No nosocomial transmission under standard hygiene precautions in short term contact patients in case of an unexpected ESBL or Q&A E. coli positive patient:a one-year prospective cohort study within three regional hospitals

Background: Many Highly Resistant Gram Negative Rod (HR-GNR) positive patients are found unexpectedly in clinical cultures, besides patients who are screened and isolated based on risk factors. As unexpected HR-GNR positive patients are isolated after detection, transmission to contact patients possibly occurred. The added value of routine contact tracing in such situations within hospitals with standard hygiene precautions is unknown. Methods: In 2014, this study was performed as a prospective cohort study. Index patients were defined as those tested unexpectedly HR-GNR positive in clinical cultures to diagnose a possible infection and were nursed under standard hygiene precautions before tested positive. After detection they were nursed in contact isolation. Contact patients were still hospitalized and shared the same room with the index patient for at least 12 h. HR-GNR screening was performed by culturing a rectal and throat swab. Clonal relatedness of HR-GNR isolates was determined using whole genome sequencing (WGS). Results: Out of 152 unexpected HR-GNR positive patients, 35 patients (23.0%) met our inclusion criteria for index patient. ESBL E. coli was found most frequently (n = 20, 57.1%), followed by Q&A E. coli (n = 10, 28.6%), ESBL K. pneumoniae (n = 3, 8.5%), ESBL R. ornithinolytica (n = 1, 2.9%) and multi resistant P. aeruginosa (n = 1, 2.9%). After contact tracing, 69 patients were identified as contact patient of an index patient, with a median time between start of contact and sampling of 3 days. None were found HR-GNR positive by nosocomial transmission. Conclusions: In a local setting within hospitals with standard hygiene precautions, routine contact tracing among unexpected HR-GNR positive patients may be replaced by appropriate surveillance as we found no nosocomial transmission in short term contacts

Prevalence, risk factors and molecular epidemiology of highly resistant gram negative rods in hospitalized patients in the Dutch region Kennemerland

Abstract Background This paper describes (1) the Highly Resistant Gram Negative Rod (HR-GNR) prevalence rate, (2) their genotypes, acquired resistance genes and (3) associated risk factors of HR-GNR colonization among the hospitalized population in the Dutch region Kennemerland. Methods Between 1 October 2013 and 31 March 2014, cross-sectional prevalence measurements were performed in three regional hospitals as part of each hospitals infection control program. Rectal swabs were analyzed at the Regional Public Health Laboratory Kennemerland by direct culturing. Genotypes and acquired resistance genes of positive isolates were determined using Whole Genome Sequencing with the MiSeq instrument (Illumina). Association between several independent variables and HR-GNR positivity was examined using logistic regression models. Results Out of 427 patients, 24 HR-GNR positive isolates were recovered from 22 patients, resulting in a regional HR-GNR colonization prevalence (95 % CI) of 5.2 % (3.6–7.9). Of these 22 positive patients, 15 were Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) positive (3.5 % (2.1–5.7)), 7 patients were positive for a Fluoroquinolones and Aminoglycosides (Q&A) resistant Enterobacteriaceae (1.6 % (0.8–3.3)) and from one patient (0.2 % (0–1.3)) a Stenotrophomonas maltophilia resistant towards co-trimoxazole was isolated. No carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE), multi-resistant Acinetobacter species or multi-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa were isolated. The ESBL genes found were bla CTX-M-1 (n = 4, 25.0 %), bla CTX-M-15 (n = 3, 18.8 %), bla CTX-M-27 (n = 2, 12.5 %), bla CTX-M-14b (n = 2, 12.5 %), bla CTX-M-9 (n = 2, 12.5 %), bla CTX-M-14 (n = 1, 6.3 %), bla CTX-M-3 (n = 1, 6.3 %), bla SHV-11 (n = 1, 6.3 %) and bla SHV-12 (n = 1, 6.3 %). Being known HR-GNR positive in the past was the only significant associated risk factor for HR-GNR positivity, odds ratio (95 % CI): 7.32 (1.82–29.35), p-value = 0.005. Conclusions Similar ESBL prevalence rates and genotypes (3.5 %) were found in comparison to other Dutch studies. When previously HR-GNR positive patients are readmitted, they should be screened for HR-GNR colonization since colonization with GR-GNRs could be prolonged. We recommend for future studies to include all defined HR-GNRs in addition to ESBLs in prevalence studies, in order to obtain a more comprehensive overview of colonization with HR-GNRs

Clinical Sensitivity, Specificity and Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 Serological Testing Using the Biozek COVID-19 Test

