Recruitment to clinical trials : a meta-ethnographic synthesis of studies of reasons for participation

Peer reviewedPostprin

Why Health and Social Care Support for People with Long-Term Conditions Should be Oriented Towards Enabling Them to Live Well

This research was funded by The Health Foundation (a charity working to improve the quality of healthcare in the UK) via (a) a commission on conceptualising collaborative care, (b) an Open Insight initiative project on re-conceptualising support for self-management (reference 7209), and (c) a contribution towards salary funding for Alan Cribb. At the University of Aberdeen, Vikki Entwistle works within the Health Services Research Unit, which is core funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government’s Health and Social Care Directorates. Health Foundation and Scottish Government staff are among those who have participated in knowledge exchange events related to the two projects. The views expressed in the paper are those of the authors and are not necessarily shared by funders or workshop participants. The authors accept full responsibility for this paper. Open access via Springer Compact AgreementPeer reviewedPublisher PD

Regulatory withdrawal of medicines marketed with uncertain benefits : the bevacizumab case study

Acknowledgements Professor Elizabeth Roughead is funded by a Future Fellowship from the Australian Research Council. The views expressed are those of the authors, the sponsor had no role in the preparation of the manuscript.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Varieties of improvement expertise : Knowledge and contestation in health-care improvement

Funding information Wellcome Trust, Grant/Award Number: 209811/Z/17/Z ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was funded in whole, or in part, by the Wellcome Trust (Grant number 209811/Z/17/Z). For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission. In addition we would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their very helpful suggestions.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Defining What is Good : Pluralism and Healthcare Quality

This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust (209811). There is no supporting data relating to this work. We are very grateful to two anonymous reviewers, whose thoughtful and constructive comments pressed us to clarify and develop aspects of our argument.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Tackling disrespect in healthcare : the relevance of socio-relational equality

Acknowledgements: We thank two anonymous reviewers for the Journal of Health Services Research and Policy for helpful comments on an earlier draft. Funding: This research was funded in whole, or in part, by the Wellcome Trust, grant number [209811/Z/17/Z]. For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.Peer reviewedPostprin

Recruitment to trials : insights from a meta-ethnography of qualitative studies

Peer reviewedPublisher PD

What does 'quality' add? Towards an ethics of healthcare improvement.

Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Values and Ethics

Acknowledgements We thank the peer reviewers for their insightful comments and recommendations to improve the Element. A list of peer reviewers is published at www.cambridge .org/IQ-peer-reviewers

Talking it better : Conversations and normative complexity in healthcare improvement

Funding This study was funded by Wellcome Trust (grant number 209811/Z/17/Z)Peer reviewedPublisher PD