РОЛЬ БИОБАНКОВ В ИЗУЧЕНИИ ПОПУЛЯЦИОННОГО ИММУНИТЕТА

Review focuses on estimation of population immunity and  effectiveness of vaccination against socially significant influenza  infection. Long-term observations of the population immunity,  including post-vaccine seroprevalence to influenza are an important  component of surveillance. The possibility of use of systems of  biological banks (biobanks) in these investigations is of great  interest. The data on the principles of biobanks design in the world,  the scope of their application, the present state of the industry are  described. The information about collections of infectious diseases  agents is presented. Suggestions to build a network of biobanks in the Russian Federation and its implementation in the system of  epidemiological influenza surveillance are formed. The biobanks  filling by samples, principles of selection of donors biological  specimens, methods of laboratory research are discussed.Обзор посвящен оценке популяционного иммунитета и эффективности вакцинации против  грипп. Многолетние наблюдения за коллективным (популяционным) иммунитетом, включая  поствакцинальный, при гриппе остаются важной составляющей эпидемиологического надзора. Новые возможности в исследовании популяционного  иммунитета открываются с созданием системы биологических банков (биобанков).  Приводятся данные по принципам построения биобанков в мире, сферы их применения,  современное состояние данной отрасли. Представлены сведения о коллекциях возбудителей инфекционных заболеваний. Даны предложения по построению сети  биобанков в Российской Федерации с внедрением в систему эпидемиологического надзора  за вирусными заболеваниями. Обсуждается структура наполняемости биобанков образцами, принципы подбора доноров биологических образцов,  методы их лабораторного изучения

Two years of experience in hospital surveillance for the severe influenza like illnesses in St. Petersburg: etiology, clinical characterization of diseases, antigenic and genetic properties of isolated influenza viruses

In this paper, we analyze the etiology of the diseases occurring during two consecutive influenza epidemic seasons in St. Petersburg, Russian Federation. The analysis is based on the results of the PCR diagnostics of the clinical samples collected from patients hospitalized in three St. Petersburg hospitals with influenza like illnesses (ILI). It was shown that the influenza virus A(H1N1)pdm09 was the dominant causative agent during the 2012-2013 epidemic season while, in the 2013-2014 season, A(H3N2) virus was predominant among adults and children. The influenza B virus activity was high in the 2012-2013 season and low in the 2013-2014 season. During both seasons, the main causative agent for the hospitalization of young children was respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), followed by rhinovirus and influenza virus. The rate of involvement of parainfluenza, adenovirus, metapneumovirus and coronavirus was low and was negligible for bocavirus. Children 0-2 and 3-6 years old formed the group of patients that was affected by acute respiratory infection agents the most. Children younger than 3 months old were the major group of the intensive care unit (ICUs) patients and only 27.5% of them were adults. RSV and rhinovirus were the leading cause of ILI among the children admitted to ICU. Among the adult patients admitted to the ICU, only influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2) and B viruses were detected during both influenza seasons.According to the results of the antigenic and genetic analysis, most influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) viruses circulating in St. Petersburg matched the vaccine strains recommended by the WHO for vaccine composition in the 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 seasons.In this paper, we analyze the etiology of the diseases occurring during two consecutive influenza epidemic seasons in St. Petersburg, Russian Federation. The analysis is based on the results of the PCR diagnostics of the clinical samples collected from patients hospitalized in three St. Petersburg hospitals with influenza like illnesses (ILI). It was shown that the influenza virus A(H1N1)pdm09 was the dominant causative agent during the 2012-2013 epidemic season while, in the 2013-2014 season, A(H3N2) virus was predominant among adults and children. The influenza B virus activity was high in the 2012-2013 season and low in the 2013-2014 season. During both seasons, the main causative agent for the hospitalization of young children was respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), followed by rhinovirus and influenza virus. The rate of involvement of parainfluenza, adenovirus, metapneumovirus and coronavirus was low and was negligible for bocavirus. Children 0-2 and 3-6 years old formed the group of patients that was affected by acute respiratory infection agents the most. Children younger than 3 months old were the major group of the intensive care unit (ICUs) patients and only 27.5% of them were adults. RSV and rhinovirus were the leading cause of ILI among the children admitted to ICU. Among the adult patients admitted to the ICU, only influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2) and B viruses were detected during both influenza seasons. According to the results of the antigenic and genetic analysis, most influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) viruses circulating in St. Petersburg matched the vaccine strains recommended by the WHO for vaccine composition in the 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 seasons

