9 research outputs found
1277-P: Diabetes Management Supplies in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: Don’t Leave Home Without Them!
Youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) require 24/7 access to T1D management supplies. This study aims to characterize access to T1D supplies when youth are away from home. We emailed a comprehensive survey to 4756 parents of T1D Exchange participants <18 years old; 752 respondents completed the survey (83% completed by parents). Results were age-stratified: <6 (N=21), 6-12 (N=271) and 13-18 (N=459). The majority of youth carry rapid-acting insulin most of the time or always, yet the proportion decreases as age increases (Table 1). ≥80% of injection users carry an extra pen or syringe, while >55% of pump users carry an extra infusion set. Among CGM users, 100% of ≤6 years old vs. 67% of adolescents carry a receiver or phone; 33% of 13-18 years old never carry an extra sensor. 38% of youth ≤6 years old vs. 27% of teens carry blood or urine ketone testing supplies. In total, 64% reported carrying glucose tablets or gel; 87% carry another rapid acting carbohydrate. 64% of respondents carry glucagon, again decreasing across adolescence. Over 2/3 carry at least one form of T1D identification. Technology to optimize glycemic control and detect/prevent acute complications of T1D have improved. Yet, adolescents are less likely than younger T1D-affected youth, to carry supplies to detect, prevent and/or treat acute events. These findings call for novel and ongoing T1D emergency preparedness training to strike a balance between supervision and autonomy of adolescents.
Disclosure
M. Quinn: None. R. Bailey: None. N.C. Foster: None. J. Simmons: None. E. Eyth: None. H. Rodriguez: Research Support; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Daiichi Pharm Corp, MannKind Corporation, Medtronic MiniMed, Inc. Research Support; Spouse/Partner; Medtronic MiniMed, Inc. Research Support; Self; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. Other Relationship; Self; Merck & Co., Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novo Nordisk Inc. S. Corathers: None. C.J. Levy: Advisory Panel; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. Employee; Spouse/Partner; Allergan. N.M. Sheanon: None. R.M. Wasserman: None. D. Sparling: None. D. Adkins: None. A. Albanese-O'Neill: None. D.J. DeSalvo: Consultant; Self; Dexcom, Inc., Insulet Corporation.
Funding
The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
</jats:sec
Recommended from our members
Increased HbA1c Variability May Shorten Time to Microalbuminuria Development in Type 1 Diabetes (T1D)
We aim to understand the impact of HbA1c variability, as measured by SD-HbA1c, on risk of microalbuminuria in T1D population. An analysis was performed utilizing data of 8,680 participants in the T1D Exchange Clinic Registry (50% female, 86% non-Hispanic white, mean age 34 years, mean diabetes duration 14 years at enrollment) who met the following criteria: ≥2 clinic visit records, T1D duration ≥1 year at enrollment, age of diagnosis ≥10 years old and no known renal disease (including no microalbuminuria) at the time of registry enrollment. Median number of albuminuria and HbA1c measures were 4 and 21 per participant, respectively. Microalbuminuria was present during follow-up in 562 (6.5%) participants. Median intrapersonal mean HbA1c and SD-HbA1c were 7.8% and 0.6% respectively. Participants with high HbA1c variability had shorter time to first microalbuminuria (p<0.001, Figure 1a.) Those with high (≥50th percentile) mean HbA1c and high SD-HbA1c also had shorter diabetes duration prior to first reported microalbuminuria compared to high mean-HbA1c but low SD-HbA1c (p<0.001, Figure 1b). HbA1c variability relates to risk of microalbuminuria in T1D; its relationship to other outcomes should be studied.
Disclosure
M.A. Clements: Speaker's Bureau; Self; Medtronic. Advisory Panel; Self; Glooko, Inc.. M. Wu: None. N.C. Foster: None. L.M. Laffel: Consultant; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi US, MannKind Corporation, Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Dexcom, Inc., Insulet Corporation, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Diabetes Institute, LLC.. V.N. Shah: None. F. Vendrame: Consultant; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc.. R.S. Kingman: None. G.T. Alonso: None. A. Carlson: Advisory Panel; Self; Sanofi, Insulet Corporation. Consultant; Self; Merck & Co., Inc.. Research Support; Self; Medtronic, Novo Nordisk A/S. D.J. DeSalvo: Consultant; Self; Dexcom, Inc.. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Insulet Corporation. B.A. Buckingham: Advisory Panel; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc., ConvaTec Inc.. Research Support; Self; Medtronic, Insulet Corporation, Dexcom, Inc., Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.. Consultant; Self; Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc., Becton, Dickinson and Company. J. Sherr: Consultant; Self; Medtronic MiniMed, Inc.. Advisory Panel; Self; Insulet Corporation, Eli Lilly and Company, Bigfoot Biomedical. R. Benjamin: Speaker's Bureau; Self; Pfizer Inc.. E. Eyth: None. S. DuBose: None
REPLACE-BG: A Randomized Trial Comparing Continuous Glucose Monitoring With and Without Routine Blood Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Well-Controlled Type 1 Diabetes
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) without confirmatory blood glucose monitoring (BGM) measurements is as safe and effective as using CGM adjunctive to BGM in adults with well-controlled type 1 diabetes (T1D).
