934-28 Sensitivity and Specificity of Angiographic Markers for Thrombus: A Prospective Comparison with Angioscopy

The limitations of angiography for the detection of intracoronary thrombus are well recognized. Between November 1991 and July 1994, we performed 402 angioscopy procedures in 225 vessels in 202 patients, with the Image-Cath (Baxter).We performed a prospective study in 190 of these patients, who had an interpretable angioscopy performed just before PTCA to determine the sensitivity and specificity of predetermined angiographic criteria that are considered to be indicative of the presence of intracoronary thrombus. Angiographically verified thrombus was used as the gold standard for comparison. Lesions were classified on angiography (2 orthogonal views) by independent observers. The presence of an intraluminal filling defect, of overhanging edges, of haziness, or of ulceration were noted. The characteristic ulceration was not mutually exclusive of the other 3 characteristics.Of 15 filling defects on angiography 14 (93%) had thrombus on angiography; in the 23 lesions with overhanging edges 19 (83%) had thrombus on angioscopy; in the 27 ulcerated lesions 21 (78%) had angioscopic thrombus; in the 6 lesions that were hazy on angiography 5 had angioscopic thrombus.AngioscopyThrombus+Thrombus-AngiographyThrombus+4512Thrombus-4093In our model, using 5 prespecified angiographic characteristics, angiography had high specificity (89%) but relatively low sensitivity (53%) for the detection of thrombus compared to angioscopy

Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor Monotherapy by Clinical Presentation: Pre-Specified Analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS Trial.

Background The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary drug-eluting stent placement in adults with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) versus acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remains uncertain. Methods and Results This was a prespecified subgroup analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS trial. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to the experimental or reference strategy, stratified by ACS (experimental, n=3750; reference, n=3737) versus SCAD (experimental, n=4230; reference, n=4251). The experimental strategy was 75 to 100 mg aspirin daily plus 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily for 1 month, followed by 23 months of ticagrelor monotherapy. The reference strategy was 75 to 100 mg aspirin daily plus either 75 mg clopidogrel daily (for SCAD) or 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily (for ACS) for 12 months, followed by aspirin monotherapy for 12 months. The primary end point at 2 years was a composite of all-cause mortality or non-fatal centrally adjudicated new Q-wave myocardial infarction. The key secondary safety end point was site-reported Bleeding Academic Research Consortium grade 3 or 5 bleeding. The primary end point occurred in 147 (3.92%) versus 169 (4.52%) patients with ACS (rate ratio [RR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.69-1.08; P=0.189), and in 157 (3.71%) versus 180 (4.23%) patients with SCAD (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71-1.08; P=0.221) with experimental and reference strategy, respectively (P-interaction=0.926). Bleeding Academic Research Consortium grade 3 or 5 bleeding occurred in 73 (1.95%) versus 100 (2.68%) patients with ACS (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.98; P=0.037), and in 90 (2.13%) versus 69 (1.62%) patients with SCAD (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.97-1.81; P=0.081; P-interaction=0.007). Conclusions While there was no evidence for differences in efficacy between treatment strategies by subgroup, the experimental strategy appeared to reduce bleeding risk in patients with ACS but not in patients with SCAD. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01813435