Targeted hepatitis C antibody testing interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Testing for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection may reduce the risk of liver-related morbidity, by facilitating earlier access to treatment and care. This review investigated the effectiveness of targeted testing interventions on HCV case detection, treatment uptake, and prevention of liver-related morbidity. A literature search identified studies published up to 2013 that compared a targeted HCV testing intervention (targeting individuals or groups at increased risk of HCV) with no targeted intervention, and results were synthesised using meta-analysis. Exposure to a targeted testing intervention, compared to no targeted intervention, was associated with increased cases detected [number of studies (n) = 14; pooled relative risk (RR) 1.7, 95 % CI 1.3, 2.2] and patients commencing therapy (n = 4; RR 3.3, 95 % CI 1.1, 10.0). Practitioner-based interventions increased test uptake and cases detected (n = 12; RR 3.5, 95 % CI 2.5, 4.8; and n = 10; RR 2.2, 95 % CI 1.4, 3.5, respectively), whereas media/information-based interventions were less effective (n = 4; RR 1.5, 95 % CI 0.7, 3.0; and n = 4; RR 1.3, 95 % CI 1.0, 1.6, respectively). This meta-analysis provides for the first time a quantitative assessment of targeted HCV testing interventions, demonstrating that these strategies were effective in diagnosing cases and increasing treatment uptake. Strategies involving practitioner-based interventions yielded the most favourable outcomes. It is recommended that testing should be targeted at and offered to individuals who are part of a population with high HCV prevalence, or who have a history of HCV risk behaviour

A randomized trial of viral hepatitis prevention among underprivileged people in the Lyon area of France

Background We compared the efficacy of two viral hepatitis B and C (VHBC) screening strategies, relative to no intervention, among underprivileged people (UP) living in shelters in the Lyon area.Methods Eighteen of 37 shelters were randomly sampled after stratification based on the accommodation capacity and the screening centres/shelters distance. Through randomization, the S0 strategy (no intervention), the S1 strategy [group information (GI) and referral for screening] and the S2 strategy (GI and in situ screening) were each applied in six shelters. A standardized questionnaire was offered to each participant. Follow-up of positive cases was organized via the reference centre of VHBC of Lyon.Results The screening completion rate (SCR) among 1276 included subjects in S0, S1 and S2 was 1.5, 42.8 and 59.7%, respectively (P < 10(-6)). This rate was higher in S2 regardless of the sociodemographic variable considered. Odds ratios (OR) of screening completion (SC) was significantly higher in S1 versus S0, OR = 49.8 [95% confidence interval (CI): 26.1-102.1], in S2 versus S0, OR = 98.5 (95% CI: 51.9-200.8) and in S2 versus S1, OR = 2.0 (95% CI: 1.3-2.9). Age, country of birth and professional inactivity were independently associated with SC.Conclusions Health authorities must ensure widespread screening of UP, which is more effective when conducted in shelters than in screening centres

Caractéristiques des personnes alcoolo-dépendantes incarcérées en maison d'arrêt - Characteristics of alcohol-dependent male inmates

International audienc

Caractéristiques des personnes alcoolo-dépendantes incarcérées en maison d'arrêt - Characteristics of alcohol-dependent male inmates

International audienc