RAPBN 2013 Rasa Pencitraan: Banyak Pemborosan dan Belum Mensejahterakan Rakyat

Pada Tanggal 16 Agustus 2012 Presiden Republik Indonesi, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, menyampaikan Nota Keuangan RAPBN 2013 kepada DPR RI. secar Umum, NK RAPBN 2013 berisikan beberapa hal sebagai berikut. 1. Pendapatan Negara Direncanakan mencapai Rp.1.507,7 triliun, terdiri atas penerimaan perpajakan Rp.1.178,9 triliun, PNPB Rp.324,3 triliun, dan penerimaan hibah Rp.4,5 triliun. 2. Belanja Negara direncanakan sebesar Rp.1.657,9 triliun, terdiri atas belanja pemerintah pusat Rp.1.139 triliun (68,7 persen) dan transfer ke daerah Rp.518,9 triliun (31,2 persen). 3. Pagu anggaran kementerian Negara/Lembaga tahun 2013 sebesar Rp.547,852 triliun, sebanyak Rp.415,718 triliun, di antaranya (75,89 persen) dialokasikan untuk 10 kementrian. 4. Defisit Anggaran diperkirakan sebesar Rp.150,2 triliun, (1,62 persen terhadap PDB). Pembiayaan defisit RAPBN 2013 direncanakan berasal dari sumber-sumber pembiayaan dalam negeri sebesar Rp. 169,6 triliun, dan pembiayaan nuar negeri (neto) sebesar Negatif Rp.19,5 triliun

Reformasi Penganggaran di Indonesia

Sebagian salah satu instrumen ekonomi yang penting, anggaran memiliki peran utama untuk menyejahterakan rakyat. Tata kelola anggaran yang baik menentukan arah kebijakan anggaran dalam mencapai tujuan bernegara. Oleh karenanya, sebagian penada mengembalikan anggaran ketujuannya, Pemerintah pasca reformasi membuat Undang-undang keuangan negara atau dikenal dengan UU No.17 tahun 2003. Ini Adalah UU keuangan Negara yang pertama yang dibuat pemerintah Indonesia sejak kemerdekaan 1945. Sebelom Indonesia menganut sistem keuangan peninggalan Hindia Belanda yaituh, Indische Comptabiliteitswet atau yang lebih dikenal ICW

A Year of Hijacking of Budgets by the Elite, Bypassing Public Welfare: End of Year Notes and Reflections by SEKNAS FITRA on Budget Year 2011

2011 was a year of budget hijacking by Indonesia's political and bureaucratic elite to the detriment of public welfare. An important factor at play in this situation was increasing “budget mafia” activity, evident in corruption cases within the Ministries of Youth & Sport and Labor & Transmigration; and in confirmation of charges against members of the Budget Committee (Banggar) of the House of Representatives (DPR) as accomplices in those cases. This turn of events confirms that Banggar has become a springboard for budget mafia activity. And, this year, hijacking of budgets has taken place in broad daylight with funds from the public purse being openly squandered on activities of benefit to political and bureaucratic leaders. Proposed construction of a new DPR building has a bad smell about it; purchase of a Presidential aircraft makes no sense; burdens of debt weigh more heavily on citizens; and official travel votes have become like feeding troughs for bureaucrats. All of this has amounted to nothing less than a hijacking of the State budget acted out in full public view. Hijacking of Indonesia's budgets continues because of Indonesia's weak law enforcement regime and because budget processes remain closed. Thus, in comparison to the amount spent on corruption eradication, the value of embezzled assets returned to the public purse is modest. The overall situation was made worse by the predilection of public institutions—especially ministries, agencies and political parties—not to be open about budgetary information. This derailing of budgetary funds has had implications for expenditure on education and health—both of which continued to be ineffective. Although government has managed to spend 20% of budgetary resources on education, education budgets have, at the same time, become a dumping ground for all sorts of activities. Moreover, at the central level, education funding is dispersed across 19 ministries and agencies and almost half of it is being appropriated for payment of salaries. Government is also not meeting its legal obligation to spend 5% of budgetary resources on health. It is no surprise, therefore, that Indonesia's Human Development Index (HDI)—which encompasses education and health—declined in 2011. The elite's hijacking of budgets has also led to neglect of public welfare in regions. A principal cause of this has been distortions of the system for fiscal transfers from the central government to regions (known as dana perimbangan). Those distortions have impacted badly on regional budgetary processes. Indeed, it is the fiscal transfers system itself that is acting as a catalyst for increased civil service spending in regions and for promotion of even more fiscal imbalance among regions. Around half of Indonesia's sub-national (regional) governments are appropriating more than 50% of their budgets to fund civil service costs. This situation was made worse by increased levels of misappropriation of regional funds—evident from national Audit Board reports. FITRA's projections and recommendations for 2012 reflect the assessment that budgets for 2012 are unlikely to be very different to those of 2011. Budget processes are still on a business-as-usual footing. Hijacking of budgets by the elite and neglect of public welfare will continue unless government completely revamps current pro-“rent-seeking” budgetary processes. And, as the next general election approaches, budget mafias will peddle their wares even more actively as they become players in political contests. According to FITRA's projections, State budget funding of civil service costs will continue to blow out in 2012 without any improvement of service provided or any diminution in the level of misappropriated funds. 2012 State funding for education will continue to resemble a dumping ground for sundry activities. The legal requirement to spend 5% of budgetary resources on health will, yet again, not be met. And national Audit Board reporting will continue to be little more than an annual ritual that cannot be counted on to improve the quality of budgetary spending. To put a stop to budget mafia operations, budget processes need to be totally revamped. Above all else, budgetary processes need to be open. To achieve that, the Law on State Finances needs to be revised to ensure in particular that it contains specific provisions fleshing out the Constitutional mandate that State budgets “shall be implemented in an open and accountable manner in order to best attain the prosperity of the people”. In addition, corruption eradication efforts should focus on the return of State assets to the public purse by those found guilty of embezzling them. Both the President and the DPR should become agents for change—to make budgets more efficient—and should refrain from deriving personal benefit from State-financed facilities. Revision of the regional fiscal transfers system must also be a priority. That system should squarely focus on realizing fundamental civic rights by reducing per capita fiscal inequalities among regions. The system's policy framework should therefore facilitate more efficient spending on regional civil services and promote greater prosperity for the people

