21 research outputs found

    Development and validation of the Psychological Adaptation Scale (PAS): Use in six studies of adaptation to a health condition or risk

    Get PDF
    We introduce The Psychological Adaptation Scale (PAS) for assessing adaptation to a chronic condition or risk and present validity data from six studies of genetic conditions

    2013 Review and Update of the Genetic Counseling Practice Based Competencies by a Task Force of the Accreditation Council for Genetic Counseling

    Full text link
    The first practice based competencies (PBCs) for the field of genetic counseling were adopted by the American Board of Genetic Counseling (ABGC), 1996. Since that time, there has been significant growth in established and new work settings (clinical and non‐clinical) and changes in service delivery models and the roles of genetic counselors. These changes prompted the ABGC to appoint a PBC Task Force in 2011 to review the PBCs with respect to their current relevance and to revise and update them as necessary. There are four domains in the revised PBCs: (I) Genetics Expertise and Analysis (II) Interpersonal, Psychosocial and Counseling Skills (III) Education and (IV) Professional Development and Practice. There are 22 competencies, each clarified with learning objectives or samples of activities and skills; a glossary is included. New competencies were added that address genomics, genetic testing and genetic counselors’ roles in risk assessment, education, supervision, conducting research and presenting research options to patients. With PBCs serving as the pre‐defined abilities or outcomes of training, graduating genetic counselors will be well prepared to enter the field with a minimum level of skills and abilities. A description of the Task Force’s work, key changes and the 2013 PBCs are presented herein.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/147172/1/jgc40868.pd

    Assessing oral literacy demand in genetic counseling dialogue: Preliminary test of a conceptual framework

    No full text
    Health literacy deficits affect half the American patient population and are linked to poor health, ineffective disease management and high rates of hospitalization. Restricted literacy has also been linked with less satisfying medical visits and communication difficulties, particularly in terms of the interpersonal and informational aspects of care. Despite growing attention to these issues by researchers and policy makers, few studies have attempted to conceptualize and assess those aspects of dialogue that challenge persons with low literacy skills, i.e., the oral literacy demand within medical encounters. The current study uses videotapes and transcripts of 152 prenatal and cancer pretest genetic counseling sessions recorded with simulated clients to develop a conceptual framework to explore oral literacy demand and its consequences for medical interaction and related outcomes. Ninety-six prenatal and 81 cancer genetic counselors--broadly representative of the US National Society of Genetic Counselors--participated in the study. Key elements of the conceptual framework used to define oral literacy demand include: (1) use of unfamiliar technical terms; (2) general language complexity, reflected in the application of Microsoft Word grammar summary statistics to session transcripts; and, (3) structural characteristics of dialogue, including pacing, density, and interactivity. Genetic counselor outcomes include self-ratings of session satisfaction, informativeness, and development of rapport. The simulated clients rated their satisfaction with session communication, the counselor's effective use of nonverbal skills, and the counselor's affective demeanor during the session. Sessions with greater overall technical term use were longer and used more complex language reflected in readability indices and multi-syllabic vocabulary (measures averaging pHealth literacy Oral literacy Patient-provider Communication Genetic counseling USA

    In this Issue

    No full text

    Talking about depression : an analogue study of physician gender and communication style on patient disclosures

    No full text
    Objectives To disentangle the effects of physician gender and patient-centered communication style on patients’ oral engagement in depression care. Methods Physician gender, physician race and communication style (high patient-centered (HPC) and low patient-centered (LPC)) were manipulated and presented as videotaped actors within a computer simulated medical visit to assess effects on analogue patient (AP) verbal responsiveness and care ratings. 307 APs (56% female; 70% African American) were randomly assigned to conditions and instructed to verbally respond to depression-related questions and indicate willingness to continue care. Disclosures were coded using Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS). Results Both male and female APs talked more overall and conveyed more psychosocial and emotional talk to HPC gender discordant doctors (all p < .05). APs were more willing to continue treatment with gender-discordant HPC physicians (p < .05). No effects were evident in the LPC condition. Conclusions Findings highlight a role for physician gender when considering active patient engagement in patient-centered depression care. This pattern suggests that there may be largely under-appreciated and consequential effects associated with patient expectations in regard to physician gender that these differ by patient gender. Practice implications High patient-centeredness increases active patient engagement in depression care especially in gender discordant dyads

    Empowering Women\u27s Prenatal Communication: Does Literacy Matter?

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: The study was designed to evaluate the impact of an interactive computer program developed to empower prenatal communication of women with restricted literacy skills. STUDY DESIGN: 83 women seeing 17 clinicians were randomized to a computer-based communication activation intervention, Healthy Babies Healthy Moms (HBHM), or prenatal education, Baby Basics (BB), prior to their prenatal visit. Visit communication was coded with the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) and post-visit satisfaction was reported. RESULTS: Participants were on average 24 years of age and 25 weeks pregnant; 80% were African American. Two-thirds scored ≤ 8(th) grade on a literacy screener. Women with literacy deficits were more verbally active, disclosed more medical and psychosocial/lifestyle information and were rated as more dominant by coders in the HBHM group relative to counterparts in the BB group (all p<.05). Clinicians were less verbally dominant and more patient-centered with literate HBHM relative to BB group women (p<.05); there was a similar, non-significant trend (p<.1) for lower literate women. Clinicians communicated less medical information and made fewer reassurance statements to lower literate women in the HBHM relative to the BB group (p<.05). There was a trend toward lower visit satisfaction for women with restricted literacy in HBHM relative to BB group (p<.1); no difference in satisfaction was evident for more literate women. CONCLUSIONS: The HBHM intervention empowered communication of all women and facilitated verbal engagement and relevant disclosure of medical and psychosocial information of women with literacy deficits. Satisfaction, however, tended to be lower for these women
    corecore