Антигенное разнообразие вирусов гриппа А и В, выделенных от детей в г. Санкт-Петербурге в период с 2013 по 2015 г.

Purpose of the study: study of the circulation, isolation and antigenic analysis of influenza viruses A and B in St.-Petersburg in the children aged 0–18 in the seasons 2013–2015.Materials: nasal swabs from children-inpatients from Saint-Petersburg.Methods: virus isolation in MDCK cell culture and chicken embryos, antigenic analysis with the hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) test with the set of hyper-immune rat antisera to the epidemic and reference strains, antigenic cartography.Results: The epidemic seasons 2013–2015 were characterized by the co-circulation in children in St.-Petersburg of influenza sub-types А(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2), and B of Yamagata lineage (B yam). In the season 2014–2015 the low activity of epidemic process was observed with the predominant sub-type A(H3N2) and in the next season – 2014–2015 with the more pronounced epidemic activity – the pre-dominance of B yam viruses. Antigenic analysis of influenza viruses А(H1N1)pdm09 which circulated in children revealed their antigenic homogeneity and full correspondence with vaccine strain A/California/07/09. As for А(H3N2) viruses, two antigenic groups were established: strains similar to A/St.-Petersburg/80/14 (sub-clade 3C.2a) and strains similar to A/Switzerland/9715293/13 (sub-clade 3C.3a). А(Н3N2) strains of the season 2013-2014 were similar to the vaccine strain. However isolates of the season 2014-2015 did not fit to the vaccine strain because in the children were predominant strains similar to the evolution branch A/St.-Petersburg/80/14 while according the WHO recommendations the influenza vaccine contained the strain A/Texas/50/12. Antigenic analysis of influenza viruses B showed their homogeneity and all they were B/Phuket/3073/13-like. Influenza strains B also incompletely corresponded to the vaccine strain – B/Massachusetts/2/12 belonging to the different genetic sub-clade. That might be the reason of enhanced morbidity of children with influenza B in the last season.Conclusion: The obtained results stress the urgency for the wide coverage of human population with the epidemic studies, virus isolation in different time periods and geographic regions and their etiological studies with the modern techniques. Only in these conditions we can assure high efficiency of flu seasonal vaccines.Цель исследования: особенности циркуляции, выделение и антигенный анализ вирусов гриппа А и В в Санкт-Петербурге в 2013–2015 гг. от детей от 0 до 18 лет.Материалы исследования: назальные мазки от детей из стационаров и закрытых детских учреждений Санкт-Петербурга.Методы: выделение вирусов на культуре клеток MDCK и куриных эмбрионах, антигенный анализ методом реакции торможения гемагглютинации (РТГА) с набором гипериммунных крысиных антисывороток к эталонным и эпидемическим штаммам гриппа, антигенная картография.Результаты: в эпидемические сезоны 2013–2015 гг. в г. Санкт-Петербурге среди детей была выявлена совместная циркуляция вирусов гриппа А(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2), B Ямагатской линии (B yam), причем в сезоне 2013–2014 гг. при общей невысокой активности эпидемического процесса преобладали вирусы A(H3N2), а в следующем эпидемическом сезоне – 2014–2015 гг. – при более высокой интенсивности эпидемии – вирусы В yam. Антигенный анализ вирусов А(H1N1)pdm09, циркулировавших среди детей, выявил их антигенную однородность и полное соответствие вакцинному штамму А/Калифорния/07/09. Зафиксирован антигенный дрейф вирусов А(H3N2), выявлены 2 антигенные группы: вирусы, подобные А/Санкт-Петербург/80/14 (генетическая подгруппа 3С.2а) и вирусы, подобные А/Швейцария/9715293/13 (подгруппа 3С.3а). Вирусы А(Н3N2) сезона 2013–2014 гг. были подобны вакцинному штамму. В то же время изоляты сезона 2014–2015 гг. не соответствовали вакцинному штамму, поскольку среди детей в основном выявлены штаммы, подобные эволюционной ветви А/Санкт-Петербург/80/14, а в вакцину по рекомендации ВОЗ был включен штамм А/Техас/50/12. Антигенный анализ вирусов гриппа В yam показал их однородность, они были подобны эталонному вирусу В/Пхукет/3073/13. Вирусы В также антигенно не полностью соответствовали вакцинному компоненту, поскольку данные вирусы были подобны штамму В/Пхукет/3073/13, а в состав вакцины входил штамм В/Массачусетс/2/12, принадлежащий к другой генетической подгруппе, что могло привести к повышению заболеваемости детей гриппом типа В в данном сезоне. Заключение: для своевременного правильного выбора штаммов, входящих в состав сезонных противогриппозных вакцин, по-прежнему актуальной остается задача как можно более широкого охвата населения эпидемиологическими исследованиями, выделения вирусов в разные периоды эпидемического сезона и в разных географических регионах, их антигенный и генетический анализ современными методами