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A randomized noninferiority clinical trial was conducted at 14 sites in the T1D Exchange Clinic Network. Participants were ≥18 years of age (mean 44 ± 14 years), had T1D for ≥1 year (mean duration 24 ± 12 years), used an insulin pump, and had an HbA
RESULTS: CGM use averaged 6.7 ± 0.5 and 6.8 ± 0.4 days/week in the CGM-only and CGM+BGM groups, respectively, over the 26-week trial. BGM tests per day (including the two required daily for CGM calibration) averaged 2.8 ± 0.9 and 5.4 ± 1.4 in the two groups, respectively (
CONCLUSIONS: Use of CGM without regular use of confirmatory BGM is as safe and effective as using CGM with BGM in adults with well-controlled T1D at low risk for severe hypoglycemia
Recommended from our members
REPLACE-BG: A Randomized Trial Comparing Continuous Glucose Monitoring With and Without Routine Blood Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Well-Controlled Type 1 Diabetes.
ObjectiveTo determine whether the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) without confirmatory blood glucose monitoring (BGM) measurements is as safe and effective as using CGM adjunctive to BGM in adults with well-controlled type 1 diabetes (T1D).Research design and methodsA randomized noninferiority clinical trial was conducted at 14 sites in the T1D Exchange Clinic Network. Participants were ≥18 years of age (mean 44 ± 14 years), had T1D for ≥1 year (mean duration 24 ± 12 years), used an insulin pump, and had an HbA1c ≤9.0% (≤75 mmol/mL) (mean 7.0 ± 0.7% [53 ± 7.7 mmol/mol]); prestudy, 47% were CGM users. Participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to the CGM-only (n = 149) or CGM+BGM (n = 77) group. The primary outcome was time in range (70-180 mg/dL) over the 26-week trial, with a prespecified noninferiority limit of 7.5%.ResultsCGM use averaged 6.7 ± 0.5 and 6.8 ± 0.4 days/week in the CGM-only and CGM+BGM groups, respectively, over the 26-week trial. BGM tests per day (including the two required daily for CGM calibration) averaged 2.8 ± 0.9 and 5.4 ± 1.4 in the two groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Mean time in 70-180 mg/dL was 63 ± 13% at both baseline and 26 weeks in the CGM-only group and 65 ± 13% and 65 ± 11% in the CGM+BGM group (adjusted difference 0%; one-sided 95% CI -2%). No severe hypoglycemic events occurred in the CGM-only group, and one occurred in the CGM+BGM group.ConclusionsUse of CGM without regular use of confirmatory BGM is as safe and effective as using CGM with BGM in adults with well-controlled T1D at low risk for severe hypoglycemia
Longitudinal Changes in Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use Among Individuals With Type 1 Diabetes: International Comparison in the German and Austrian DPV and U.S. T1D Exchange Registries
Low-Dose Anti-Thymocyte Globulin Preserves C-Peptide, Reduces HbA1c, and Increases Regulatory to Conventional T-Cell Ratios in New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes: Two-Year Clinical Trial Data
A three-arm, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial performed by the Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Study Group previously demonstrated that low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) (2.5 mg/kg) preserved β-cell function and reduced HbA1c for 1 year in new-onset type 1 diabetes. Subjects (N = 89) were randomized to 1) ATG and pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF), 2) ATG alone, or 3) placebo. Herein, we report 2-year area under the curve (AUC) C-peptide and HbA1c, prespecified secondary end points, and potential immunologic correlates. The 2-year mean mixed-meal tolerance test–stimulated AUC C-peptide, analyzed by ANCOVA adjusting for baseline C-peptide, age, and sex (n = 82) with significance defined as one-sided P &lt; 0.025, was significantly higher in subjects treated with ATG versus placebo (P = 0.00005) but not ATG/GCSF versus placebo (P = 0.032). HbA1c was significantly reduced at 2 years in subjects treated with ATG (P = 0.011) and ATG/GCSF (P = 0.022) versus placebo. Flow cytometry analyses demonstrated reduced circulating CD4:CD8 ratio, increased regulatory T-cell:conventional CD4 T-cell ratios, and increased PD-1+CD4+ T cells following low-dose ATG and ATG/GCSF. Low-dose ATG partially preserved β-cell function and reduced HbA1c 2 years after therapy in new-onset type 1 diabetes. Future studies should determine whether low-dose ATG might prevent or delay the onset of type 1 diabetes.</jats:p
The Contemporary Prevalence of Diabetic Neuropathy in Type 1 Diabetes: Findings From the T1D Exchange
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the contemporary prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in participants with type 1 diabetes in the T1D Exchange Clinic Registry throughout the U.S.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
DPN was assessed with the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Questionnaire (MNSIQ) in adults with ≥5 years of type 1 diabetes duration. A score of ≥4 defined DPN. Associations of demographic, clinical, and laboratory factors with DPN were assessed.
