54 research outputs found

    The Insulin Signaling Activity Controls Organ Size in a Compartment-Specific Manner

    No full text
    <div><p>Mosaic Drosophila wings with compartment-specific manipulations of dAkt function display striking size defects but normal patterning.</p> <p>(A) Selective reduction of dAkt function in the posterior compartment by means of FLP-mediated mitotic recombination in posterior cells (using <i>engrailed–Gal4</i> to drive the expression of <i>UAS–Flp</i>) results in a small P compartment largely consisting of <i>dAkt<sup>3</sup></i> mutant cells. The smaller compartment size is due to fewer and smaller cells.</p> <p>(B) Wild-type wing for comparison.</p> <p>(C) Expression of dAkt in posterior cells (<i>engrailed–Gal4 UAS–dAkt</i>) of wings with reduced dAkt function (<i>dAkt<sup>3</sup></i>) restores the size of the P compartment, whereas the A compartment remains small. The red lines mark the anterior–posterior compartment boundary. Note that similar results in the wing disc have been obtained by <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.0000086#pbio.0000086-Teleman1" target="_blank">Teleman and Cohen (2000)</a>.</p></div

    Changing the Patterning Mechansims during Wing Development Affects Growth

    No full text
    <p>Compared with a wild-type wing (A), loss of Dpp function results in reduced growth and loss of pattern elements (B). Ectopic expression of Dpp in a clone of cells results in pattern duplications associated with massive extra growth (C). The region of Dpp expression in (A) and (C) is indicated by the green color. (<a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.0000086#pbio.0000086-Zecca1" target="_blank">Zecca et al. 1995</a>; pictures courtesy of B. Müller and K. Basler.)</p

    Model for the Coordinated Control of Growth and Patterning in the Drosophila Wing Disc

    No full text
    <p>A schematic representation of a growing (left) and a mature (right) wing disc is shown at the top. Corresponding cross-sections through the wing blade region are depicted below. The wing disc originates from the infolding of the embryonic ectoderm and consists of pseudostratified epithelial cells containing a basal–lateral side (yellow) and an apical side (red). The apical surface faces the disc lumen that is formed by the epithelium and the overlaying peripodial membrane (black), consisting of squamous epithelial cells. The morphogen and growth factor Dpp (yellow) is secreted basal–laterally by the Dpp-producing cells located anterior to the anterior–posterior compartment boundary (line through centre of wing disc). The Dpp concentration gradient from the anterior–posterior boundary to the periphery provides the anterior–posterior patterning cues. In addition, Dpp is also secreted apically into the disc lumen where is can diffuse freely. The model proposes that luminal Dpp acts as a growth-promoting factor stimulating disc growth in young discs. As the disc grows, a hypothetical growth inhibitor (blue dots) is also secreted apically and antagonizes the growth promoting activity of Dpp. Once the concentration of the inhibitor has reached a certain threshold, proliferation of wing imaginal disc cells ceases.</p

    The RNA-binding Proteins FMR1, Rasputin and Caprin Act Together with the UBA Protein Lingerer to Restrict Tissue Growth in <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>

    Get PDF
    <div><p>Appropriate expression of growth-regulatory genes is essential to ensure normal animal development and to prevent diseases like cancer. Gene regulation at the levels of transcription and translational initiation mediated by the Hippo and Insulin signaling pathways and by the TORC1 complex, respectively, has been well documented. Whether translational control mediated by RNA-binding proteins contributes to the regulation of cellular growth is less clear. Here, we identify Lingerer (Lig), an UBA domain-containing protein, as growth suppressor that associates with the RNA-binding proteins Fragile X mental retardation protein 1 (FMR1) and Caprin (Capr) and directly interacts with and regulates the RNA-binding protein Rasputin (Rin) in <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>. <i>lig</i> mutant organs overgrow due to increased proliferation, and a reporter for the JAK/STAT signaling pathway is upregulated in a <i>lig</i> mutant situation. <i>rin</i>, <i>Capr</i> or <i>FMR1</i> in combination as double mutants, but not the respective single mutants, display <i>lig</i> like phenotypes, implicating a redundant function of Rin, Capr and FMR1 in growth control in epithelial tissues. Thus, Lig regulates cell proliferation during development in concert with Rin, Capr and FMR1.</p></div

    JAK/STAT signaling is activated in <i>lig</i> mutant cells.

