Intensive versus conventional insulinotherapy after elective and on-pump myocardial revascularization: a prospective and randomized study

OBJECTIVES: Strict glycemic control is increasingly recognized as an important goal in a broad spectrum of critically ill patients. We analyzed the inflammatory and clinical response of patients submitted to intensive or conventional insulinotherapy in a specific clinical context. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed a prospective and randomized collected database of an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in a University Hospital. The database comprised a total of 50 patients aged 30 to 80 (ASA II-III) who underwent elective and on-pump myocardial revascularization from September 2006 to June 2008. On ICU admission, patients were randomly assigned to Group 1 (intensive insulinotherapy) or Group 2 (conventional insulinotherapy). Data collected included glucose and lactate blood levels, haemodynamic parameters, cytokines (TNFalpha, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10), C-Reactive Protein, white blood cells and platelets blood levels, body temperature, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, Infection Probability Score (IPS) and ICU length of stay (LOS). Within-between group analysis, one-way ANOVA and unpaired t-test were used when appropriate. RESULTS: Pre- and perioperative variables were comparable between the two groups (p=NS for all measurements). Glucose and lactate blood levels were lower in Group 1 (p less than 0.0001). Stroke Volume Index was higher in Group 1 (p less than 0.05). Moreover, we observed statistically significant differences between groups in terms of inflammatory parameters and severity scores. No difference was observed in ICU LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive insulinotherapy after elective on-pump myocardial revascularization significantly modulates the inflammatory response. Different inflammatory patterns could correlate with different clinical response as suggested by SOFA and IP score analysis