Understanding the influences on successful quality improvement in emergency general surgery: learning from the RCS Chole-QuIC project

Abstract: Background: Acute gallstone disease is the highest volume Emergency General Surgical presentation in the UK. Recent data indicate wide variations in the quality of care provided across the country, with national guidance for care delivery not implemented in most UK hospitals. Against this backdrop, the Royal College of Surgeons of England set up a 13-hospital quality improvement collaborative (Chole-QuIC) to support clinical teams to reduce time to surgery for patients with acute gallstone disease requiring emergency cholecystectomy. Methods: Prospective, mixed-methods process evaluation to answer the following: (1) how was the collaborative delivered by the faculty and received, understood and enacted by the participants; (2) what influenced teams’ ability to improve care for patients requiring emergency cholecystectomy? We collected and analysed a range of data including field notes, ethnographic observations of meetings, and project documentation. Analysis was based on the framework approach, informed by Normalisation Process Theory, and involved the creation of comparative case studies based on hospital performance during the project. Results: Chole-QuIC was delivered as planned and was well received and understood by participants. Four hospitals were identified as highly successful, based upon a substantial increase in the number of patients having surgery in line with national guidance. Conversely, four hospitals were identified as challenged, achieving no significant improvement. The comparative analysis indicate that six inter-related influences appeared most associated with improvement: (1) achieving clarity of purpose amongst site leads and key stakeholders; (2) capacity to lead and effective project support; (3) ideas to action; (4) learning from own and others’ experience; (5) creating additional capacity to do emergency cholecystectomies; and (6) coordinating/managing the patient pathway. Conclusion: Collaborative-based quality improvement is a viable strategy for emergency surgery but success requires the deployment of effective clinical strategies in conjunction with improvement strategies. In particular, achieving clarity of purpose about proposed changes amongst key stakeholders was a vital precursor to improvement, enabling the creation of additional surgical capacity and new pathways to be implemented effectively. Protected time, testing ideas, and the ability to learn quickly from data and experience were associated with greater impact within this cohort

Surgical Techniques of, and Outcomes after, Distal Muscle Stabilization in Transfemoral Amputation:A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

Background: Distal muscle stabilization, such as myodesis (suturing muscles to bone) or myoplasty (suturing agonistic-antagonistic muscles together), can aid residual limb stabilization, provide a good soft-tissue covering, and increase rehabilitation potential. However, surgical practice varies due to scant clinical data. The aim of this review is to summarize and evaluate the literature regarding techniques and associated outcomes of distal muscle stabilization in transfemoral amputation (TFA). Methods: A systematic review and narrative synthesis was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Resources, including observational studies, nonobservational scientific papers, conference proceedings, and textbooks, detailing techniques of TFA distal muscle stabilization were identified from standard medical repositories and library search. A supplementary search of YouTube and Google was undertaken to identify additional resources. Quality assessment was undertaken using Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies–of Interventions; Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Objectivity, Date, Significance; and modified-Discern tools. Results: Forty seven resources were identified, including 17 journal articles, 17 textbooks, 5 educational websites/eBooks, 5 videos, 2 online presentations, and 1 webpage. Thirty seven described myodesis, 11 described myoplasty, and 6 described closure without distal muscle stabilization. Eight observational studies presented outcome data for 302 TFAs. No studies comparing closure with or without distal muscle stabilization were identified. All papers describing myodesis secured the adductors to the femur, and most also secured the quadriceps and/or hamstrings to this complex. Number of femoral drill holes varied from 1 to 6. Early wound complications occurred in 17% of amputations, whereas myodesis failure occurred in 9.5%. Prosthetic fitting rates were 73% and, where reported, 100% of patients maintained neutral femoral alignment. Conclusions: Distal muscle stabilization, particularly myodesis, is a commonly described technique for TFA, although operative techniques are heterogenous. There is a paucity of outcome data, and no studies comparing it to closures without distal muscle stabilization. However, these low-quality data suggest wound healing rates are equivalent to TFA without distal muscle stabilization while demonstrating improvement to patients’ rehabilitation potential.</p