4 research outputs found
Premalignant changes in the bronchial epithelium are prognostic factors of distant metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer patients
Background: The study assessed the possibility of dividing patients into groups based on the assessment of morphological changes in the epithelium of small-caliber bronchi located near the primary tumor in order to predict high and low risks of distant metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: In 171 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (T1-4N0-3M0) in small-caliber bronchi taken at a distance of 3–5 cm from the tumor, various variants of morphological changes in the bronchial epithelium (basal cell hyperplasia (BCH), squamous cell metaplasia (SM), and dysplasia (D)) were assessed. Long-term results of treatment, namely, distant metastasis, were assessed after 2 and 5 years. Results: During the follow-up period, distant metastases were found in 35.1% (60/171) of patients. Most often, they were observed in patients of the high-risk group: BCH+SM−D−(51.6%, 40/95) and BCH−SM+D+ (54.4%, 6/11). Less often, distant metastases were observed in low-risk group patients: BCH+SM+D− (6.7%, 3/45) and BCH−SM−D−(10.0%, 2/20). Tumor size, grade, and stage were significant predictors of metastasis only in the high-risk group. The 5-year metastasis-free survival was better in the low-risk group of distant metastases. Conclusions: Isolated BCH or dysplasia in small bronchi distant from foci of tumor isassociated with a high-risk distant metastasis and less 5-year metastasis-free survival
Personalized Prescription of Chemotherapy Based on Assessment of mRNA Expression of BRCA1, RRM1, ERCC1, TOP1, TOP2α, TUBβ3, TYMS, and GSTP1 Genes in Tumors Compared to Standard Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Objectives: A growing body of evidence suggests the important role of chemosensitive gene expression in the prognosis of patients with lung cancer. However, studies on combined gene expression assessments for personalized prescriptions of chemotherapy regimens in patients have not yet been conducted. The aim of this work was to conduct a prospective study on the appointment of personalized chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Materials and methods: The present study analyzed 85 patients with lung cancer (stage IIB-IIIB). Within this group, 48 patients received individualized chemotherapy, and 37 patients received classical chemotherapy. In the individualized chemotherapy group, the mRNA expression levels of ERCC1, RRM1, TUBB3, TYMS, TOP1, TOP2α, BRCA1, and GSTP1 in lung tissues were measured by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), and an individual chemotherapy regimen was developed for each patient according to the results. Patients in the classical chemotherapy group received the vinorelbine/carboplatin regimen. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Prognostic factors of metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients were identified via Cox’s proportional hazards regression model. Results: MFS and OS were significantly better in the personalized chemotherapy group compared to the classic chemotherapy group (MFS, 46.22 vs. 22.9 months, p = 0.05; OS, 58.6 vs. 26.9 months, p < 0.0001). Importantly, the best metastasis-free survival rates in the group with personalized ACT were achieved in patients treated with the paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen. Based on an assessment of chemosensitivity gene expression in the tumors, the classical chemotherapy strategy also increased the risk of death (HR = 14.82; 95% CI: 3.33–65.86; p < 0.000) but not metastasis (HR = 1.95; 95% CI: 0.96–3.98; p = 0.06) compared to the group of patients with chemotherapy. Conclusions: The use of combined ERCC1, RRM1, TUBB3, TYMS, TOP1, TOP2α, BRCA1, and GSTP1 gene expression results for personalized chemotherapy can improve treatment efficacy and reduce unnecessary toxicity