RESULTS
Among 5,936 T1D Exchange participants (mean ± SD age 39 ± 18 years, median type 1 diabetes duration 18 years [interquartile range 11, 31], 55% female, 88% non-Hispanic white, mean glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] 8.1 ± 1.6% [65.3 ± 17.5 mmol/mol]), DPN prevalence was 11%. Compared with those without DPN, DPN participants were older, had higher HbA1c, had longer duration of diabetes, were more likely to be female, and were less likely to have a college education and private insurance (all P &lt; 0.001). DPN participants also were more likely to have cardiovascular disease (CVD) (P &lt; 0.001), worse CVD risk factors of smoking (P = 0.008), hypertriglyceridemia (P = 0.002), higher BMI (P = 0.009), retinopathy (P = 0.004), reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.02), and Charcot neuroarthropathy (P = 0.002). There were no differences in insulin pump or continuous glucose monitor use, although DPN participants were more likely to have had severe hypoglycemia (P = 0.04) and/or diabetic ketoacidosis (P &lt; 0.001) in the past 3 months.
CONCLUSIONS
The prevalence of DPN in this national cohort with type 1 diabetes is lower than in prior published reports but is reflective of current clinical care practices. These data also highlight that nonglycemic risk factors, such as CVD risk factors, severe hypoglycemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, and lower socioeconomic status, may also play a role in DPN development.
</jats:sec
The Effect of Ethnicity in the Rate of Beta-Cell Functional Loss in the First 3 Years After Type 1 Diabetes Diagnosis
Abstract
Objective
We set forth to compare ethnicities for metabolic and immunological characteristics at the clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (T1D) and assess the effect of ethnicity on beta-cell functional loss within 3 years after clinical diagnosis.
Research Methods and Design
We studied participants in TrialNet New Onset Intervention Trials (n = 624, median age = 14.4 years, 58% male, 8.7% Hispanic) and followed them prospectively for 3 years. Mixed meal tolerance tests (MMTT) were performed within 6 months following clinical diagnosis and repeated semiannually. Unless otherwise indicated, analyses were adjusted for age, sex, BMI Z-score, and diabetes duration.
Results
At T1D clinical diagnosis, Hispanics, compared with non-Hispanic whites (NHW), had a higher frequency of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) (44.7% vs 25.3%, OR = 2.36, P = 0.01), lower fasting glucose (97 vs 109 mg/dL, P = 0.02) and higher fasting C-peptide (1.23 vs 0.94 ng/mL, P = 0.02) on the first MMTT, and higher frequency of ZnT8 autoantibody positivity (n = 201, 94.1% vs 64%, OR = 7.98, P = 0.05). After exclusion of participants in experimental arms of positive clinical trials, C-peptide area under the curve (AUC) trajectories during the first 3 years after clinical diagnosis were not significantly different between Hispanics and NHW after adjusting for age, sex, BMI-z score, and DKA (n = 413, P = 0.14).
Conclusion
Despite differences in the metabolic and immunological characteristics at clinical diagnosis of T1D between Hispanics and NHW, C-peptide trajectories did not differ significantly in the first 3 years following clinical diagnosis after adjustment for body mass index and other confounders. These findings may inform the design of observational studies and intervention trials in T1D.
</jats:sec
