403 research outputs found
Implementing Lisbon: A Critical Appraisal of the Citizens' Initiative
In a much-heralded effort to bring people across Europe closer to the EU and enhance the Union's democratic legitimacy, the Lisbon Treaty has introduced the Citizens' Initiative (CI) -- an idea born in the final phase of the Constitutional Convention
COVID-19: Lessons from the ‘euro crisis’. EPC Discussion Paper 16 April 2020
The coronavirus is an unprecedented external shock that
is challenging the EU and its member states. The crisis is
fundamental, posing a dramatic threat to public health and
the life of citizens. Everyone is affected by the imposition
of restrictive measures aiming to contain the spread of
the virus. Efforts to flatten the curve have severely hit our
economies and will require unparalleled monetary and
fiscal measures by central banks and governments
Time to move up a gear: the results of an insufficient summit | Post-Summit Analysis. EPC Post-Summit Analysis 2 July 2018
Despite all the public attention it received, the 28-29 June EU Summit will not make it into history books. There had been hopes that this European Council would be an important milestone on the path to elaborating a 'win-win package deal' reflecting the distinct interests and concerns of all member states – but it was not. It made progress, but it failed to live up to expectations, even though major issues for the future of Europe were up for discussion: migration, Economic and Monetary Union reform, security and defence.
EU leaders once again postponed many critical decisions until the end of 2018, and there are serious doubts that they will be able to reach worthwhile compromises ahead of the May 2019 European elections. The window of opportunity is closing quickly, and a significant number of governments do not seem eager to seek solutions. Even among those that aspire to make progress in the coming months, there are question marks over whether they will have the political capital, will, courage and clout to do so
The beginning of a new political cycle: the results and consequences of a nomination summit. EPC Post-Summit Analysis, 30 June 2014
Despite a broader agenda, the June 2014 European Council was dominated by the decision of EU leaders – taken by qualified majority – to propose to the European Parliament Jean-Claude Juncker as the next Commission President. In this post-summit analysis Janis A. Emmanouilidis argues that recent developments could have four consequences: increasing politicisation at European level; opposition from the side of national governments to what they consider to be an unjustifiable shift of power; further complication, maybe even deterioration of the relationship between London and ‘Brussels; and ‘consolidation’ as the predominant political attitude in the beginning of a new political cycle. Aside from all this, the Summit adopted a Strategic Agenda for the years to come, agreed to new strategic guidelines for the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, postponed the decision on a new energy and climate framework to October, concluded the fourth European Semester with the adoption of country-specific recommendations, and, last but not least, EU leaders finally signed the Association Agreements with Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine demonstrating that the Union and these countries are ready to deepen political and economic ties
Europe in limbo while the UK descends into chaos. EPC Post-Summit Commentary, 30 June 2016
The EU Summit and the separate meeting of the EU27 without the UK on 28/29 June 2016 demonstrated that the EU is in limbo. Following the initial shock, frustration and anger after the unexpected result of the UK ‘in/out’ referendum, the future relationship between the European Union (EU) and the United Kingdom (UK) monopolised the meetings of EU leaders. The EU has entered uncharted waters and leaders are struggling to figure out how exactly to deal with the manifold (potential) consequences of the ‘Brexit crisis’. Despite the many uncertainties, the EU27 managed to reach some common lines, trying to convey four key messages, although the final outcome of the crisis and its effects on the Union’s overall future are still very unclear
Low key but not low impact: the results of the EU's 'transition' summit. EPC Post-Summit Analysis, 27 October 2014
The European Council Summit of 23-24 October 2014 may have been relatively low key, but many important decisions were made which could encourage historical changes. In this post-summit analysis, Janis A. Emmanouilidis examines the agreement reached on a new climate and energy policy framework for 2020-2030 which despite falling short of the European Commission’s original proposals, it nevertheless delivers a positive message to international community ahead of the global climate negotiations next year. He also highlights the significance of the request from euro-zone leaders for a new report on ‘better economic governance’ by December. More broadly, he uses this moment of transition in the EU’s leadership to analyse the current state and future direction of the Union, and underlines the need to provide a coherent and holistic response to the damage caused by the crisis and the challenges facing the Union, on the basis of an ambitious but pragmatic ‘package deal’ – a new pact between EU governments, and between the Union and its citizens – to heal the divisions of recent years and restore public faith in the benefits of EU membership