    No full text
    <p>(A–C) <i>lig<sup>1</sup></i> mutant clones (induced with the FLP/FRT system, 72 h old, marked by the lack of lacZ staining) in eye (A and A''), antenna (B and B'') and wing (C and C'') imaginal discs of early third instar larvae. The JAK/STAT signaling reporter 10xSTAT92E-GFP is upregulated in <i>lig1</i> mutant clones in the posterior side of the eye imaginal disc (A' and A''), antenna imaginal disc (B' and B'') and in the hinge region of the wing disc (C' and C''). Note that the reporter signal is autonomously increased in the mutant clones. Scale bars represent 50 µm. (D) Schematic representation of the interactions shown in this study (left) and a working model of a Lig/Rin/FMR1/Caprin complex (right). Genotypes: (A–C) <i>y w hsFLP</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>FRT42 arm-lacZ</i>/<i>FRT42 lig<sup>1</sup></i>; <i>10xSTAT92E-GFP</i>/+.</p

    Capr cooperates with FMR1 and Rin to suppress growth.

    No full text
    <p>(A–B) Scanning electron micrographs of adult control (A) and <i>Capr<sup>2</sup></i> (B) eyes generated by eyFLP/FRT Minute mediated mitotic recombination from flies reared on 25% yeast food (A–B). Scale bar represents 100 µm. (C) Statistical analyses as described in <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003598#pgen-1003598-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1D</a>: control (772±22 and 765±15) and <i>Capr<sup>2</sup></i> (754±18; p = 0.11 and 738±26; p = 0.04) mutant eyes from flies raised on 25% yeast-containing food. (D–K) Scanning electron micrographs of adult control (D), <i>Capr<sup>RNAi</sup></i> (E), <i>FMR1<sup>D113M</sup></i> (F), <i>Capr<sup>RNAi</sup> FMR1<sup>D113M</sup></i> (G), <i>rin<sup>2</sup></i> (H), <i>Capr<sup>RNAi</sup> rin<sup>2</sup></i> (I), <i>FMR1<sup>D113M</sup> rin<sup>2</sup></i> (J) and <i>Capr<sup>RNAi</sup> FMR1<sup>D113M</sup> rin<sup>2</sup></i> eyes (K) generated by eyFLP, Actin-Flp out-Gal4/FRT-mediated mitotic recombination from flies grown on 25% yeast-containing food. Scale bar represents 100 µm. (L) Statistical analyses as described in <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003598#pgen-1003598-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1D</a>: control (753±28 and 724±31), <i>Capr<sup>RNAi</sup></i> expressing (733±34 and 706±28), <i>FMR1<sup>D113M</sup></i> mutant (720±18 and 736±19), <i>Capr<sup>RNAi</sup></i> expressing <i>FMR1<sup>D113M</sup></i> mutant (789±20; p = 1.82E-05 and 787±14; p = 0.00015), <i>rin<sup>2</sup></i> mutant (782±18 and 779±13) and <i>Capr<sup>RNAi</sup></i> expressing <i>rin<sup>2</sup></i> mutant (837±52; p = 0.033 and 843±53; p = 0.018) eyes from flies raised on 25% yeast-containing food. Genotypes: (A) <i>y w eyFLP</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>M(3)RpS17<sup>4</sup> FRT80</i>/<i>FRT80</i> (B) <i>y w eyFLP</i>/<i>w</i>; <i>M(3)RpS17<sup>4</sup> FRT80</i>/<i>Capr<sup>2</sup> FRT80</i> (D) <i>y w eyFLP</i>, <i>Act>CD2>Gal4</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>FRT82 cl w<sup>+</sup></i>/<i>FRT82</i> (E) <i>y w eyFLP</i>, <i>Act>CD2>Gal4</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>UAS-Capr<sup>RNAi</sup></i>/+; <i>FRT82 cl w<sup>+</sup></i>/+ (F) <i>y w eyFLP</i>, <i>Act>CD2>Gal4</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>FRT82 cl w<sup>+</sup></i>/<i>FRT82 FMR1<sup>D113M</sup></i> (G) <i>y w eyFLP</i>, <i>Act>CD2>Gal4</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>UAS-Capr<sup>RNAi</sup></i>/+; <i>FRT82 cl w<sup>+</sup></i>/<i>FRT82 FMR1<sup>D113M</sup></i> (H) <i>y w eyFLP</i>, <i>Act>CD2>Gal4</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>FRT82 cl w<sup>+</sup></i>/<i>FRT82 rin<sup>2</sup></i> (I) <i>y w eyFLP</i>, <i>Act>CD2>Gal4</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>UAS-Capr<sup>RNAi</sup></i>/+; <i>FRT82 cl w<sup>+</sup></i>/<i>FRT82 rin<sup>2</sup></i> (J) <i>y w eyFLP</i>, <i>Act>CD2>Gal4</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>FRT82 cl w<sup>+</sup></i>/<i>FRT82 FMR1<sup>D113M</sup> rin<sup>2</sup></i> (K) <i>y w eyFLP</i>, <i>Act>CD2>Gal4</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>UAS-Capr<sup>RNAi</sup></i>/+; <i>FRT82 cl w<sup>+</sup></i>/<i>FRT82 FMR1<sup>D113M</sup> rin<sup>2</sup></i>.</p

