy prior to chemotherapy which demonstrated persistent nasal polyposis. Objective smell testing post-treatment revealed a diminished ability to discriminate odors. Chemotherapy-induced TSCs play a key role in poor weight gain, food aversion, emotional distress, and an overall decrease in quality of life, and patients should be informed of these potential consequences prior to starting treatment. However, in patients with anosmia secondary to nasal polyposis, treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy may provide an additional therapeutic benefit. Further studies may help elucidate the potential therapeutic benefits of these agents in managing steroid-resistant polyposis for patients suffering from olfactory dysfunction