Elements of a complex but still incomplete puzzle: an assessment of the EU(-Turkey) summit. CEPS Post-Summit Analysis, 21 March 2016
The March 2016 EU Summit was yet another attempt to make progress on managing the EU’s migration/refugee crisis. In this post-summit analysis, Janis A. Emmanouilidis argues that the EU-Turkey deal, which foresees a return of migrants from Greece to Turkey and a direct resettlement of Syrians from Turkey to the EU on the grounds of a ‘1-for-1’ scheme, is a key and necessary element in a very complex puzzle trying to stop ‘irregular routes’ of migration. The ultimate success of this agreement is by no means certain, but it has the chance to reduce the number of people arriving at the shores of Europe. However, this would neither settle the crisis nor will it provide an adequate response to those in need of international protection. The ‘humanitarian imperative’ requires that the EU-Turkey deal is complemented by a much more ambitious direct resettlement scheme and other long-term measures as part of a comprehensive plan aiming to balance ‘solidarity and security’ in an effort to sustainably overcome the crisis
Europe’s reactive and protective muddling through: the results of a summit in fire fighting mode. EPC Post-Summit Analysis, 19 October 2015
The EU’s October summit was dominated by one issue; the migration and refugee crisis, with EU
leaders intent on putting on a public display of unity after weeks of bitter arguments, and concentrating
on fire-fighting and immediate measures to tackle the most pressing reasons for, and impacts of, the
crisis. Longer-term measures to address some of the root causes of increased migratory flows, support
for the integration of newly arrived refugees or the introduction of new channels of legal migration,
were not discussed. The Summit also spent little time on two issues that had originally been expected
to be a key part of the agenda: the forthcoming British referendum on EU membership, where irritation
with the slow pace of talks and British vagueness about its demands were in evidence; and the
governance of Economic and Monetary Union (EMU), where EU leaders missed another opportunity
for a thorough debate about future perspectives on the basis of the ‘Five Presidents’ Report’
New Pact for Europe: Towards a New Pact for Europe. Second report, October 2014
As the new EU leadership takes office, Europe faces a complex web of economic, political, social and global challenges
which require new responses – above all, the need to restore the public’s faith and trust after the years of
crisis which have prompted growing dissatisfaction with the Union, with many people now seeing it as part of the
problem rather than part of the solution to those challenges.
In 2012, a consortium of 11 European foundations initiated by the King Baudouin Foundation and Bertelsmann
Stiftung, and supported by the European Policy Centre, decided to launch a project to promote a Europe-wide debate
on the future of EU integration: an ambitious participatory initiative whose ultimate goal is to develop realistic
reform proposals to shore up a Union hit by multiple storms in recent years, which have left many people questioning
its capacity to respond effectively to those challenges.
Two years later, we are proud to be able to present the outcome of this endeavour: the result of a joint reflection
process involving the public, politicians, policy-makers, business leaders, trade unionists, EU experts, opinion-formers
and other civil society representatives in many EU Member States. Obviously, not all the ideas and proposals
generated by this process could be included in this report, but we hope that it faithfully reflects the feedback we
received in all the debates.
The discussions we have had led to the report that you now hold in your hands, which calls for a New Pact for
Europe – between EU Member States and between the EU and its citizens – to enhance the Union’s capacity to
deliver effective solutions to the many challenges facing Europe, and to do so in a way that benefits all EU countries
and groups within society.
This report is designed to feed into the on-going discussions about the EU’s future as the new leadership team
takes charge, providing what we hope will be seen as a valuable contribution to the debate on how to introduce
ambitious while at the same time workable and realistic reforms to make the EU more effective in responding
to the challenges we face. We hope that it will be taken up for discussion by the new European Parliament, the
new leadership of the European Commission, European Council and European External Action Service, and also by
policy-makers in the Member States. And it does not by any means mark the end of the process. The report will be
discussed again with policy-makers and stakeholders in a majority of Member States. Their feedback is important to
us and will impact the future progress of the initiative
- …