Background: Clinical validation using the Biozek COVID-19 test including sensitivity and specificity and associated patient-reported symptoms with SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity. Methods: 316 sera were analyzed including 47 hospitalized cases, 50 mild cases and 219 negative controls. Results were read visually by two technicians and in case of discrepancy by a third. Models were created between independent variables and IgG seropositivity using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: Sensitivity of both IgM and IgG together for hospitalized patients at all time periods was 68.1% (32/47) and 90.0% (27/30) after 10 days or more. From mild/asymptomatic cases the combined IgM and IgG sensitivity was 92.0% (46/50) and 91.8% (45/49) after 10 days or more. In the group of non-COVID-19 cases, the overall specificity was 99.1% (217/219). For IgG alone, the specificity was 99.5% (218/219). In the multivariable analysis loss of smell remained the strongest associated variable with an odds ratio (95%CI): 6.82 (5.61–8.31), p-value < 0.001. Our final prediction model yielded a ROC-AUC of 0.77 (0.74–0.81) showing acceptable discrimination. Conclusions: The Biozek COVID-19 test showed high specificity and good sensitivity 10 days after the first sickness day. Solely IgM positive tests must be interpreted with caution and preferably excluded. In order to capture most symptomatic COVID-19 cases, loss of smell should be included within symptomatic screening policies

Preventie van Legionella-pneumonie in Nederland ; Resultaten van de Bronopsporings Eenheid Legionella-pneumonie in 2002-2012.

To study the effectiveness of a Legionella pneumonia (LP) prevention programme

Results from the National Legionella Outbreak Detection Program, the Netherlands, 2002–2012

In 2002, the National Legionella Outbreak Detection Program was implemented in the Netherlands to detect and eliminate potential sources of organisms that cause Legionnaires’ disease (LD). During 2002–2012, a total of 1,991 patients with LD were reported, and 1,484 source investigations were performed. Of those sources investigated, 24.7% were positive for Legionella spp. For 266 patients with LD, 105 cluster locations were identified. A genotype match was made between a strain detected in 41 patients and a strain from a source location. Despite the systematic approach used by the program, most sources of LD infections during 2002–2012 remained undiscovered. Explorative studies are needed to identify yet undiscovered reservoirs and transmission routes for Legionella bacteria, and improved laboratory techniques are needed to detect Legionella spp. in samples with a high background of microbial flora (such as soil)

Costs and Benefits Associated with the MRSA Search and Destroy Policy in a Hospital in the Region Kennemerland, The Netherlands

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze the costs and benefits of the MRSA Search and Destroy (S&D) policy between 2008 and 2013 in the Kennemer Gasthuis, a 400 bed teaching hospital in the region Kennemerland, the Netherlands. METHODS: A patient registration database was used to retrospectively calculate costs, including screening, isolation, follow-up, contact tracing, cleaning, treatment, deployment of extra healthcare workers, salary for an infection control practitioner (ICP) and service of isolation rooms. The estimated benefits (costs and lives when no MRSA S&D was applied) were based on a varying MRSA prevalence rate (up to 50%). RESULTS: When no MRSA S&D policy was applied, the additional costs and deaths due to MRSA bacteraemia were estimated to be € 1,388,907 and 33 respectively (at a MRSA prevalence rate of 50%). Currently, the total costs were estimated to be € 290,672 (€ 48,445 annually) and a MRSA prevalence rate of 17.3% was considered as break-even point. Between 2008 and 2013, a total of 576 high risk patients were screened for MRSA carriage, of whom 19 (3.3%) were found to be MRSA positive. Forty-nine patients (72.1%) were found unexpectedly. CONCLUSIONS: Application of the MRSA S&D policy saves lives and money, although the high rate of unexpected MRSA cases is alarming

The use of in-hospital medical care for patients with metastasized colon, bronchus, or lung cancer

Purpose: At the end of life, patients and their families tend to favor adequate pain and symptom management and attention to comfort measures over prolongation of life. However, it has been suggested that many cancer patients without curative options still receive aggressive treatment. We therefore aimed to describe the number of diagnostic procedures, hospitalization, and medication use among these patients as well as factors associated with receiving such care. Methods: We conducted a cohort study on all patients with metastasized cancer from a primary colon or bronchus and lung (BL) neoplasm from the moment of first admittance (January–December 2017) to end of follow-up (November 2018) or death. Results: A total of 408 patients with colon (36%) or BL (64%) cancer were included in this study, with a median survival time of 7.4 months. 93% of the patients were subjected to at least one diagnostic procedure, 49% received chemotherapy, and 56% received expensive medication including immunotherapy. Patients had a median of 4.6 hospital admissions and 2.3 emergency room (ER) visits. A quarter of all patients (n = 105) received specialized palliative care with a mean of 1.96 consultations and the first consultation after a median time of 4.1 months. Patients with BL neoplasms received significantly more diagnostic procedures, chemotherapy episodes, ER/ICU admissions, and more often received an end-of-life statement per person-year than patients with a primary colon neoplasm. Females received significantly less diagnostic procedures and visited the ER/ICU less frequently than males, and patients aged > 70 years received significantly less chemotherapy (episodes) and expensive medication than younger patients. No differences in care were found between different socioeconomic status groups. Conclusion: Patients with metastasized colon or BL cancer receive a large amount of in-hospital medical care. Specialized palliative care was initiated relatively late despite the incurable disease status of all patients. Factors associated with more procedures were BL neoplasms, age between 50 and 70, and male gender