    Lig regulates organ size during development.

    No full text
    <p>(A–C) Scanning electron micrographs of the control (A), <i>lig</i> mutant overgrown eyes (B), and <i>lig</i> mutant eyes rescued by one copy of <i>Glig</i> (C). The mutant eyes were generated by eyFLP/FRT-mediated mitotic recombination. Scale bar represents 100 µm. (D) Quantification of ommatidia number from two independent experiments. Statistical analyses were done with a Student's t test (two-tailed, unpaired). Error bars indicate the standard deviations, (n) number of organs analyzed. Mean ± s.d. and p-values: Control (808±27 and 780±20), <i>lig</i> mutant eyes (856±23; p = 0.0027 and 806±28; p = 0.031) and <i>lig</i> mutant eyes with one copy of a genomic rescue transgene for <i>lig</i> (ND (not determined) and 768±9; p = 0.0011). (E–F) <i>lig<sup>1</sup></i> in combination with <i>lig<sup>PP1</sup></i>, a <i>lig</i> null mutant allele, causes long, slender pupae (F) in comparison to the control (E). Scale bar represents 500 µm. (G) Tangential eye sections of adult <i>lig<sup>1</sup></i> mosaic eyes reveal normal differentiation and cell size in <i>lig<sup>1</sup></i> mutant clones. The <i>lig<sup>1</sup></i> mutant cells are marked by the absence of pigmentation. (H–M) Scanning electron micrographs of adult control and <i>lig<sup>1</sup></i> mutant eyes generated by eyFLP/FRT-mediated mitotic recombination from flies grown on 25% (H–I), 100% (J–K) or 400% (L–M') yeast-containing food. Scale bar represents 100 µm. (N) Statistical analyses as described in <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003598#pgen-1003598-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1D</a>: control (690±39 and 726±21) and <i>lig<sup>1</sup></i> mutant (729±27; p = 0.022 and 789±20; p = 2.35E-05) eyes at 25% yeast-containing food, control (763±23 and 749±23) and <i>lig<sup>1</sup></i> mutant (747±47; p = 0.33 and 761±43; p = 0.46) eyes at 100% yeast-containing food, and control (708±38 and 719±43) and <i>lig<sup>1</sup></i> mutant (688±53; p = 0.35 and 700±75; p = 0.48) eyes at 400% yeast-containing food. (O–R) Scanning electron micrographs of adult control (O), <i>lig<sup>1</sup></i> mutant (P), <i>DIAP1</i> overexpressing (Q) and <i>lig<sup>1</sup></i> mutant <i>DIAP1</i> overexpressing eye (R) generated by eyFLP, Actin-Flp out-Gal4/FRT-mediated mitotic recombination. Scale bar represents 100 µm. (S) Statistical analyses as described in <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003598#pgen-1003598-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1D</a>: control (752±7 and 751±35), <i>lig<sup>1</sup></i> mutant (750±29; p = 0.85 and 770±40; p = 0.36), <i>DIAP1</i> overexpressing (768±12; p = 0.016 and 766±14; p = 0.34) and <i>lig<sup>1</sup></i> mutant <i>DIAP1</i> overexpressing (855±64; p = 0.0053 and 840±42; p = 0.0011) eyes. (T–U) Scanning electron micrographs of adult <i>p35</i> overexpressing (T) and <i>lig<sup>1</sup></i> mutant <i>p35</i> overexpressing eyes (U) generated by eyFLP, Actin-Flp out-Gal4/FRT-mediated mitotic recombination. Scale bar represents 100 µm. (V–X) Wings overexpressing the indicated UAS transgenes under the control of <i>nub-Gal4</i>. Scale bar represents 100 