Change detection of isolated housing using a new hybrid approach based on object classification with optical and TerraSAR-X data

Optical and microwave high spatial resolution images are now available for a wide range of applications. In this work, they have been applied for the semi-automatic change detection of isolated housing in agricultural areas. This article presents a new hybrid methodology based on segmentation of high-resolution images and image differencing. This new approach mixes the main techniques used in change detection methods and it also adds a final segmentation process in order to classify the change detection product. First, isolated building classification is carried out using only optical data. Then, synthetic aperture radar (SAR) information is added to the classification process, obtaining excellent results with lower complexity cost. Since the first classification step is improved, the total change detection scheme is also enhanced when the radar data are used for classification. Finally, a comparison between the different methods is presented and some conclusions are extracted from the study. © 2011 Taylor & Francis.Vidal Pantaleoni, A.; Moreno Cambroreno, MDR. (2011). Change detection of isolated housing using a new hybrid approach based on object classification with optical and TerraSAR-X data. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 32(24):9621-9635. doi:10.1080/01431161.2011.571297S962196353224BLAES, X., VANHALLE, L., & DEFOURNY, P. (2005). Efficiency of crop identification based on optical and SAR image time series. Remote Sensing of Environment, 96(3-4), 352-365. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2005.03.010Chen, Y., Shi, P., Fung, T., Wang, J., & Li, X. (2007). Object‐oriented classification for urban land cover mapping with ASTER imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(20), 4645-4651. doi:10.1080/01431160500444731Dalla Mura, M., Benediktsson, J. A., Bovolo, F., & Bruzzone, L. (2008). An Unsupervised Technique Based on Morphological Filters for Change Detection in Very High Resolution Images. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 5(3), 433-437. doi:10.1109/lgrs.2008.917726Dell’Acqua, F., & Gamba, P. (2006). Discriminating urban environments using multiscale texture and multiple SAR images. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(18), 3797-3812. doi:10.1080/01431160600557572Haralick, R. M., Shanmugam, K., & Dinstein, I. (1973). Textural Features for Image Classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-3(6), 610-621. doi:10.1109/tsmc.1973.4309314Im, J., Jensen, J. R., & Tullis, J. A. (2008). Object‐based change detection using correlation image analysis and image segmentation. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(2), 399-423. doi:10.1080/01431160601075582Lhomme, S., He, D., Weber, C., & Morin, D. (2009). A new approach to building identification from very‐high‐spatial‐resolution images. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30(5), 1341-1354. doi:10.1080/01431160802509017LOBO, A., CHIC, O., & CASTERAD, A. (1996). Classification of Mediterranean crops with multisensor data: per-pixel versus per-object statistics and image segmentation. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(12), 2385-2400. doi:10.1080/01431169608948779Lu, D., Mausel, P., Brondízio, E., & Moran, E. (2004). Change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(12), 2365-2401. doi:10.1080/0143116031000139863Shimabukuro, Y. E., Almeida‐Filho, R., Kuplich, T. M., & de Freitas, R. M. (2007). Quantifying optical and SAR image relationships for tropical landscape features in the Amazônia. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(17), 3831-3840. doi:10.1080/01431160701236829Stramondo, S., Bignami, C., Chini, M., Pierdicca, N., & Tertulliani, A. (2006). Satellite radar and optical remote sensing for earthquake damage detection: results from different case studies. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(20), 4433-4447. doi:10.1080/01431160600675895Yuan, D., & Elvidge, C. D. (1996). Comparison of relative radiometric normalization techniques. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 51(3), 117-126. doi:10.1016/0924-2716(96)00018-