13 research outputs found

    Figure 3

    No full text
    <p>STARD flow diagram of the evaluation study in Vietnam.</p

    Figure 2

    No full text
    <p>Two dipsticks showing typical negative and positive results after being kept for 15 min in diarrhoea stool samples.</p

    Figure 1

    No full text
    <p>Structure of the repeating unit of the O-Ag of <i>Shigella flexneri</i> serotype 2a.</p

    Comparison of four rapid diagnostic tests on randomly-selected serum samples.

    No full text
    <p>NA: Not Applicable.</p>*<p>LR+: Positive Likelihood Ratio – [95% CI].</p>†<p>LR−: Negative Likelihood Ratio – [95% CI].</p>‡<p>DOR: Diagnostic Odds Ratio – [95% CI].</p><p>Sensitivity (%), number of positive rapid diagnostic test among patients with serological evidence (MAT) of leptospirosis (n = 72) – [95% CI].</p><p>Specificity (%), negative rapid diagnostic test among serum samples from patients with no serological evidence (MAT) of leptospirosis (n = 72) – [95% CI].</p

    Comparative predictive values of the Rapid Diagnostic Test and of a commercial test.

    No full text
    <p>Positive and negative predictive values for the diagnosis of leptospirosis using the IgM Rapid Diagnostic Test evaluated in this study and a commercial lateral flow IgM assay were calculated using 72 positive and 72 negative serum specimens randomly selected from New Caledonian specimens.</p
    corecore