µm. (Y) Statistical analyses of wing area (as described in <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003598#pgen-1003598-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1D</a>) of wings overexpressing a control <i>UAS-RNAi</i> transgene (371±17.7 and 363±12.9), <i>UAS-lig<sup>RNAi I</sup></i> (393±9.9; p = 1.28E-03 and 366.8±12.4; p = 0.41) and <i>UAS-lig<sup>RNAi II</sup></i> (418.5±7.6; p = 9.47E-06 and 399.3±16.6; p = 2.14E-04). (Z) The <i>lig</i> locus (drawn to scale) spans 11.5 kbp and consists of 14 protein-coding exons. <i>lig<sup>1</sup></i> and <i>lig<sup>2</sup></i> are small deletions in the third exon resulting in a frameshift and premature stop codon. <i>lig<sup>3</sup></i> contains a premature stop codon in the second exon. The RNAi lines I and II are specific for exon 3 and for exons 11 and 12, respectively. The genomic rescue construct <i>Glig</i> includes 12 kbp. <i>Glig<sup>FS</sup></i> lacks a nucleotide in exon 10 leading to a frameshift and a premature stop. Genotypes: (A) <i>y w eyFLP</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>FRT42 cl w<sup>+</sup></i>/<i>FRT42</i> (B) <i>y w eyFLP</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>FRT42 cl w<sup>+</sup></i>/<i>FRT42 lig<sup>1</sup></i> (C) <i>y w eyFLP</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>FRT42 cl w<sup>+</sup></i>/<i>FRT42 lig<sup>1</sup></i>; <i>Glig</i> [61B3]/+ (E) <i>y w</i>; <i>lig<sup>PP1</sup></i>/<i>FRT42</i> (F) <i>y w</i>; <i>lig<sup>PP1</sup></i>/<i>FRT42 lig<sup>1</sup></i> (G) <i>y w hsFlp</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>FRT42 w<sup>+</sup></i>/<i>FRT42 lig<sup>1</sup></i> (H, J and L) <i>y w eyFLP</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>FRT42 P{SUPor-P}VhaAC45<sup>KG02272</sup></i> (cl)/<i>FRT42</i> (I, K, M and M') <i>y w eyFLP</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>FRT42 P{SUPor-P}VhaAC45<sup>KG02272</sup></i> (cl)/<i>FRT42 lig<sup>1</sup></i> (O) <i>y w eyFLP</i>, <i>Act>CD2>Gal4</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>FRT42 P{SUPor-P}VhaAC45<sup>KG02272</sup></i> (cl)/<i>FRT42</i> (P) <i>y w eyFLP</i>, <i>Act>CD2>Gal4</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>FRT42 P{SUPor-P}VhaAC45<sup>KG02272</sup></i> (cl)/<i>FRT42 lig<sup>1</sup></i> (Q) <i>y w eyFLP</i>, <i>Act>CD2>Gal4</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>FRT42 P{SUPor-P}VhaAC45<sup>KG02272</sup></i> (cl)/+; <i>EP-DIAP1</i>/+ (R) <i>y w eyFLP</i>, <i>Act>CD2>Gal4</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>FRT42 P{SUPor-P}VhaAC45<sup>KG02272</sup></i> (cl)/<i>FRT42 lig<sup>1</sup></i>; <i>EP-DIAP1</i>/+ (T) <i>y w eyFLP</i>, <i>Act>CD2>Gal4</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>FRT42 P{SUPor-P}VhaAC45<sup>KG02272</sup></i> (cl)/+; UAS-p35/+ (U) <i>y w eyFLP</i>, <i>Act>CD2>Gal4</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>FRT42 P{SUPor-P}VhaAC45<sup>KG02272</sup></i> (cl)/<i>FRT42 lig<sup>1</sup></i>; <i>UAS-p35</i>/+ (V) <i>y w</i>; <i>nub-Gal4</i>/+; <i>UAS-CG1315<sup>RNAi</sup></i> (control)/+ (W) <i>y w</i>; <i>nub-Gal4</i>/+; <i>UAS-lig<sup>RNAi I</sup></i> [86Fb]/+ (X) <i>y w</i>; <i>nub-Gal4</i>/+; <i>UAS-lig<sup>RNAi II</sup></i> [86Fb]/+.</p

