Werklast bestuurlijke boete

The purpose of this study was to design an instrument to analyse the workload effects of legislation with punitive administrative sanctions. The central question of this research project has been: what factors determine the workload regarding court cases on administrative fines

Trendrapportage gerechtsdeurwaarders 2006. Toegankelijkheid, continuïteit en kwaliteit van de ambtelijke dienstverlening

Item does not contain fulltex

Trendrapportage gerechtsdeurwaarders 2006

The Dutch Minister of Justice is reponsible for the primary duties of bailiffs, because these duties are in the interest of the administration of justice, which is bound by statutory rules. To keep up to date with the system's workings, the Ministry has asked for a bi-annual report on the situation and developments in terms of a) accessibility, b) continuity and c) quality of the services provided. Index Summar

Het straffende bestuur

The September 2005 issue of Judicial Explorations focuses on punishment in the Netherlands and how this is increasingly taking place outside the Courts. On the one hand this involves administrative bodies that issue fines. Some sixty laws in 2005 alone stipulate an administrative fine as a settlement option. But there are other ways to bypass the Court, for instance by assigning the Public Prosecutor’s Office autonomous sanction authority subject to certain restrictions and conditions. In early 2005 the Lower House adopted the bill on settlement options by the Public Prosecution Service. The differences with the Public Prosecution out-of-court settlement powers introduced previously are also explained in this issue. The issue further discusses the possible implications of the introduction of the settlement by the Public Prosecution Service in respect of the legal protection by, openness and powers of the Public Prosecution Service and the police