<div><p>Background</p><p>Public health programs to prevent invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) with monovalent serogroup C meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MCV-C) and quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccines (MCV-4) in infancy and adolescence vary across Canadian provinces. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of various vaccination strategies against IMD using current and anticipated future pricing and recent epidemiology.</p><p>Methods</p><p>A cohort model was developed to estimate the clinical burden and costs (CAN2014)ofIMDintheCanadianpopulationovera100−yeartimehorizonforthreestrategies:(1)MCV−Cininfantsandadolescents(MCV−C/C);(2)MCV−CininfantsandMCV−4inadolescents(MCV−C/4);and(3)MCV−4ininfants(2doses)andadolescents(MCV−4/4).ThesourceforIMDincidencewasCanadiansurveillancedata.TheeffectivenessofMCV−Cwasbasedonpublishedliterature.TheeffectivenessofMCV−4againstallvaccinationregimenswasassumedtobethesameasforMCV−CregimensagainstserogroupC.Herdeffectswereestimatedbycalibrationtoestimatesreportedinprioranalyses.Costswerefrompublishedsources.Vaccinespriceswereprojectedtodeclineovertimereflectinghistoricalprocurementtrends.</p><p>Results</p><p>Overthemodelinghorizonthereareaprojected11,438IMDcasesand1,195IMDdeathswithMCV−C/C;expectedtotalcostsare597.5 million. MCV-C/4 is projected to reduce cases of IMD by 1,826 (16%) and IMD deaths by 161 (13%). Vaccination costs are increased by 32millionbutdirectandindirectIMDcostsareprojectedtobereducedby46 million. MCV-C/4 is therefore dominant vs. MCV-C/C in the base case. Cost-effectiveness of MCV-4/4 was 111,286perQALYgainedversusMCV−C/4(2575/206IMDcases/deathsprevented;incrementalcosts68 million).</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>If historical trends in Canadian vaccines prices continue, use of MCV-4 instead of MCV-C in adolescents may be cost-effective. From an economic perspective, switching to MCV-4 as the adolescent booster should be considered.</p></div