    Lig co-localizes with Rin, FMR1, Capr and P-body components in cultured <i>Drosophila</i> S2 cells.

    No full text
    <p>(A–D''') S2 cells co-transfected with <i>GFP-lig</i> (A', A''') and <i>RFP-FMR1</i> (A'', A'''), <i>GFP-lig</i> (B', B''') and <i>RFP-rin</i> (B'', B'''), <i>GFP-lig</i> (C', C''') and <i>RFP-Capr</i> (C'', C''') and <i>GFP-lig</i> (D, D'''), <i>RFP-FMR1</i> (D', D''') and <i>FLAG-rin</i> (D'', D'''). Cells were stained with DAPI to visualize DNA (blue) and for the FLAG-tag to visualize FLAG-Rin (D'', D'''). Scale bars represent 25 µm. (E–F''') Lig co-localizes with P-body markers in S2 cells transfected with <i>GFP-DCP1</i> (E', E''') and <i>RFP-lig</i> (E'', E'''), and <i>GFP-lig</i> (F', F'''). Cells were stained with DAPI (blue) to visualize DNA and with anti-Ago1 antibody (F'', F'''). Note that endogenous Ago1 is accumulating in GFP-Lig foci. Scale bars represent 25 µm.</p

    Rin cooperates with FMR1 to suppress growth.

