Low birthweight and preterm birth in young people with special educational needs: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis-1

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Low birthweight and preterm birth in young people with special educational needs: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/6/1</p><p>BMC Medicine 2008;6():1-1.</p><p>Published online 30 Jan 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2241838.</p><p></p> (= 0.036). The coloured bar represents the statistic for plotted results. Results are plotted onto the SPM99 canonical T1 image for the purpose of illustration

Low birthweight and preterm birth in young people with special educational needs: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis-3

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Low birthweight and preterm birth in young people with special educational needs: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/6/1</p><p>BMC Medicine 2008;6():1-1.</p><p>Published online 30 Jan 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2241838.</p><p></p>preterm birth (< 37 weeks) is shown in red and data from participants with gestational age of 37 weeks or more is shown in blue

Low birthweight and preterm birth in young people with special educational needs: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis-2

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Low birthweight and preterm birth in young people with special educational needs: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/6/1</p><p>BMC Medicine 2008;6():1-1.</p><p>Published online 30 Jan 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2241838.</p><p></p>(< 2500 g) is shown in red and data from participants with birthweight of at least 2500 g is shown in blue

Low birthweight and preterm birth in young people with special educational needs: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis-0

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Low birthweight and preterm birth in young people with special educational needs: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/6/1</p><p>BMC Medicine 2008;6():1-1.</p><p>Published online 30 Jan 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2241838.</p><p></p>coloured bar represents the statistic for plotted results. Results are plotted onto the SPM99 canonical T1 image for the purpose of illustration

Correlations between fMRI activation and individual psychotic symptoms in un-medicated subjects at high genetic risk of schizophrenia-2

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Correlations between fMRI activation and individual psychotic symptoms in un-medicated subjects at high genetic risk of schizophrenia"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/7/61</p><p>BMC Psychiatry 2007;7():61-61.</p><p>Published online 29 Oct 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2169235.</p><p></p>symptom dimensions were as follows: Delusions × hallucinations r = 0.34 (p < 0.01); delusions × suspiciousness/persecution r = 0.48 (p < 0.01); hallucinations × suspiciousness/persecution r = 0.32 (p < 0.01)

Correlations between fMRI activation and individual psychotic symptoms in un-medicated subjects at high genetic risk of schizophrenia-0

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Correlations between fMRI activation and individual psychotic symptoms in un-medicated subjects at high genetic risk of schizophrenia"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/7/61</p><p>BMC Psychiatry 2007;7():61-61.</p><p>Published online 29 Oct 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2169235.</p><p></p>symptom dimensions were as follows: Delusions × hallucinations r = 0.34 (p < 0.01); delusions × suspiciousness/persecution r = 0.48 (p < 0.01); hallucinations × suspiciousness/persecution r = 0.32 (p < 0.01)

Correlations between fMRI activation and individual psychotic symptoms in un-medicated subjects at high genetic risk of schizophrenia-1

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Correlations between fMRI activation and individual psychotic symptoms in un-medicated subjects at high genetic risk of schizophrenia"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/7/61</p><p>BMC Psychiatry 2007;7():61-61.</p><p>Published online 29 Oct 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC2169235.</p><p></p>esenting increasing activation with increasing difficulty. For the encoding/retrieval task, contrasts shown are (c) word classification versus experimental baseline, (d) correct recognition versus experimental baseline, and (e) correct rejection versus experimental baseline. For illustration purposes maps are thresholded at T = 4.5, 4, 6, 5, 5 respectively, extent threshold = 50 voxels. Left hemisphere shown on left of image