Role of biobanks in the study of population immunity

Review focuses on estimation of population immunity and  effectiveness of vaccination against socially significant influenza  infection. Long-term observations of the population immunity,  including post-vaccine seroprevalence to influenza are an important  component of surveillance. The possibility of use of systems of  biological banks (biobanks) in these investigations is of great  interest. The data on the principles of biobanks design in the world,  the scope of their application, the present state of the industry are  described. The information about collections of infectious diseases  agents is presented. Suggestions to build a network of biobanks in the Russian Federation and its implementation in the system of  epidemiological influenza surveillance are formed. The biobanks  filling by samples, principles of selection of donors biological  specimens, methods of laboratory research are discussed

The Epidemiological Situation of Influenza in the World and Russia in the Season 2014 – 2015

Comparison of spatial-temporal spread of influenza in the Northern and southern hemispheres according to the WHO and the analysis of the epidemic of influenza in Russia in the 2014 – 2015 season, according to the research Institute of influenza on the incidence of influenza and ARI in 59 cities of Russia.It is shown that in the season 2014 – 2015 in the Northern hemisphere, the intensity of the epidemics was higher in North America and Europe than East Asia and North Africa. In the Southern hemisphere have experienced low influenza activity. In the etiology of epidemics in countries of both hemispheres was dominated by influenza A(H3N2) and influenza B. The proportion of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 was less in the Southern hemisphere was higher than in Northern countries. The incidence of influenza A(H3N2) in the Northern hemisphere was predominantly linked to the new strain A/Switzerland/9715293/2013 (H3N2), differing from the vaccine. In Europe, the majority of circulating influenza B strains were related to the strain B/Phuket/3073/2013, did not match the vaccine.In Russia the intensity of the influenza epidemic in 2015, was more than the previous epidemic of 2014, the prevalence in the cities, the morbidity especially children 7 – 14 years of age and adult population, the incidence of hospitalization with a diagnosis of «influenza» and the number of deaths

Antigenic variability of influenza viruses A and B isolated from children in Saint-Petersburg in the period 2013–2015

