42 research outputs found

    Liver transplantation at Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital

    Get PDF
    The liver transplant programme for infants and children at Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital is the only established paediatric service in sub-Saharan Africa. Referrals for liver transplant assessment come from  most provinces within Smith Africa as well as neighbouring countries. Patients and methods. Since 1987, 81 children (range 6 months - 14 years) have had 84liver transplants with biliary atresia being the most frequent diagnosis. The indications for transplantation include biliary atresia (48), metabolic (7), fulminant hepatic failure (10), redo transplants (3) and other (16). Four combined liver/kidney transplants have been performed. Fifty-three were reduced-size transplants with donor/recipient weight ratios  ranging from 2:1 to 11:1 and .32 children weighed less than 10 kg.Results. Sixty patients (74%) survived 3 months -14 years post transplant. Overall cumulative 1- and 5-year patient survival figures are 79% and 70% respectively. However, with the introduction of prophylactic intravenous ganciclovir and the exclusion of hepatitis B virus (HBV) IgG core Ab-positive donors, the 1-year patient survival is 90% and the projected 5-year  paediatric survival is> 80%. Early(< 1 month) postliver- transplantmortality was low. Causes include primary malfunction (1), inferior vena cava   thrombosis (1), bleeding oesophageal ulcer (1), sepsis (1) and cerebral oedema (1). Late morbidity and mortality was mainly due to infections: de novo hepatitis B (5 patients, 2 deaths), Epstein--Barr virus (EBV)related post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease (12 patients, 7 deaths) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease (10 patients, 5 deaths). Tuberculosis (TB) treatment in 3 patients was complicated by chronic rejection (1) and TB-drug-induced subfulminant liver failure (1).Conclusion. Despite limited resources, a successful paediatric programme has been established with good patient and graft survival figures and excellent quality of life. Shortage of donors because of infection with HBV and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) leads to significant waiting-list mortality and infrequent transplantation

    Liver transplantation at Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital

    Get PDF
    No Abstract. South African Medical Journal Vol. 96(9) (Part 2) 2006: 960-96

    TABADO: "Evaluation of a smoking cessation program among Adolescents in Vocational Training Centers": Study protocol

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Most of the efforts to reduce teenagers' tobacco addiction have focused on smoking prevention and little on smoking cessation. A smoking cessation program (TABADO study), associating pharmacologic and cognitive-behavioural strategy, on a particularly vulnerable population (vocational trainees), was developed. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the program which was offered to all smokers in a population aged 15 to 20 years in Vocational Training Centers (VTC). This paper presents the TABADO study protocol.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The study is quasi-experimental, prospective, evaluative and comparative and takes place during the 2 years of vocational training. The final population will be composed of 2000 trainees entering a VTC in Lorraine, France, during the 2008-2009 period. The intervention group (1000 trainees) benefited from the TABADO program while no specific intervention took place in the "control" group (1000 trainees) other than the treatment and education services usually available. Our primary outcome will be the tobacco abstinence rate at 12 months.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>If the program proves effective, it will be a new tool in the action against smoking in populations that have been seldom targeted until now. In addition, the approach could be expanded to other young subjects from socially disadvantaged backgrounds in the context of a public health policy against smoking among adolescents.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>Clinical trial identification number is NTC00973570.</p

    What makes health impact assessments successful? Factors contributing to effectiveness in Australia and New Zealand

    Get PDF
    Background: While many guidelines explain how to conduct Health Impact Assessments (HIAs), less is known about the factors that determine the extent to which HIAs affect health considerations in the decision making process. We investigated which factors are associated with increased or reduced effectiveness of HIAs in changing decisions and in the implementation of policies, programs or projects. This study builds on and tests the Harris and Harris-Roxas' conceptual framework for evaluating HIA effectiveness, which emphasises context, process and output as key domains. Methods: We reviewed 55 HIA reports in Australia and New Zealand from 2005 to 2009 and conducted surveys and interviews for 48 of these HIAs. Eleven detailed case studies were undertaken using document review and stakeholder interviews. Case study participants were selected through purposeful and snowball sampling. The data were analysed by thematic content analysis. Findings were synthesised and mapped against the conceptual framework. A stakeholder forum was utilised to test face validity and practical adequacy of the findings. Results: We found that some features of HIA are essential, such as the stepwise but flexible process, and evidence based approach. Non-essential features that can enhance the impact of HIAs include capacity and experience; 'right person right level'; involvement of decision-makers and communities; and relationships and partnerships. There are contextual factors outside of HIA such as fit with planning and decision making context, broader global context and unanticipated events, and shared values and goals that may influence a HIA. Crosscutting factors include proactive positioning, and time and timeliness. These all operate within complex open systems, involving multiple decision-makers, levels of decision-making, and points of influence. The Harris and Harris-Roxas framework was generally supported. Conclusion: We have confirmed previously identified factors influencing effectiveness of HIA and identified new factors such as proactive positioning. Our findings challenge some presumptions about 'right' timing for HIA and the rationality and linearity of decision-making processes. The influence of right timing on decision making needs to be seen within the context of other factors such as proactive positioning. This research can help HIA practitioners and researchers understand and identify what can be enhanced within the HIA process. Practitioners can adapt the flexible HIA process to accommodate the external contextual factors identified in this report

    Methodologies used to estimate tobacco-attributable mortality: a review

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>One of the most important measures for ascertaining the impact of tobacco on a population is the estimation of the mortality attributable to its use. To measure this, a number of indirect methods of quantification are available, yet there is no consensus as to which furnishes the best information. This study sought to provide a critical overview of the different methods of attribution of mortality due to tobacco consumption.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>A search was made in the Medline database until March 2005 in order to obtain papers that addressed the methodology employed for attributing mortality to tobacco use.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Of the total of 7 methods obtained, the most widely used were the prevalence methods, followed by the approach proposed by Peto et al, with the remainder being used in a minority of studies.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Different methodologies are used to estimate tobacco attributable mortality, but their methodological foundations are quite similar in all. Mainly, they are based on the calculation of proportional attributable fractions. All methods show limitations of one type or another, sometimes common to all methods and sometimes specific.</p

    A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risks

    Get PDF
    Traditional methods of risk assessment have provided good service in support of policy, mainly in relation to standard setting and regulation of hazardous chemicals or practices. In recent years, however, it has become apparent that many of the risks facing society are systemic in nature – complex risks, set within wider social, economic and environmental contexts. Reflecting this, policy-making too has become more wide-ranging in scope, more collaborative and more precautionary in approach. In order to inform such policies, more integrated methods of assessment are needed. Based on work undertaken in two large EU-funded projects (INTARESE and HEIMTSA), this paper reviews the range of approaches to assessment now in used, proposes a framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment (both as a basis for bringing together and choosing between different methods of assessment, and extending these to more complex problems), and discusses some of the challenges involved in conducting integrated assessments to support policy
    corecore