Behind the Glitz of the 2010 Budget

At the end of every year, it is important to reflect upon and evaluate the quality of national budget policies. The National Secretariat of the Indonesian Forum for Budget Transparency (Seknas FITRA), together with its network of budget advocacy units across Indonesia, has consistently provided annual reports on budget performance. Such reports are an important part of its budget transparency work program and its effort to realize popular sovereignty over national budgets 2010 was the first year of President Susilo Bambang Yudoyono (SBY)'s second term of office following his re-election in 2009. In this second term, SBY should be able to be more resolute in his espousal of good budget policies and should not accord any priority to maintaining his political image. The principal emphases in the 2010 State budget (APBN 2010) were that it should promote “national economic recovery and boost community welfare”. But all that turned out to be mere rhetoric. The reality was that the budget was further removed than ever from the mandate of Article 23 of the Consititution that national budgets “shall be implemented in an open and accountable manner in order to best attain the prosperity of the people”. Instead of being used to promote the public interest, 40.7% of the 2010 APBN was consumed by routine expenditure on the bureaucracy and top echelons of the civil service. Furthermore, Rp 162.6 trillion of that 40.7% was spent on civil service costs, Rp 19.5 trillion on official travel and Rp 153.6 trillion on payment of interest on loans or loan repayments

Rancangan Anggaran Pendapatan dan Balanja Negara ” ALTERNATIF”

Pemerintah Telah Mengajukan Rencana Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara 2013 (RAPBN 2013) Sebagai Salah satu Instrumen vital pembangunan nasional, RAPBN 2013 tersebut berisi kerangka ekonomi makro,Pokok-pokok kebijakan fiskal, Kebijakan alokasi Anggaran, dan rincian Program-program yang bakal diselenggarakan sepanjang 2013

Catatan Akhir Tahun 2011 : Tahun Pembajakan Anggaran oleh Elit, Mengabaikan Kesejahteraan Rakyat

Tahun 2011 merupakan tahun pembajakan anggaran oleh elit politik maupun birokrasi, yang berakibat terhadap pengabaian kesejahteraan rakyat. Pembajakan anggaran terjadi dengan semakin terkuaknya praktek mafia anggaran yang dikonfirmasi dari kasus suap di Kemenpora, Kemenakertrans dan penetapan anggota Badan Anggaran sebagai tersangka. Praktek ini mengkonfirmasi badan anggaran menjadi sumber praktek mafia anggaran. Pembajakan anggaran juga dilakukan secara terang-terangan dengan praktek menghamburkan uang rakyat untuk kepentingan elit politik dan birokrasi pada tahun ini. Usulan pembangunan gedung DPR yang mengandung aroma tak sedap, pembelian pesawat Presiden dengan logika sesat dan membebani rakyat dengan hutang, serta belanja perjalanan yang menjadi ajang bancakan birokrasi, menunjukan praktek pembajakan oleh elit dipertontonkan di hadapan publik. Terjadinya pembajakan anggaran secara terus menerus, tidak lain karena lemahnya penegakan hukum dan kondisi penganggaran yang masih tertutup. Efektifitas alokasi anggaran pemberantasan korupsi, menunjukan lemahnya pengembalian asset yang dikorup, tidak sebanding dengan alokasi anggaran untuk pemberantasan korupsi. Kondisi ini diperburuk dengan masih tertutupnya badan publik, khususnya kemneterian/lembaga dan partai politik untuk membuka informasi anggarannya. Akibat pembajakan anggaran ini, berimplikasi terhadap kebijakan anggaran pendidikan dan kesehatan yang masih tidak efektif. Meski pemerintah telah memenuhi 20% anggaran pendidikan, namun yang terjadi anggaran pendidikan menjadi keranjang sampah yang menampung berbagai hal. Di Pusat anggaran pendidikan tersebar di 19 Kementerian/Lembaga, bahkan hampir separuh dari anggaran pendidikan dialokasikan untuk Gaji. Pemerintah juga mempertontonkan pelanggaran UU Kesehatan, dengan tidak memenuhi 5% anggaran kesehatan. Tidak mengherankan, Indeks Pembangunan Manusia Indonesia, yang salah satunya menggunakan indikator pendidikan dan kesehatan mengalami kemunduran. Pembajakan anggaran oleh elit juga menyebabkan kesejahteraan rakyat daerah terabaikan akibat kebijakan dana perimbangan yang distortif dan carut marut praktek penganggaran daerah. Kebijakan dana perimbangan justru memberikan insentif terhadap terjadinya pembengkakan belanja pegawai dan kesenjangan transfer per kapita yang semakin tinggi. Akibatnya, hampir separuh lebih daerah mengalokasikan belanja pegawainya di atas 50% dari APBD-nya. Hal ini diperparah dengan kerugian daerah yang terus mengalami peningkat berdasarkan audit BPK