Purpose of the study: study of the circulation, isolation and antigenic analysis of influenza viruses A and B in St.-Petersburg in the children aged 0–18 in the seasons 2013–2015.Materials: nasal swabs from children-inpatients from Saint-Petersburg.Methods: virus isolation in MDCK cell culture and chicken embryos, antigenic analysis with the hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) test with the set of hyper-immune rat antisera to the epidemic and reference strains, antigenic cartography.Results: The epidemic seasons 2013–2015 were characterized by the co-circulation in children in St.-Petersburg of influenza sub-types А(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2), and B of Yamagata lineage (B yam). In the season 2014–2015 the low activity of epidemic process was observed with the predominant sub-type A(H3N2) and in the next season – 2014–2015 with the more pronounced epidemic activity – the pre-dominance of B yam viruses. Antigenic analysis of influenza viruses А(H1N1)pdm09 which circulated in children revealed their antigenic homogeneity and full correspondence with vaccine strain A/California/07/09. As for А(H3N2) viruses, two antigenic groups were established: strains similar to A/St.-Petersburg/80/14 (sub-clade 3C.2a) and strains similar to A/Switzerland/9715293/13 (sub-clade 3C.3a). А(Н3N2) strains of the season 2013-2014 were similar to the vaccine strain. However isolates of the season 2014-2015 did not fit to the vaccine strain because in the children were predominant strains similar to the evolution branch A/St.-Petersburg/80/14 while according the WHO recommendations the influenza vaccine contained the strain A/Texas/50/12. Antigenic analysis of influenza viruses B showed their homogeneity and all they were B/Phuket/3073/13-like. Influenza strains B also incompletely corresponded to the vaccine strain – B/Massachusetts/2/12 belonging to the different genetic sub-clade. That might be the reason of enhanced morbidity of children with influenza B in the last season.Conclusion: The obtained results stress the urgency for the wide coverage of human population with the epidemic studies, virus isolation in different time periods and geographic regions and their etiological studies with the modern techniques. Only in these conditions we can assure high efficiency of flu seasonal vaccines

SUMMARY OF INFLUENZA AND OTHER RESPIRATORY VIRUSES DETECTED AND CHARACTERIZED IN RUSSIA DURING 2017–2018 SEASON

Abstract. The influenza season 2017–2018 started significantly later compared to the five previous seasons. Influenza epidemic lasted for 12 weeks (weeks 6–17), was of moderate intensity and 10,4% of the population of the country was involved with children aged 0–2 and 3–6 years being the most affected groups as usually. The average hospitalization rate of patients with ILI and ARI was 2,6% and was the highest in infants aged 0–2 years (5,4%). The number of influenzaassociated deaths was two times higher this season compared to 2016–2017 which can be attributed to the circulation of A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses that still is the major cause of lethal influenza outcomes in the country. A total 72 759 patients were investigated by RT-PCR in 55 collaborating RBLs. Laboratory confirmed influenza (LCI) was detected in 12 149 (20.7%) cases, of which 39.3% were influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses, 29.6% were A(H3N2) and 31.1% influenza B (Yamagata lineage) viruses. The first cases of influenza viruses were detected at the very beginning of the season (weeks 40–45.2017), however a distinct increase in the rate of detection was registered only from the week 2.2018 with the peak on the week 13–14.2018 and subsequent gradual decline up to the end of the season. The certain differences in the etiology of morbidity between Federal Districts were registered. The impact of influenza and other ARI agents in different stage of epidemic was determined. In the pre-epidemic period, the incidence growth was occurred mainly due to ARI agents (about 32,7%), especially due to rhinoviruses (RhV) and RSV (10.2 and 8.0% cases, respectively) while LCI were registered in 3.4% only. During the epidemic, the rate of LCI detection increased up to 29.2% at simultaneous decrease in frequency of parainfluenza, adenovirus, bocavirus, coronavirus and, especially, rhinoviruses, to a lesser extent RSV infection. In the post-epidemic period, the role of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2) and В viruses decreased up to 6.1; 6.9 and 3.6%, respectively, with increase of rhinoviruses (9.5% of diseases). Genetic analysis of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) viruses circulating in 2017–2018 season showed that all analyzed viruses by the structure of surface genes encoding antigenic determinants, in difference from influenza B viruses, corresponded to the vaccine strains recommended by WHO for the Northern Hemisphere for 2017–2018 epidemic season. However, significant changes in the internal genes of circulating viruses were revealed. The control of the susceptibility of 316 influenza A and B viruses to antiviral drugs showed that the absolute majority of them (99.7%) retained their susceptibility to neuraminidase inhibitors