Orbito-frontal epilepsy masquerading as temporal lobe epilepsy—a case report

AbstractTemporal lobectomy fails to control seizures in a considerable percentage of patients who do not have hippocampal sclerosis. One theoretical reason for failure of surgery is that some of these patients may in fact have extratemporal epilepsy. We present a 28-year-old woman with clinical and scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) evidence of right temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) supported by functional imaging with interictal positron emission tomography (PET) and ictal single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT). An invasive EEG monitoring was prompted by the discovery of a small right orbito-frontal lesion on MRI. Monitoring documented seizure onset at the lesion, with rapid right temporal involvement. The patient was almost seizure-free after a lesionectomy. The index of suspicion of orbito-frontal epilepsy should be high in patients with apparent TLE when the scalp EEG and neuroimaging data are not congruent, or if temporal lobe pathology cannot be identified on structural imaging

Efficacy of once-daily extended-release topiramate (USL255): A subgroup analysis based on the level of treatment resistance

AbstractResults from a previously conducted global phase III study (PREVAIL; NCT01142193) demonstrate the safety and efficacy of once-daily USL255, Qudexy™ XR (topiramate) extended-release capsules, as adjunctive treatment of drug-resistant partial-onset seizures (POSs). In this study, we report a post hoc analysis of PREVAIL data according to patient level of treatment resistance (based upon the number of concomitant antiepileptic drugs [AEDs] and lifetime AEDs) at baseline, with patients defined as either having “highly” drug-resistant seizures (≥2 concurrent AEDs and ≥4 lifetime AEDs) or having “less” drug-resistant seizures (1 concurrent AED or <4 lifetime AEDs) at baseline. For each subgroup, median percent reduction in POS frequency (primary endpoint), responder rate, Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C), and Quality of Life in Epilepsy — Problems (QOLIE-31-P) survey were assessed. Of 249 PREVAIL patients, 115 were classified as having highly drug-resistant seizures (USL255: n=52, placebo: n=63), and 134 were classified as having less drug-resistant seizures (USL255: n=72, placebo: n=62) at baseline. For the primary endpoint, USL255 resulted in significantly better seizure outcomes compared with placebo regardless of drug-resistant status (P=.004 and P=.040 for “highly” and “less”, respectively). Responder rate was also significantly improved in patients with highly drug-resistant group (P=.023). The CGI-C scores indicated significant improvement in both subgroups (P=.003 and P=.013 for “highly” and “less”, respectively). On the QOLIE-31-P, a significant improvement on the seizure worry subscale for the group with less drug-resistant seizures was noted in USL255-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients (P=.003); the overall score and all other subscales were not significantly different for both subgroups. We conclude that USL255 led to significant improvements across multiple outcomes compared with placebo, including in those classified as having highly drug-resistant seizures to prior treatment, making it a valuable treatment option for patients with epilepsy

Safety of long-term treatment with tiagabine

AbstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of long-term treatment with tiagabine. We reviewed the case report forms of patients with refractory partial epilepsy who took tiagabine for longer than 6 months in two long-term studies. We classified all adverse events based on severity and persistence, and recorded the dose at onset of each adverse event. We then divided patients into those treated for 6–12 months, 12–24 months and >24 months. We compared the adverse event profile and change in seizure frequency among the three groups. Forty-two patients took tiagabine for longer than 6 months. The mean duration of treatment was 22.6 months. The mean monthly seizure frequency was 12.7 at baseline and 8.1 at study termination (36% decrease). The most common adverse events were: tiredness (56%), headache (46%), dizziness (44%), visual symptoms (blurring, difficulty focusing, diplopia) (39%), altered mentation (32%), and tremor (31%). The adverse event profile was comparable among the three groups. Seizure frequency was significantly more improved in the >24 months group. Long-term treatment with tiagabine is well tolerated. The most important predictor of long-term therapy with tiagabine was the degree of seizure improvement

Brivaracetam-induced elevation of carbamazepine epoxide levels: a post-hoc analysis from the clinical development program

To assess the association, if any, between brivaracetam (BRV)-induced elevated carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide (CBZ-E) and toxicity and efficacy in patients with epilepsy. Data were pooled from three double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III studies of adjunctive BRV in adults with uncontrolled focal seizures (N01252/NCT00490035, N01253/NCT00464269, N01358/NCT01261325). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of interest (ataxia, diplopia, dizziness, nystagmus, somnolence, accidental overdose or poisoning, and toxicity), discontinuations due to TEAEs, and serious TEAEs (SAEs) were assessed in subgroups who did/did not receive carbamazepine (CBZ) at study entry (CBZ+ and CBZ-). Logistic regression analysis evaluated CBZ-E/CBZ plasma concentrations and TEAEs. SAEs suggestive of CBZ-E toxicity were summarized from the BRV safety database up to a cut-off of October 1, 2014. Percent reduction in focal seizure frequency over placebo was assessed in subgroups of CBZ-E/CBZ ratios. Data from 1558 patients were included in the pooled safety population. Of these, concomitant CBZ was received by 184/459 (40.1%) placebo-treated and 315/803 (39.2%) BRV-treated patients (≥50 mg/day). In BRV-treated patients, study completion rates were similar in the CBZ+ (92.7%) and CBZ- (88.7%) groups; incidence of TEAEs of interest was similar (CBZ+ 24.4%; CBZ- 24.2%), and did not appear affected by CBZ dosage; SAEs and discontinuations due to TEAEs were CBZ+ 1.6%; CBZ- 3.9% and 2.9%; 9.2%, respectively. Likelihood of TEAEs of interest decreased with increasing CBZ-E/CBZ ratio for BRV-treated patients: odds ratio 0.88 (95% confidence intervals 0.74, 1.03; p = 0.112). In the safety database, five SAEs suggestive of CBZ-E toxicity were identified. Efficacy outcomes did not appear to have a consistent pattern across CBZ-E/CBZ ratio subgroups. This post-hoc analysis does not support an association between CBZ-E levels and TEAEs potentially associated with CBZ-E toxicity, or with increases in efficacy. Overall, current evidence does not suggest that BRV dose adjustment is required with concomitant CBZ