Results of Experiment 3.

<p>a) Sensitivity scores and b) reaction times (for target present trials only) for each cue type (LSF, HSF) by memory condition (memory, no-memory), grouped by ISI (100 ms, 700 ms). Error bars represent standard errors.</p

Results from the Bayesian null-hypothesis testing.

<p>Evidence for both the null and alternative hypothesis for the spatial-frequency by memory interaction are presented for all three experiments.</p

Paradigm and Results of Experiment 2.

<p>a) Trial sequence in the orienting task. A jittered pre-trial fixation was followed by one of three types of cue: non-filtered, low- or high-spatial-frequency filtered image. This was followed by a variable inter-stimulus interval, and finally the target image, which was never filtered. Participants had to indicate with a mouse press whether or not there was a target currently present in the target image. b) Sensitivity scores and c) reaction times (for target present trials only) for each cue type (NSF, LSF, HSF) by memory condition (memory, no-memory). Error bars represent standard errors.</p