The effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on objective and subjective sleep parameters in women with breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction for breast cancer survivors (MBSR(BC)) on multiple measures of objective and subjective sleep parameters among breast cancer survivors (BCS). Methods: Data were collected using a two-armed randomized controlled design among BCS enrolled in either a 6-week MBSR(BC) program or a usual care (UC) group with a 12-week follow-up. The present analysis is a subset of the larger parent trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01177124). Seventy-nine BCS participants (mean age 57 years), stages 0-III, were randomly assigned to either the formal (in-class) 6-week MBSR(BC) program or UC. Subjective sleep parameters (SSP) (i.e., sleep diaries and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)) and objective sleep parameters (OSP) (i.e., actigraphy) were measured at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks after completing the MBSR(BC) or UC program. Results: Results showed indications of a positive effect of MBSR(BC) on OSP at 12 weeks on sleep efficiency (78.2% MBSR(BC) group versus 74.6% UC group, p = 0.04), percent of sleep time (81.0% MBSR(BC) group versus 77.4% UC group, p = 0.02), and less number waking bouts (93.5 in MBSR (BC) group versus 118.6 in the UC group, p < 0.01). Small nonsignificant improvements were found in SSP in the MBSR(BC) group from baseline to 6 weeks (PSQI total score, p = 0.09). No significant relationship was observed between minutes of MBSR(BC) practice and SSP or OSP. Conclusions: These data suggest that MBSR(BC) may be an efficacious treatment to improve objective and subjective sleep parameters in BCS

The Effects of Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction on Objective and Subjective Sleep Parameters in Women with Breast Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction for breast cancer survivors (MBSR(BC)) on multiple measures of objective and subjective sleep parameters among breast cancer survivors (BCS). Methods: Data were collected using a two-armed randomized controlled design among BCS enrolled in either a 6-week MBSR(BC) program or a usual care (UC) group with a 12-week follow-up. The present analysis is a subset of the larger parent trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01177124). Seventy-nine BCS participants (mean age 57 years), stages 0–III, were randomly assigned to either the formal (in-class) 6-week MBSR(BC) program or UC. Subjective sleep parameters (SSP) (i.e., sleep diaries and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)) and objective sleep parameters (OSP) (i.e., actigraphy) were measured at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks after completing the MBSR(BC) or UC program. Results: Results showed indications of a positive effect of MBSR(BC) on OSP at 12 weeks on sleep efficiency (78.2% MBSR(BC) group versus 74.6% UC group, p = 0.04), percent of sleep time (81.0% MBSR(BC) group versus 77.4% UC group, p = 0.02), and less number waking bouts (93.5 in MBSR(BC) group versus 118.6 in the UC group, p \u3c 0.01). Small nonsignificant improvements were found in SSP in the MBSR(BC) group from baseline to 6 weeks (PSQI total score, p = 0.09). No significant relationship was observed between minutes of MBSR(BC) practice and SSP or OSP. Conclusions: These data suggest that MBSR(BC) may be an efficacious treatment to improve objective and subjective sleep parameters in BCS

Baseline Immune Biomarkers as Predictors of MBSR(BC) Treatment Success in Off-Treatment Breast Cancer Patients

Researchers focused on patient-centered medicine are increasingly trying to identify baseline factors that predict treatment success. Because the quantity and function of lymphocyte subsets change during stress, we hypothesized that these subsets would serve as stress markers and therefore predict which breast cancer patients would benefit most from mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR)-facilitated stress relief. The purpose of this study was to assess whether baseline biomarker levels predicted symptom improvement following an MBSR intervention for breast cancer survivors (MBSR[BC]). This randomized controlled trial involved 41 patients assigned to either an MBSR(BC) intervention group or a no-treatment control group. Biomarkers were assessed at baseline, and symptom change was assessed 6 weeks later. Biomarkers included common lymphocyte subsets in the peripheral blood as well as the ability of T cells to become activated and secrete cytokines in response to stimulation with mitogens. Spearman correlations were used to identify univariate relationships between baseline biomarkers and 6-week improvement of symptoms. Next, backward elimination regression models were used to identify the strongest predictors from the univariate analyses. Multiple baseline biomarkers were significantly positively related to 6-week symptom improvement. The regression models identified B-lymphocytes and interferon-γ as the strongest predictors of gastrointestinal improvement (p \u3c .01), +CD4+CD8 as the strongest predictor of cognitive/psychological (CP) improvement (p = .02), and lymphocytes and interleukin (IL)-4 as the strongest predictors of fatigue improvement (p \u3c .01). These results provide preliminary evidence of the potential to use baseline biomarkers as predictors to identify the patients likely to benefit from this intervention

