70 research outputs found
Severe inflammatory reaction induced by peritoneal trauma is the key driving mechanism of postoperative adhesion formation
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Many factors have been put forward as a driving mechanism of surgery-triggered adhesion formation (AF). In this study, we underline the key role of specific surgical trauma related with open surgery (OS) and laparoscopic (LS) conditions in postoperative AF and we aimed to study peritoneal tissue inflammatory reaction (TIR), remodelling specific complications of open surgery (OS) versus LS and subsequently evaluating AF induced by these conditions.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A prospective randomized study was done in 80 anaesthetised female Wistar rats divided equally into 2 groups. Specific traumatic OS conditions were induced by midline incision line (MIL) extension and tissue drying and specific LS conditions were remodelled by intraperitoneal CO<sub>2 </sub>insufflation at the 10 cm of water. TIR was evaluated at the 24<sup>th</sup>, 72<sup>nd</sup>, 120<sup>th </sup>and 168<sup>th </sup>hour by scoring scale. Statistical analysis was performed by the non-parametric t test and two-way ANOVA using Bonferroni post-tests.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>More pronounced residual TIR was registered after OS than after LS. There were no significant TIR interactions though highly significant differences were observed between the OS and LS groups (p < 0.0001) with regard to surgical and time factors. The TIR change differences between the OS and LS groups were pronounced with postoperative time p < 0.05 at the 24<sup>th </sup>and 72<sup>nd</sup>; p < 0.01 - 120<sup>th </sup>and p < 0.001 - 168<sup>th </sup>hrs. Adhesion free wounds were observed in 20.0 and 31.0% of cases after creation of OS and LS conditions respectively; with no significant differences between these values (p > 0.05). However larger adhesion size (41.67 ± 33.63) was observed after OS in comparison with LS (20.31 ± 16.38). The upper-lower 95% confidential limits ranged from 60.29 to 23.04 and from 29.04 to 11.59 respectively after OS and LS groups with significant differences (p = 0.03). Analogous changes were observed in adhesion severity values. Subsequently, severe TIR parameters were followed by larger sizes of severe postoperative adhesions in the OS group than those observed in the LS group.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>MIL extension and tissue drying seem to be the key factors in the pathogenesis of adhesion formation, triggering severe inflammatory reactions of the peritoneal tissue surrounding the MIL resulting in local and systemic consequences. CO<sub>2 </sub>insufflation however, led to moderate inflammation and less adhesion formation.</p
The plasminogen activator inhibitor system in colon cancer cell lines is influenced by the CO2 pneumoperitoneum
Peritoneal changes due to laparoscopic surgery
Item does not contain fulltextBACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has been incorporated into common surgical practice. The peritoneum is an organ with various biologic functions that may be affected in different ways by laparoscopic and open techniques. Clinically, these alterations may be important in issues such as peritoneal metastasis and adhesion formation. METHODS: A literature search using the Pubmed and Cochrane databases identified articles focusing on the key issues of laparoscopy, peritoneum, inflammation, morphology, immunology, and fibrinolysis. Results : Laparoscopic surgery induces alterations in the peritoneal integrity and causes local acidosis, probably due to peritoneal hypoxia. The local immune system and inflammation are modulated by a pneumoperitoneum. Additionally, the peritoneal plasmin system is inhibited, leading to peritoneal hypofibrinolysis. CONCLUSION: Similar to open surgery, laparoscopic surgery affects both the integrity and biology of the peritoneum. These observations may have implications for various clinical conditions.1 januari 201
Parâmetros psicométricos: uma análise de testes psicológicos comercializados no Brasil
Histamine in hemorrhagic shock - A new approach with microdialysis
Microdialysis is a new approach for monitoring after hemorrhagic shock. The advantage of microdialysis is the local measurement of microcirculation and local changes of mediators. Until now this was mostly used in neuromonitoring. In this experiment we were focussed on the local changes of histamine in the liver after hemorrhagic shock by female pigs. Histamine is a vasoactive mediator which is well described in septic shock. The role of histamine after hemorrhagic shock is rarely known. Especially changes of histamine in the liver after shock is from our knowledge not clear. We could show, that after a short peak by placing the probes in the liver histamine increased in shock and we could further see, that we get two different reactions of histamine in the liver in shock depending on the position of the probes. Central placed probes do not show a relevant increase of histamine during hemorrhagic shock. If probes are placed in periphery regions of the liver microdialysis shows a significant increase of histamine by those animals, which die in an early phase after shock. Surviving animals do not get such an increase of histamine. In our experiment histamine had a prognostic value by peripheral placed probes in the liver after hemorrhagic shock
- …