16 research outputs found
The XENON1T Data Distribution and Processing Scheme
The XENON experiment is looking for non-baryonic particle dark matter in the
universe. The setup is a dual phase time projection chamber (TPC) filled with
3200 kg of ultra-pure liquid xenon. The setup is operated at the Laboratori
Nazionali del Gran Sasso (LNGS) in Italy. We present a full overview of the
computing scheme for data distribution and job management in XENON1T. The
software package Rucio, which is developed by the ATLAS collaboration,
facilitates data handling on Open Science Grid (OSG) and European Grid
Infrastructure (EGI) storage systems. A tape copy at the Center for High
Performance Computing (PDC) is managed by the Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM).
Data reduction and Monte Carlo production are handled by CI Connect which is
integrated into the OSG network. The job submission system connects resources
at the EGI, OSG, SDSC's Comet, and the campus HPC resources for distributed
computing. The previous success in the XENON1T computing scheme is also the
starting point for its successor experiment XENONnT, which starts to take data
in autumn 2019.Comment: 8 pages, 2 figures, CHEP 2018 proceeding
Recommended from our members
Study of Excess Electronic Recoil Events in XENON1T
XENON1T is a ton-scale liquid xenon time projection chamber primarily designed to search for dark matter. Due to its unprecedented low-background level, large detector mass, and low energy threshold, XENON1T is sensitive to a multitude of phenomena not described by the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics. In this work, XENON1T is used to search for electronic recoils induced by (1) solar axions, (2) a neutrino magnetic dipole moment, and (3) bosonic dark matter.
To search for these signals, a full understanding of the detector response and sources of background is required. The event reconstruction and energy threshold are described in particular detail, and all known sources of background are characterized according to their energy spectra and temporal dependencies in order to develop a full background model predicting the energy spectrum of XENON1T electronic recoil data.
When the XENON1T data is compared to this background prediction, an excess at low energies is observed that disfavors the background hypothesis at . A mol/mol concentration of tritium may explain the excess; however, such a small concentration is not possible to confirm independently. Without conclusive evidence of a new source of background, the excess is interpreted in the context of potential beyond-the-SM physics. A solar axion model with axion-electron coupling , favored at 3.4, describes the observed excess the best, followed by an enhanced neutrino magnetic moment (3.2), and a 2.3 keV bosonic dark matter particle (3.0, global). If the excess persists, XENONnT, the successor to XENON1T, will be able to determine its origins likely within a few months of science data
Sensitivity of a Liquid Xenon Detector to Neutrino–Nucleus Coherent Scattering and Neutrino Magnetic Moment from Reactor Neutrinos
Liquid xenon is one of the leading targets to search for dark matter via its elastic scattering on nuclei or electrons. Due to their low-threshold and low-background capabilities, liquid xenon detectors can also detect coherent elastic neutrino–nucleus scattering (CEνNS) or neutrino–electron scattering. In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of a compact and movable liquid xenon detector with an active target mass of O(10∼100) kg and single-electron sensitivity to detect CEνNS from anti-neutrinos from a nuclear reactor. Assuming a single- and few-electron background rate at the level achieved by the XENON10/100 experiments, we expect a 5-σ detection of CEνNS with less than 400 kg-days of exposure. We further investigate the sensitivity of such a detector to neutrino magnetic moment with neutrino electron scattering. If an electronic recoil background rate of 0.01∼0.1 events/keV/kg/day above 1 keV can be achieved with adequate shielding, a liquid xenon detector can reach a neutrino magnetic moment sensitivity of 10−11μB, which would improve upon the current most-constraining laboratory limits from the GEMMA and Borexino experiments. Additionally, such a detector would be able to probe the region compatible with a magnetic moment interpretation of the low-energy excess electronic recoil events recently reported by XENON1T
The XENON1T Data Distribution and Processing Scheme
The XENON experiment is looking for non-baryonic particle dark matter in the universe. The setup is a dual phase time projection chamber (TPC) filled with 3200 kg of ultra-pure liquid xenon. The setup is operated at the Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso (LNGS) in Italy. We present a full overview of the computing scheme for data distribution and job management in XENON1T. The software package Rucio, which is developed by the ATLAS collaboration, facilitates data handling on Open Science Grid (OSG) and European Grid Infrastructure (EGI) storage systems. A tape copy at the Centre for High Performance Computing (PDC) is managed by the Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM). Data reduction and Monte Carlo production are handled by CI Connect which is integrated into the OSG network. The job submission system connects resources at the EGI, OSG, SDSC’s Comet, and the campus HPC resources for distributed computing.
The previous success in the XENON1T computing scheme is also the starting point for its successor experiment XENONnT, which starts to take data in autumn 2019
AxFoundation/strax: v1.5.4
What's Changed
Split compare_metadata into utils.compare_meta by @dachengx in https://github.com/AxFoundation/strax/pull/754
Change endtime - time >= 0 to endtime >= time by @JYangQi00 in https://github.com/AxFoundation/strax/pull/756
Mandatorily wrap _read_chunk in a check_chunk_n decorator by @dachengx in https://github.com/AxFoundation/strax/pull/758
New Contributors
@JYangQi00 made their first contribution in https://github.com/AxFoundation/strax/pull/756
Full Changelog: https://github.com/AxFoundation/strax/compare/v1.5.3...v1.5.
Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: Puzzling Excesses in Dark Matter Searches and How to Resolve Them
Intriguing signals with excesses over expected backgrounds have been observed in many astrophysical and terrestrial settings, which could potentially have a dark matter origin. Astrophysical excesses include the Galactic Center GeV gamma-ray excess detected by the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope, the AMS antiproton and positron excesses, and the 511 and 3.5 keV X-ray lines. Direct detection excesses include the DAMA/LIBRA annual modulation signal, the XENON1T excess, and low-threshold excesses in solid state detectors. We discuss avenues to resolve these excesses, with actions the field can take over the next several years
Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: Puzzling Excesses in Dark Matter Searches and How to Resolve Them
Intriguing signals with excesses over expected backgrounds have been observed in many astrophysical and terrestrial settings, which could potentially have a dark matter origin. Astrophysical excesses include the Galactic Center GeV gamma-ray excess detected by the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope, the AMS antiproton and positron excesses, and the 511 and 3.5 keV X-ray lines. Direct detection excesses include the DAMA/LIBRA annual modulation signal, the XENON1T excess, and low-threshold excesses in solid state detectors. We discuss avenues to resolve these excesses, with actions the field can take over the next several years
Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: Puzzling Excesses in Dark Matter Searches and How to Resolve Them
Intriguing signals with excesses over expected backgrounds have been observed in many astrophysical and terrestrial settings, which could potentially have a dark matter origin. Astrophysical excesses include the Galactic Center GeV gamma-ray excess detected by the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope, the AMS antiproton and positron excesses, and the 511 and 3.5 keV X-ray lines. Direct detection excesses include the DAMA/LIBRA annual modulation signal, the XENON1T excess, and low-threshold excesses in solid state detectors. We discuss avenues to resolve these excesses, with actions the field can take over the next several years