30 research outputs found

    Postoperative Critical Care for Cardiac Surgical Patients

    No full text
    XII, 440 p. 53 illus., 42 illus. in color.online

    Tricuspid valve repair using autologous pericardium annuloplasty in adults

    No full text
    Uncorrected functional tricuspid regurgitation can lead to long-term morbidity and mortality. To evaluate our results using autologous pericardium annuloplasty to treat tricuspid regurgitation, we retrospectively reviewed 59 consecutive adult patients aged 19 years to 83 years (58.7 +/- 15.5 years) who underwent tricuspid valve annuloplasty between 2000 and 2003. Concomitant procedures consisted of mitral valve surgery in 83% of patients, aortic valve surgery in 28%, coronary bypass in 31%, and atrial-septal defect correction in 28%. Annuloplasty was performed using a strip of pericardium treated in glutaraldehyde 0.6% for 10 min. Two rows of continuous horizontal mattress Gore-Tex sutures were used to secure the pericardium to the tricuspid annulus. Follow-up was performed in 100% of the patients, and the mean follow-up was 4.4 +/- 1.2 years (range, 2.4 to 7 years). Postoperative death within 30 days occurred in 1 of 59 patients (1.6%). None of the patients required reoperation related to tricuspid regurgitation or stenosis. The actuarial survival rate was 98.4% at 7 years after operation. Echocardiography was performed in 58 of 58 surviving patients (100%). Up to 7 years postoperatively, tricuspid regurgitation was trace in 67.2% of patients, mild in 31%, and moderate in 1.8%; there was no occurrence of severe regurgitation on follow-up. Our results indicate that autologous pericardium tricuspid annuloplasty is a useful procedure in patients with moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation. This procedure provides a durable, reproducible annuloplasty of the tricuspid valve

    Transcatheter aspiration of large pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead vegetations facilitating safe transvenous lead extraction

    Get PDF
    AIMS Treatment of patients with systemic cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection with large lead vegetations is challenging and associated with relevant morbidity and mortality. To avoid complications from open surgical extraction, a novel approach with percutaneous aspiration of large vegetations prior to transvenous lead extraction was instituted. The results of this treatment concept were retrospectively analysed in this multicentre study. METHODS AND RESULTS One hundred and one patients [mean age 68.2 ± 13.1 (30-92) years] were treated in four centres for endovascular CIED infection with large lead vegetations. Mean lead vegetation size was 30.7 ± 13.5 mm. Two hundred and forty-seven leads were targeted for extraction (170 pacemaker leads, 77 implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads). Mean lead implant duration was 81.7 (1-254) months. The transcatheter aspiration system with a specialized long venous drainage cannula and a funnel-shaped tip was based on a veno-venous extracorporeal circuit with an in-line filter. The aspiration of vegetations showed complete procedural success in 94.0% (n = 95), partial success in 5.0% (n = 5). Three major complications (3.0%) were encountered. Complete procedural success (per lead) of the subsequently performed transvenous lead extraction procedure was 99.2% (n = 245). Thirty-day mortality was 3.0% (n = 3). Five patients (5.0%) died in the further course on Days 51, 54, 68, 134, and 182 post-procedure (septic complications: n = 4; heart failure: n = 1). CONCLUSION The percutaneous aspiration procedure is highly effective and is associated with a low complication profile. The aspiration of vegetations immediately prior and during the lead extraction procedure may avoid septic embolization into the pulmonary circulation. This may potentially lead to a long-term survival benefit

    Heart transplant recipient 1-year outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic

    No full text
    The COVID-19 pandemic initially brought forth considerable challenges to the field of heart transplantation. To prevent the spread of the virus and protect immunocompromised recipients, our center made the following modifications to post-transplant outpatient management: eliminating early coronary angiograms, video visits for postoperative months 7, 9, and 11, and home blood draws for immunosuppression adjustments. To assess if these changes have impacted patient outcomes, the current study examines 1-year outcomes for patients transplanted during the pandemic. Between March and September 2020, we assessed 50 heart transplant patients transplanted during the pandemic. These patients were compared to patients who were transplanted during the same months between 2011 and 2019 (n = 482). Endpoints included subsequent 1-year survival, freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy, any-treated rejection, acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, nonfatal major adverse cardiac events (NF-MACE), and hospital and ICU length of stay. Patients transplanted during the pandemic had similar 1-year endpoints compared to those of patients transplanted from years prior apart from 1-year freedom from NF-MACE which was significantly higher for patients transplanted during the pandemic. Despite necessary changes being made to outpatient management of heart transplant recipients, heart transplantation continues to be safe and effective with similar 1-year outcomes to years prior
    corecore