Baseline Immune Biomarkers as Predictors of MBSR(BC) Treatment Success in Off-Treatment Breast Cancer Patients

Researchers focused on patient-centered medicine are increasingly trying to identify baseline factors that predict treatment success. Because the quantity and function of lymphocyte subsets change during stress, we hypothesized that these subsets would serve as stress markers and therefore predict which breast cancer patients would benefit most from mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR)-facilitated stress relief. The purpose of this study was to assess whether baseline biomarker levels predicted symptom improvement following an MBSR intervention for breast cancer survivors (MBSR[BC]). This randomized controlled trial involved 41 patients assigned to either an MBSR(BC) intervention group or a no-treatment control group. Biomarkers were assessed at baseline, and symptom change was assessed 6 weeks later. Biomarkers included common lymphocyte subsets in the peripheral blood as well as the ability of T cells to become activated and secrete cytokines in response to stimulation with mitogens. Spearman correlations were used to identify univariate relationships between baseline biomarkers and 6-week improvement of symptoms. Next, backward elimination regression models were used to identify the strongest predictors from the univariate analyses. Multiple baseline biomarkers were significantly positively related to 6-week symptom improvement. The regression models identified B-lymphocytes and interferon-γ as the strongest predictors of gastrointestinal improvement (p < .01), +CD4+CD8 as the strongest predictor of cognitive/psychological (CP) improvement (p = .02), and lymphocytes and interleukin (IL)-4 as the strongest predictors of fatigue improvement (p < .01). These results provide preliminary evidence of the potential to use baseline biomarkers as predictors to identify the patients likely to benefit from this intervention

Safety and clinical activity of autologous RNA chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in myasthenia gravis (MG-001): a prospective, multicentre, open-label, non-randomised phase 1b/2a study

Summary Background Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are highly effective in treating haematological malignancies, but associated toxicities and the need for lymphodepletion limit their use in people with autoimmune disease. To explore the use of CAR T cells for the treatment of people with autoimmune disease, and to improve their safety, we engineered them with RNA (rCAR-T)—rather than the conventional DNA approach—to target B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) expressed on plasma cells. To test the suitability of our approach, we used rCAR-T to treat individuals with myasthenia gravis, a prototypical autoantibody disease mediated partly by pathogenic plasma cells. Methods MG-001 was a prospective, multicentre, open-label, phase 1b/2a study of Descartes-08, an autologous anti-BCMA rCAR-T therapy, in adults (ie, aged ≥18 years) with generalised myasthenia gravis and a Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score of 6 or higher. The study was done at eight sites (ie, academic medical centres or community neurology clinics) in the USA. Lymphodepletion chemotherapy was not used. In part 1 (phase 1b), participants with Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) disease class III–IV generalised myasthenia gravis received three ascending doses of Descartes-08 to determine a maximum tolerated dose. In part 2 (phase 2a), participants with generalised myasthenia gravis with MGFA disease class II–IV received six doses at the maximum tolerated dose in an outpatient setting. The primary objective was to establish safety and tolerability of Descartes-08; secondary objectives were to assess myasthenia gravis disease severity and biomarkers in participants who received Descartes-08. This trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04146051. Findings We recruited 16 individuals for screening between Jan 7, 2020 and Aug 3, 2022. 14 participants were enrolled (n=3 in part 1, n=11 in part 2). Ten participants were women and four were men. Two individuals did not qualify due to low baseline MG-ADL score (n=1) or lack of generalised disease (n=1). Median follow-up in part 2 was 5 months (range 3–9 months). There was no dose-limiting toxicity, cytokine release syndrome, or neurotoxicity. Common adverse events were headache (six of 14 participants), nausea (five of 14), vomiting (three of 14), and fever (four of 14), which resolved within 24 h of infusion. Fevers were not associated with increased markers of cytokine release syndrome (IL-6, IL-2, and TNF). Mean improvements from baseline to week 12 were –6 (95% CI –9 to –3) for MG-ADL score, –7 (–11 to –3) for Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score, –14 (–19 to –9) for Myasthenia Gravis Composite score, and –9 (–15 to –3) for Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15-revised score. Interpretation In this first study of an rCAR-T therapy in individuals with an autoimmune disease, Descartes-08 appeared to be safe and was well tolerated. Descartes-08 infusions were followed by clinically meaningful decreases on myasthenia gravis severity scales at up to 9 months of follow-up. rCAR-T therapy warrants further investigation as a potential new treatment approach for individuals with myasthenia gravis and other autoimmune diseases. Funding Cartesian Therapeutics and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health