13 research outputs found
Making stillbirths visible: a systematic review of globally reported causes of stillbirth
BACKGROUND:
Stillbirth is a global health problem. The World Health Organization (WHO) application of the International Classification of Diseases for perinatal mortality (ICDāPM) aims to improve data on stillbirth to enable prevention.
OBJECTIVES:
To identify globally reported causes of stillbirth, classification systems, and alignment with the ICDāPM.
SEARCH STRATEGY:
We searched CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, Global Health, and Pubmed from 2009 to 2016.
SELECTION CRITERIA:
Reports of stillbirth causes in unselective cohorts.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:
Pooled estimates of causes were derived for country representative reports. Systems and causes were assessed for alignment with the ICDāPM. Data are presented by income setting (low, middle, and high income countries; LIC, MIC, HIC).
MAIN RESULTS:
Eightyāfive reports from 50 countries (489 089 stillbirths) were included. The most frequent categories were Unexplained, Antepartum haemorrhage, and Other (all settings); Infection and Hypoxic peripartum (LIC), and Placental (MIC, HIC). Overall report quality was low. Only one classification system fully aligned with ICDāPM. All stillbirth causes mapped to ICDāPM. In a subset from HIC, mapping obscured major causes.
CONCLUSIONS:
There is a paucity of quality information on causes of stillbirth globally. Improving investigation of stillbirths and standardisation of audit and classification is urgently needed and should be achievable in all wellāresourced settings. Implementation of the WHO Perinatal Mortality Audit and Review guide is needed, particularly across high burden settings.
FUNDING:
HR, SH, SHL, and AW were supported by an NHMRCāCRE grant (APP1116640). VF was funded by an NHMRCāCDF (APP1123611)
Characteristics of a global classification system for perinatal deaths: a Delphi consensus study
BACKGROUND: Despite the global burden of perinatal deaths, there is currently no single, globally-acceptable classification system for perinatal deaths. Instead, multiple, disparate systems are in use world-wide. This inconsistency hinders accurate estimates of causes of death and impedes effective prevention strategies. The World Health Organisation (WHO) is developing a globally-acceptable classification approach for perinatal deaths. To inform this work, we sought to establish a consensus on the important characteristics of such a system. METHODS: A group of international experts in the classification of perinatal deaths were identified and invited to join an expert panel to develop a list of important characteristics of a quality global classification system for perinatal death. A Delphi consensus methodology was used to reach agreement. Three rounds of consultation were undertaken using a purpose built on-line survey. Round one sought suggested characteristics for subsequent scoring and selection in rounds two and three. RESULTS: The panel of experts agreed on a total of 17 important characteristics for a globally-acceptable perinatal death classification system. Of these, 10 relate to the structural design of the system and 7 relate to the functional aspects and use of the system. CONCLUSION: This study serves as formative work towards the development of a globally-acceptable approach for the classification of the causes of perinatal deaths. The list of functional and structural characteristics identified should be taken into consideration when designing and developing such a system