Effect of resting pressure on the estimate of cerebrospinal fluid outflow conductance

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A lumbar infusion test is commonly used as a predictive test for patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus and for evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt function. Different infusion protocols can be used to estimate the outflow conductance (<it>C</it>_out) or its reciprocal the outflow resistance (<it>R</it>_out), with or without using the baseline resting pressure, <it>P</it>_r. Both from a basic physiological research and a clinical perspective, it is important to understand the limitations of the model on which infusion tests are based. By estimating <it>C</it>_out using two different analyses, with or without <it>P</it>_r, the limitations could be explored. The aim of this study was to compare the <it>C</it>_out estimates, and investigate what effect <it>P</it>_rhad on the results.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Sixty-three patients that underwent a constant pressure infusion protocol as part of their preoperative evaluation for normal pressure hydrocephalus, were included (age 70.3 ± 10.8 years (mean ± SD)). The analysis was performed without (<it>C</it>_{excl Pr}) and with (<it>C</it>_{incl Pr}) P_r. The estimates were compared using Bland-Altman plots and paired sample <it>t</it>-tests (<it>p </it>< 0.05 considered significant).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Mean <it>C</it>_out for the 63 patients was: <it>C</it>_{excl Pr}= 7.0 ± 4.0 (mean ± SD) μl/(s kPa) and <it>C</it>_{incl Pr} = 9.1 ± 4.3 μl/(s kPa) and <it>R</it>_out was 19.0 ± 9.2 and 17.7 ± 11.3 mmHg/ml/min, respectively. There was a positive correlation between methods (r = 0.79, n = 63, <it>p </it>< 0.01). The difference, Δ<it>C</it>_out= -2.1 ± 2.7 μl/(s kPa) between methods was significant (<it>p </it>< 0.01) and Δ<it>R</it>_outwas 1.2 ± 8.8 mmHg/ml/min). The Bland-Altman plot visualized that the variation around the mean difference was similar all through the range of measured values and there was no correlation between Δ<it>C</it>_outand <it>C</it>_out.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The difference between <it>C</it>_outestimates, obtained from analyses with or without <it>P</it>_r, needs to be taken into consideration when comparing results from studies using different infusion test protocols. The study suggests variation in CSF formation rate, variation in venous pressure or a pressure dependent <it>C</it>_outas possible causes for the deviation from the CSF absorption model seen in some patients.</p

Following the genes: a framework for animal modeling of psychiatric disorders

The number of individual cases of psychiatric disorders that can be ascribed to identified, rare, single mutations is increasing with great rapidity. Such mutations can be recapitulated in mice to generate animal models with direct etiological validity. Defining the underlying pathogenic mechanisms will require an experimental and theoretical framework to make the links from mutation to altered behavior in an animal or psychopathology in a human. Here, we discuss key elements of such a framework, including cell type-based phenotyping, developmental trajectories, linking circuit properties at micro and macro scales and definition of neurobiological phenotypes that are directly translatable to humans