Crystal Polymorph Control for High-Performance Organic Field-Effect Transistors

Organic molecules are assembled together by weak non-covalent intermolecular interactions in solid state. Multiple crystalline packing states (crystal polymorphism) have commonly existed in the active layer for organic field-effect transistors (OFETs). Different polymorphs, even with the slightest changes in their molecular packing, can differ the charge transport mobility by orders of magnitude. Therefore, accessing new polymorphs can serve as a novel design strategy for attaining high device performance. Here, we review the state of the art in this emerging field of crystal polymorph control. We firstly introduce the role of polymorphism and the methods of polymorph control in organic semiconductors. Then we review the latest studies on the performance of polymorphs in OFET devices. Finally, we discuss the advantages and challenges for polymorphism as a platform for the study of the relationship between molecular packing and charge transport

Is the late near-infrared bump in short-hard GRB 130603B due to the Li-Paczynski kilonova?

Short-hard gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are widely believed to be produced by the merger of two binary compact objects, specifically by two neutron stars or by a neutron star orbiting a black hole. According to the Li-Paczynski kilonova model, the merger would launch sub-relativistic ejecta and a near-infrared/optical transient would then occur, lasting up to days, which is powered by the radioactive decay of heavy elements synthesized in the ejecta. The detection of a late bump using the {\em Hubble Space Telescope} ({\em HST}) in the near-infrared afterglow light curve of the short-hard GRB 130603B is indeed consistent with such a model. However, as shown in this Letter, the limited {\em HST} near-infrared lightcurve behavior can also be interpreted as the synchrotron radiation of the external shock driven by a wide mildly relativistic outflow. In such a scenario, the radio emission is expected to peak with a flux of $\sim 100 \mu$Jy, which is detectable for current radio arrays. Hence, the radio afterglow data can provide complementary evidence on the nature of the bump in GRB 130603B. It is worth noting that good spectroscopy during the bump phase in short-hard bursts can test validity of either model above, analogous to spectroscopy of broad-lined Type Ic supernova in long-soft GRBs.Comment: 4 pages, 2 figures, published in ApJ Lette

The lightcurve of the macronova associated with the long-short burst GRB 060614

The {\it Swift}-detected GRB 060614 was a unique burst that straddles an imaginary divide between long- and short-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), and its physical origin has been heavily debated over the years. Recently, a distinct very-soft F814W-band excess at $t\sim 13.6$ days after the burst was identified in a joint-analysis of VLT and HST optical afterglow data of GRB~060614, which has been interpreted as evidence for an accompanying Li-Paczynski macronova (also called a kilonova). Under the assumption that the afterglow data in the time interval of $1.7-3.0$ days after the burst are due to external forward shock emission, when this assumption is extrapolated to later times it is found that there is an excess of flux in several multi-band photometric observations. This component emerges at $\sim$4 days after the burst, and it may represent the first time that a multi-epoch/band lightcurve of a macronova has been obtained. The macronova associated with GRB 060614 peaked at $t\lesssim 4$ days after the burst, which is significantly earlier than that observed for a supernova associated with a long-duration GRB. Due to the limited data, no strong evidence for a temperature evolution is found. We derive a conservative estimate of the macronova rate of $\sim 16.3^{+16.3}_{-8.2}~{\rm Gpc^{-3}}{\rm yr^{-1}}$, implying a promising prospect for detecting the gravitational wave radiation from compact object mergers by upcoming Advanced LIGO/VIRGO/KAGRA detectors (i.e., the rate is ${\cal R}_{\rm GW} \sim 0.5^{+0.5}_{-0.25}(D/200~{\rm Mpc})^{3}~{\rm yr^{-1}}$).Comment: The version published in ApJL. Fig.1 has been updated, main conclusions are unchange