Bosanquet, david

Fabre, Ismay

Geertzen, Jan

Gwilym, Brenig Llwyd

Jones, Keith

Pinzur, Micheal

Thompson , Dominic

Twine, Chris P

BackgroundDistal muscle stabilization, such as myodesis (suturing muscles to bone) or myoplasty (suturing agonistic-antagonistic muscles together), can aid residual limb stabilization, provide a good soft-tissue covering, and increase rehabilitation potential. However, surgical practice varies due to scant clinical data. The aim of this review is to summarize and evaluate the literature regarding techniques and associated outcomes of distal muscle stabilization in transfemoral amputation (TFA).MethodsA systematic review and narrative synthesis was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Resources, including observational studies, nonobservational scientific papers, conference proceedings, and textbooks, detailing techniques of TFA distal muscle stabilization were identified from standard medical repositories and library search. A supplementary search of YouTube and Google was undertaken to identify additional resources. Quality assessment was undertaken using Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies–of Interventions; Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Objectivity, Date, Significance; and modified-Discern tools.ResultsForty seven resources were identified, including 17 journal articles, 17 textbooks, 5 educational websites/eBooks, 5 videos, 2 online presentations, and 1 webpage. Thirty seven described myodesis, 11 described myoplasty, and 6 described closure without distal muscle stabilization. Eight observational studies presented outcome data for 302 TFAs. No studies comparing closure with or without distal muscle stabilization were identified. All papers describing myodesis secured the adductors to the femur, and most also secured the quadriceps and/or hamstrings to this complex. Number of femoral drill holes varied from 1 to 6. Early wound complications occurred in 17% of amputations, whereas myodesis failure occurred in 9.5%. Prosthetic fitting rates were 73% and, where reported, 100% of patients maintained neutral femoral alignment.ConclusionsDistal muscle stabilization, particularly myodesis, is a commonly described technique for TFA, although operative techniques are heterogenous. There is a paucity of outcome data, and no studies comparing it to closures without distal muscle stabilization. However, these low-quality data suggest wound healing rates are equivalent to TFA without distal muscle stabilization while demonstrating improvement to patients’ rehabilitation potential

Bosanquet, David

Explore Bristol Research

Surgical Techniques of, and Outcomes after, Distal Muscle Stabilization in Transfemoral Amputation:A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

Surgical Techniques of, and outcomes after, Distal Muscle Stabilisation in Transfemoral Amputation; A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Surgical Techniques of, and outcomes after, Distal Muscle Stabilisation in Transfemoral Amputation; A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Explore Bristol Research