    No full text
    <p>(A–C) Scanning electron micrographs of adult control (A), <i>FMR1<sup>D113M</sup></i> (B) and <i>rin<sup>2</sup></i> (C) mutant eyes generated by eyFLP/FRT-mediated mitotic recombination. Scale bar represents 100 µm. (D) Statistical analyses as described in <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003598#pgen-1003598-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1D</a>: control (724±13 and 766±18*), <i>FMR1<sup>D113M</sup></i> (728±19; p = 0.68 and 772±17; p = 0.56) and <i>rin<sup>2</sup></i> (761±13; p = 1.85E-04 and 801±17; p = 2.16E-03). (E–F) <i>FMR1<sup>D113M</sup> rin<sup>2</sup></i> homozygous animals die in the early pupal stage forming long, slender pupae (F) in comparison to the control (E). Scale bar represents 500 µm. (G–J) Scanning electron micrographs of adult eyes from control (G), <i>FMR1<sup>D113M</sup> rin<sup>2</sup></i> (H), <i>P{Fmr1.14}</i>; <i>FMR1<sup>D113M</sup> rin<sup>2</sup></i> (I) and <i>Grin<sup>Cherry</sup></i>; <i>FMR1<sup>D113M</sup> rin<sup>2</sup></i> (J) mutant eyes generated by eyFLP/FRT-mediated mitotic recombination. Scale bar represents 100 µm. (K) Statistical analyses as described in <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003598#pgen-1003598-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1D</a>: control (746±28 and 766±18*), <i>FMR1<sup>D113M</sup> rin<sup>2</sup></i> (822±31; p = 4.58E-04 and 815±34; p = 2.79E-03), <i>P{Fmr1.14}</i>; <i>FMR1<sup>D113M</sup> rin<sup>2</sup></i> (760±20; p = 1.17E-03 and 787±16; p = 4.45E-02) and <i>Grin<sup>Cherry</sup></i>; <i>FMR1<sup>D113M</sup> rin<sup>2</sup></i> (760±35; p = 4.94E-03 and 785±33; p = 7.87E-02). * identical control in the second experiment of (D) and (K). (L–O) Scanning electron micrographs of adult control and <i>FMR1<sup>D113M</sup> rin<sup>2</sup></i> eyes generated by eyFLP/FRT-mediated mitotic recombination from flies grown on 25% (L–M) or 400% (N–O') yeast-containing food. Scale bar represents 100 µm. (P) Statistical analyses as described in <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003598#pgen-1003598-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1D</a>: control (744±37 and 755±34) and <i>FMR1<sup>D113M</sup> rin<sup>2</sup></i> (817±31; p = 3.35E-04 and 828±24; p = 1.07E-04) mutant eyes at 25% yeast-containing food and the control (766±29 and 771±15) and <i>FMR1<sup>D113M</sup> rin<sup>2</sup></i> (806±41; p = 0.028 and 773±37; p = 0.88) mutant eyes at 400% yeast-containing food. (Q–R) Scanning electron micrographs of adult <i>p35</i> overexpressing (Q) and <i>FMR1<sup>D113M</sup> rin<sup>2</sup></i> mutant <i>p35</i> overexpressing eyes (R) generated by eyFLP, Actin-Flp out-Gal4/FRT-mediated mitotic recombination (Q–R). Scale bar represents 100 µm. (S) The <i>rin</i> locus (drawn to scale) spans 8.2 kbp and consists of three protein-coding exons (red filled boxes). The allele <i>rin<sup>2</sup></i> represents a 13 kbp deficiency uncovering <i>rin</i>, <i>Rbp4</i> and <i>Hrb87F</i>. The two P-elements <i>P{GawB}rin<sup>NP3248</sup></i> and <i>P{GawB}rin<sup>NP5420</sup></i> are inserted in the 5′ UTR of <i>rin</i>. The genomic rescue construct <i>Grin<sup>Cherry</sup></i> includes 10.3 kbp. Genotypes: (A, G, L and N) <i>y w eyFLP</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>FRT82 cl w<sup>+</sup></i>/<i>FRT82</i> (B) <i>y w eyFLP</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>FRT82 cl w<sup>+</sup></i>/<i>FRT82 FMR1<sup>D113M</sup></i> (C) <i>y w eyFLP</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>FRT82 cl w<sup>+</sup></i>/<i>FRT82 rin<sup>2</sup></i> (H, M, O and O') <i>y w eyFLP</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>FRT82 cl w<sup>+</sup></i>/<i>FRT82 FMR1<sup>D113M</sup> rin<sup>2</sup></i> (I) y w <i>eyFLP</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>P{Fmr1.14}</i> [44E3]/+; <i>FRT82 cl w<sup>+</sup></i>/<i>FRT82 FMR1<sup>D113M</sup> rin<sup>2</sup></i> (J) <i>y w eyFLP</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>Grin<sup>Cherry</sup></i> [44F]/+; <i>FRT82 cl w<sup>+</sup></i>/<i>FRT82 FMR1<sup>D113M</sup> rin<sup>2</sup></i> (Q) <i>y w eyFLP</i>, <i>Act>CD2>Gal4</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>UAS-p35</i>/+; <i>FRT82 cl w<sup>+</sup></i>/+ (R) <i>y w eyFLP</i>, <i>Act>CD2>Gal4</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>UAS-p35</i>/+; <i>FRT82 cl w<sup>+</sup></i>/<i>FRT82 FMR1<sup>D113M</sup> rin<sup>2</sup></i>.</p

