Impact of family medicine clerkships in undergraduate medical education : a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: Synthesise evidence about the impact of family medicine/general practice (FM) clerkships on undergraduate medical students, teaching general/family practitioners (FPs) and/or their patients. DATA SOURCES: Medline, ERIC, PsycINFO, EMBASE and Web of Knowledge searched from 21 November to 17 December 2013. Primary, empirical, quantitative or qualitative studies, since 1990, with abstracts included. No country restrictions. Full text languages: English, French, Spanish, German, Dutch or Italian. REVIEW METHODS: Independent selection and data extraction by two authors using predefined data extraction fields, including Kirkpatrick’s levels for educational intervention outcomes, study quality indicators and Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) strength of findings’ grades. Descriptive narrative synthesis applied. RESULTS: Sixty-four included articles: impact on students (48), teaching FPs (12) and patients (8). Sample sizes: 16-1095 students, 3-146 FPs and 94-2550 patients. Twenty-six studies evaluated at Kirkpatrick level 1, 26 at level 2 and 6 at level 3. Only one study achieved BEME’s grade 5. The majority was assessed as grade 4 (27) and 3 (33). Students reported satisfaction with content and process of teaching as well as learning in FM clerkships. They enhanced previous learning, and provided unique learning on dealing with common acute and chronic conditions, health maintenance, disease prevention, communication and problem-solving skills. Students’ attitudes towards FM were improved, but new or enhanced interest in FM careers did not persist without change after graduation. Teaching FPs reported increased job satisfaction and stimulation for professional development, but also increased workload and less productivity, depending on the setting. Overall, student’s presence and participation did not have a negative impact on patients. CONCLUSIONS: Research quality on the impact of FM clerkships is still limited, yet across different settings and countries, positive impact is reported on students, FPs and patients. Future studies should involve different stakeholders, medical schools and countries, and use standardised and validated evaluation tools

Predictors of poor-quality spirometry in two cohorts of older adults in Russia and Belgium: a cross-sectional study.

Spirometry is an important test for the diagnosis of respiratory diseases, yet it is underused especially in older adults. Several predictors of good-quality spirometry in this age group have been reported, based mainly on in/outpatients of geriatric and/or respiratory units

Predictors of poor-quality spirometry in two cohorts of older adults in Russia and Belgium: a cross-sectional study

Spirometry is an important test for the diagnosis of respiratory diseases, yet it is underused especially in older adults. Several predictors of good-quality spirometry in this age group have been reported, based mainly on in/outpatients of geriatric and/or respiratory units.status: publishe

Airflow limitation by the Global Lungs Initiative equations in a cohort of very old adults

The cut-off for forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) defining airflow limitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is still contested. We assessed airflow limitation prevalence by the lower limit of normal (LLN) of Global Lungs Initiative (GLI) 2012 reference values and its predictive ability for all-cause mortality and hospitalisation in very old adults (aged ≥80 years) compared with the fixed cut-off. In a Belgian population-based prospective cohort of 411 very old adults, airflow limitation prevalence by the 5th percentile of GLI 2012 z-scores (GLI-LLN) and fixed cut-off (0.70) were compared with COPD reported by general practitioners (GPs). Survival and Cox regression multivariable analysis assessed the association of airflow limitation by both cut-offs with 5-year all-cause mortality and first hospitalisation at 3 years. 9.2% had airflow limitation by GLI-LLN and 27% by fixed cut-off, without good agreement (kappa coefficient ≤0.40) with GP-reported COPD (9%). Only airflow limitation by GLI-LLN was independently associated with mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 2.10, 95% CI 1.30-3.38). FEV1/FVC <0.70 but ≥GLI-LLN (17.8%) had no significantly higher risk for mortality or hospitalisation. In a cohort of very old adults, airflow limitation by GLI-LLN has lower prevalence than by fixed cut-off, independently predicts all-cause mortality and does not miss individuals with significantly higher all-cause mortality and hospitalisation.Query date: 2019-12-23 16:38:43status: publishe

Short-term prognostic value of forced expiratory volume in 1 second divided by height cubed in a prospective cohort of people 80 years and older.

Spirometry-based parameters of pulmonary function such as forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) have prognostic value beyond respiratory morbidity and mortality. FEV1 divided by height cubed (FEV1/Ht(3)) has been found to be better at predicting all-cause mortality than the usual standardization as percentage of predicted "normal values" (FEV1%) and its use is independent of reference equations. Yet, limited data are available on the very old adults (80 years and older) and in association to other adverse health outcomes relevant for this age group. This study aims to investigate the short-term prognostic value of FEV1/Ht(3) for all-cause mortality, hospitalization, physical and mental decline in a cohort of very old adults

Airflow limitation by the Global Lungs Initiative equations in a cohort of very old adults.

The cut-off for forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) defining airflow limitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is still contested. We assessed airflow limitation prevalence by the lower limit of normal (LLN) of Global Lungs Initiative (GLI) 2012 reference values and its predictive ability for all-cause mortality and hospitalisation in very old adults (aged ≥80 years) compared with the fixed cut-off. In a Belgian population-based prospective cohort of 411 very old adults, airflow limitation prevalence by the 5th percentile of GLI 2012 z-scores (GLI-LLN) and fixed cut-off (0.70) were compared with COPD reported by general practitioners (GPs). Survival and Cox regression multivariable analysis assessed the association of airflow limitation by both cut-offs with 5-year all-cause mortality and first hospitalisation at 3 years. 9.2% had airflow limitation by GLI-LLN and 27% by fixed cut-off, without good agreement (kappa coefficient ⩽0.40) with GP-reported COPD (9%). Only airflow limitation by GLI-LLN was independently associated with mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 2.10, 95% CI 1.30-3.38). FEV1/FVC <0.70 but ≥GLI-LLN (17.8%) had no significantly higher risk for mortality or hospitalisation. In a cohort of very old adults, airflow limitation by GLI-LLN has lower prevalence than by fixed cut-off, independently predicts all-cause mortality and does not miss individuals with significantly higher all-cause mortality and hospitalisation