4 research outputs found

    Summarizing activity limitations in children with chronic illnesses living in the community: a measurement study of scales using supplemented interRAI items

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To test the validity and reliability of scales intended to measure activity limitations faced by children with chronic illnesses living in the community. The scales were based on information provided by caregivers to service program personnel almost exclusively trained as social workers. The items used to measure activity limitations were interRAI items supplemented so that they were more applicable to activity limitations in children with chronic illnesses. In addition, these analyses may shed light on the possibility of gathering functional information that can span the life course as well as spanning different care settings.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Analyses included testing the internal consistency, predictive, concurrent, discriminant and construct validity of two activity limitation scales. The scales were developed using assessment data gathered in the United States of America (USA) from over 2,700 assessments of children aged 4 to 20 receiving Medicaid Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic and Treatment (EPSDT) services, specifically Personal Care Services to assist children in overcoming activity limitations. The Medicaid program in the USA pays for health care services provided to children in low-income households. Data were collected in a single, large state in the southwestern USA in late 2008 and early 2009. A similar sample of children was assessed in 2010, and the analyses were replicated using this sample.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The two scales exhibited excellent internal consistency. Evidence on the concurrent, predictive, discriminant, and construct validity of the proposed scales was strong. Quite importantly, scale scores were not correlated with (confounded with) a child's developmental stage or age. The results for these scales and items were consistent across the two independent samples.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Unpaid caregivers, usually parents, can provide assessors lacking either medical or nursing training with reliable and valid information on the activity limitations of children. One can summarize these data in scales that are both internally consistent and valid. Researchers and clinicians can use supplemented interRAI items to provide guidance for professionals and programs serving children, as well as older persons. This research emphasizes the importance of developing medical information systems that allow one to integrate information not only across care settings but also across an individual's life course.</p

    Severity of Children&apos;s Intellectual Disabilities and Medicaid Personal Care Services

    No full text
    Objectives: This research investigated the relationship between a child&apos;s reported intellectual disability (ID) level and caregivers&apos; reports of the child&apos;s health status to predict Medicaid Personal Care Services (PCS) hours authorized for that child. We also investigated how activity limitations in the home varied with the level of ID. Design: The sample included 1,108 community-residing children with a reported level of ID in the Texas Medicaid system and who were assessed for the PCS program. All data were collected with the Personal Care Assessment Form (PCAF), an instrument developed by the authors for evaluating children&apos;s PCS needs. Case managers completed the PCAF in the child&apos;s home with the child and primary caregivers present. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test a model reflecting the role of ID and other characteristics of the child in determining the number of PCS hours authorized. Additional analyses revealed the degree to which variation among the case managers affected the number of hours authorized. Results: ID level and other individual characteristics had a significant effect on reports of a child&apos;s activity limitations (R 2 Ď­ .67), which in turn affected the hours of PCS authorized (R 2 Ď­ .27). We found no significant direct relationship between ID level and PCS hours: ID level had an indirect relationship on PCS hours through activity limitations. When the variance in hours authorized was decomposed, individual characteristics accounted for 20% of the variance and case managers accounted for 14%. Conclusions: Assessments of caregiver and child strengths and limitations in the home are critical in the allocation of Medicaid home-based services, above and beyond the information conveyed by demographic and diagnostic data. Implications for home-based assessments of functional limitations and needs for family caregivers and their children with ID are discussed
    corecore