    Eyes overexpressing <i>lig</i> are reduced in size and are partially rescued by <i>CycE</i> and <i>DIAP1</i> co-overexpression.

    No full text
    <p>(A–I) Scanning electron micrographs of eyes overexpressing the indicated UAS transgenes under the control of <i>ey-Gal4</i> during development from flies reared on 25% (A–C), 100% (D–F) and 400% (G–I) yeast-containing food, respectively. Scale bar represents 100 µm. (J) Statistical analyses as described in <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003598#pgen-1003598-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1D</a>: <i>ey>GFP</i> (741±30 and 753±12), <i>ey>lig</i> (628±31; p = 1.66E-05 and 608±14; p = 1.17E-10) and <i>ey>lig<sup>R185C/UTR</sup></i> (448±80; p = 4.35E-06 and 435±54; p = 8.12E-09) eyes at 25% yeast-containing food, <i>ey>GFP</i> (768±14 and 768±12), <i>ey>lig</i> (666±30; p = 3.03E-05 and 626±39; p = 3.09E-05) and <i>ey>lig<sup>R185C/UTR</sup></i> (287±42; p = 9.50E-09 and 306±62; p = 5.38E-07) eyes at 100% yeast-containing food and <i>ey>GFP</i> (748±34 and 785±21), <i>ey>lig</i> (588±35; p = 1.55E-06 and 619±53; p = 6.71E-05) and <i>ey>lig<sup>R185C/UTR</sup></i> (193±50; p = 1.18E-10 and 253±36; p = 2.84E-11) eyes at 400% yeast-containing food. (K–L) <i>lig</i> overexpressing clones (induced with the Actin-Flp out-Gal4 system and marked by GFP) in wing imaginal discs of third instar larvae undergo apoptosis as judged by Cleaved Caspase-3 staining (red) (L–L') in comparison to the control (K–K'). Scale bar represents 50 µm. (M–R) The reduced size of eyes overexpressing <i>lig<sup>R185C/UTR</sup></i> induced by <i>ey-Gal4</i> (N) is partially rescued by co-overexpression of <i>DIAP1</i>, an inhibitor of apoptosis (P), or <i>CycE</i> (R). Overexpression of <i>DIAP1</i> (O) or <i>CycE</i> (Q) has no effect on eye size in comparison to the control (M). Scale bar represents 100 µm. (S) Statistical analyses as described in <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003598#pgen-1003598-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1D</a>: <i>ey>GFP</i> (770±15 and 746±14), <i>ey>lig<sup>R185C/UTR</sup></i> (309±34 and 135±73), <i>ey>GFP</i>, <i>DIAP1</i> (789±17 and 790±16), <i>ey>lig<sup>R185C/UTR</sup></i>, <i>DIAP1</i> (477±47; p = 9.60E-06 and 410±51; p = 7.97E-06), <i>ey>GFP</i>, <i>CycE</i> (753±33 and 708±42), and <i>ey>lig<sup>R185C/UTR</sup></i>, <i>CycE</i> (446±38; p = 1.47E-05 and 488±46; p = 1.01E-07) eyes. (T–U) The rescue of the reduced size of eyes overexpressing <i>lig<sup>R185C/UTR</sup></i> induced by <i>ey-Gal4</i> is improved by co-overexpression of <i>DIAP1</i> and <i>CycE</i> (U) in comparison to the rescue experiment of co-overexpression of <i>DIAP1</i> or <i>CycE</i>. Co-overexpression of <i>DIAP1</i> and <i>CycE</i> has no effect on eye size in a wild-type background (T). Scale bar represents 100 µm. (V) Statistical analyses as described in <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003598#pgen-1003598-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1D</a>: <i>ey>lig<sup>R185C/UTR</sup></i> (201±83 and 275±35), <i>ey>CycE</i>, <i>DIAP1</i> (744±14 and 712±37), <i>ey>lig<sup>R185C/UTR</sup></i>, <i>CycE</i>, <i>DIAP1</i> (551±23; p = 1.45E-05 and 595±29; p = 5.38E-10) Genotypes: (A, D and G) <i>w</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>ey-Gal4</i>/<i>UAS-GFP</i> (B, E and H) <i>w</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>ey-Gal4</i>/+; <i>UAS-lig</i>/+ (C, F, and I) <i>w</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>ey-Gal4</i>/+; <i>UAS-lig<sup>R185C/UTR</sup></i>/+ (K) <i>y w hsFLP</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>UAS-GFP</i>/+; <i>Act>CD2>Gal4</i>, <i>UAS-GFP</i>/+ (L) <i>y w hsFLP</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>Act>CD2>Gal4</i>, <i>UAS-GFP</i>/<i>UAS-lig</i> [86Fb] (M–R) first experiment: (M) <i>w</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>ey-Gal4</i>/<i>UAS-GFP</i> (N) <i>w</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>ey-Gal4</i>/+; <i>UAS-lig<sup>R185C/UTR</sup></i>/+ (O) <i>w</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>ey-Gal4</i>/<i>UAS-GFP</i>; <i>EP-DIAP1</i>/+ (P) <i>w</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>ey-Gal4</i>/+; <i>UAS-lig<sup>R185C/UTR</sup></i>/<i>EP-DIAP1</i> (Q) <i>w</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>ey-Gal4</i>/<i>UAS-GFP</i>; <i>UAS-CycE</i>/+ (R) <i>w</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>ey-Gal4</i>/+; <i>UAS-lig<sup>R185C/UTR</sup></i>/<i>UAS-CycE</i>; second experiment: (M) <i>w</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>ey-Gal4</i>/<i>UAS-GFP; UAS-lacZ</i> (N) <i>w</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>ey-Gal4</i>/<i>UAS-GFP</i>; <i>UAS-lig<sup>R185C/UTR</sup>/</i>+ (O) <i>w</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>ey-Gal4</i>/<i>UAS-GFP</i>; <i>EP-DIAP1</i>/+ (P) <i>w</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>ey-Gal4</i>/+; <i>UAS-lig<sup>R185C/UTR</sup></i>/<i>EP-DIAP1</i> (Q) <i>w</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>ey-Gal4</i>/<i>UAS-GFP</i>; <i>UAS-CycE</i>/+ (R) <i>w</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>ey-Gal4</i>/+; <i>UAS-lig<sup>R185C/UTR</sup></i>/<i>UAS-CycE</i> (T) <i>w</i>/<i>y w</i>; <i>ey-Gal4</i>/<i>UAS-CycE; EP-DIAP1</i>/+ (U) <i>w</i>/<i>y w</i>; ey-Gal4/<i>UAS-CycE</i>; <i>UAS-lig<sup>R185C/UTR</sup>/EP-DIAP1</i>.</p
    • …
    corecore