Viral load assay sensitivity and low level viremia in HAART treated HIV patients

BACKGROUND: The recent introduction of highly sensitive viral load assays resulted in a significant increase in number of treated HIV-infected patients with a detectable viral load. The significance of a viral load between 20 and 50 copies/mL remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance of three viral load assays, with special attention for specificity and sensitivity at the lowest level of quantification. STUDY DESIGN: Samples (n=181) were selected from 62 HIV-positive individuals that experience viral blips or episodes of low but detectable viremia under antiretroviral treatment, and from 216 HIV-negative individuals. Each sample was tested in at least two of three assays: the Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor (CAP/CA), the Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 version 1 (CAP/CTM1) and the Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 version 2 (CAP/CTM2). RESULTS: No false positive results were recorded. Kappa statistics revealed fair to moderate agreement between the results of the three assays, but important differences in sensitivity were observed, with the highest sensitivity reported for CAP/CTM2 followed by CAP/CTM1 and CAP/CA. The differences in sensitivity remained after equalization of the detection limit for all assays at 50 copies/mL. Analysis of samples collected over time showed that patients with single blips in CAP/CA present with recurrent blips in CAP/CTM1 and persistent detectable viremia in CAP/CTM2. CONCLUSIONS: Viral load results between 20 and 50 copies/mL in either CAP/CTM1 or CAP/CTM2, indicate true viremia. The availability of highly sensitive assays force reconsideration of the terms 'undetectable' viral load and 'virological success' of antiretroviral treatment. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

Recurrent focal epithelial hyperplasia due to HPV13 in an HIV-positive patient

There are few reports on focal epithelial hyperplasia (FEH) in association with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection; thus the relationship between them has not been completely clarified yet. We present a case of recurrent FEH in an HIV positive man (the first described in Belgium), which, according to the PCR-DNA testing, was due to human papilloma virus type 13 (HPV13). To our knowledge, based on the accessible literature, this type of HPV has not been detected in any other documented study of FEH in HIV-positive patients before. Our patient experienced three recurrences of FEH in 1 year. It is therefore suggested that immunodeficiency due to HIV infection is responsible for the HPV-related FEH and the subsequent recurrences. In order to support the consideration of FEH as an oral manifestation of an HIV-related opportunistic infection, every new 'HPV-type' oral lesion in HIV-positive patients must be completely documented. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel

Safe and effective use of combination antiretroviral treatment

SCOPUS: re.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

The effect of treatment intensification in HIV-infection: a study comparing treatment with ritonavir/saquinavir and ritonavir/saquinavir/stavudine

Not the final published versionOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of treatment with ritonavir (RTV)/saquinavir (SQV)/6 stavudine (D4T) or RTV/SQV alone, with treatment intensification if needed, in protease inhibitor- and D4T-naïve HIV-1-infected individuals. DESIGN: Multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Two-hundred and eight patients were randomized to receive treatment with RTV 400 mg/SQV 400 mg twice daily or RTV 400 mg/SQV 400 mg/D4T 40 mg twice daily. Intensification of study medication with reverse transcriptase inhibitors was permitted if serum HIV-RNA remained > 400 copies/ml after 12 weeks of treatment. Follow-up of this study was 48 weeks. RESULTS: In a strict intention-to-treat analysis, counting all dropouts as virological failures, 63% [95% confidence interval (CI), 54-73%] of subjects in the RTV/SQV group (n = 104) reached a serum HIV-RNA < 400 copies/ml at week 48, as compared with 69% (95% CI, 60-78%) in the RTV/SQV/D4T group (n = 104; P = 0.379). In the on-treatment analysis these percentages were 88 and 91% respectively. Thirty-one patients intensified their study medication according to the protocol (28 in the RTV/SQV group, three in the RTV/SQV/D4T group). Thirty out of 31 (97%) patients had a serum HIV-RNA < 400 copies/ml at their last follow-up visit. Ten per cent of patients discontinued study medication due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: The concept of starting with a simple, potent regimen, that could be intensified if necessary, showed good virological results after 48 weeks in this study, comparable to starting with more drugs from the beginning. Longer follow-up is needed to determine the long-term efficacy of this treatment strategy

Inhibition of replication of primary HIV-1 isolates in huPBL-NOD/Scid mice by antibodies from HIV-1 infected patients

Although a limited number of HIV-infected patients have broadly neutralizing antibodies, it has not been examined whether these antibodies can protect against infection with primary virus in vivo. Here we screened the plasma of 23 HIV-1-infected patients for broadly neutralizing antibodies. Purified antibodies from subjects with broad and more narrow responses were administered to huPBL-NOD/Scid mice that were subsequently challenged with primary viruses of clade A, B and CRF01_AE. Although we observed a lack of correlation between the data from the in vitro neutralization assay and the results from the passive immunization experiments, we report for the first time that antibodies from HIV-infected persons can inhibit replication of primary virus isolates in an animal model

Haptoglobin polymorphism, iron metabolism and mortality in HIV infection

A

Risk factors for hepatotoxicity in HIV-1-infected patients receiving ritonavir and saquinavir with or without stavudine

Liver enzyme elevation (LEE) is commonly observed after combination antiretroviral therapy (ARVT) for HIV infection is begun. Potential risk factors for LEE after treatment with ritonavir and saquinavir with or without stavudine were investigated in 208 HIV-infected patients, by use of the Cox proportional hazard model. Eighteen patients (9%) developed LEE during the 48-week follow-up. Multivariate analysis, adjusted for baseline levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), showed that hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positivity (relative risk [RR], 8.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.3-23.1) and the use of stavudine (RR, 4.9; 95% CI, 1.5-16.0) were the only significant risk factors for developing LEE. After LEE occurred, ALT and AST concentrations decreased by >50% in 13 of 14 patients who continued ARVT during LEE. In this study, it appeared safe to continue ARVT during LEE; however, more data from larger studies are required to confirm this finding