13 research outputs found

    Randomized sham controlled trial of cranial microcurrent stimulation for symptoms of depression, anxiety, pain, fatigue and sleep disturbances in women receiving chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer

    Get PDF
    Purpose Women with breast cancer may experience symptoms of depression, anxiety, pain, fatigue and sleep disturbances during chemotherapy. However, there are few modalities that address multiple, commonly occurring symptoms that may occur in individuals receiving cancer treatment. Cranial electrical stimulation (CES) is a treatment that is FDA cleared for depression, anxiety and insomnia. CES is applied via electrodes placed on the ear that deliver pulsed, low amplitude electrical current to the head. Methods This phase III randomized, sham-controlled study aimed to examine the effects of cranial microcurrent stimulation on symptoms of depression, anxiety, pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbances in women receiving chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. Patients were randomly assigned to either an actual or sham device and used the device daily for 1 h. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00902330. Results The sample included N = 167 women with early-stage breast cancer. Symptom severity of depression, anxiety, and fatigue and sleep disturbances were generally mild to moderate. Levels of pain were low. Anxiety was highest prior to the initial chemotherapy and decreased over time. The primary outcome assessment (symptoms of depression, anxiety, fatigue, pain, sleep disturbances) revealed no statistically significant differences between the two groups, actual CES vs. sham. Conclusion In this study, women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer experienced multiple symptoms in the mild to moderate range. Although there is no evidence for the routine use of CES during the chemotherapy period for symptom management in women with breast cancer, further symptom management modalities should be evaluated to mitigate symptoms of depression, anxiety, fatigue, pain and sleep disturbances over the course of chemotherapy

    Elswick, Jr., R.K.

    No full text

    Determination of optimal vibration dose to treat Parkinson's disease gait symptoms: A clinical trial

    No full text
    Introduction: Most people with Parkinson's disease (PD) will experience gait problems. Previous studies demonstrated improved gait and balance after vibration stimulation was applied to the feet of PD patients. However, not all study participants showed improvement, perhaps due to sub-optimal vibration stimulus. Thus far, the optimal frequency and amplitude of vibration for mitigating gait dysfunction in PD have yet to be systematically explored. This study aimed to deliver vibration to the feet of 26 people with PD gait disturbances. We hypothesized that a global frequency, amplitude, and minimum duration of vibration therapy are required to improve PD gait issues. Methods: This was a phase Ib trial to identify optimal vibration parameters. Thirteen participants were recruited at Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) stage II and 13 participants at stage III. Each group was randomly assigned to different frequency and amplitude settings prescribed by the central composite design methodology. Each participant received vibration for 18 min per walking session, for eight sessions spread over one week. Results: Results showed an optimal response to treatment for frequency (Hz) and amplitude (mm) of vibration based on the Functional Ambulation Performance score for stages II and III. In the H&Y stage II group, stabilization of outcomes occurred after the 4th treatment. This stabilization was not seen in stage III participants. Conclusions: A global frequency and vibration amplitude have been identified for treating PD gait disorders. Patients with more advanced disease may require a longer duration of therapy

    Advancing the Biobehavioral Research of Fatigue With Genetics and Genomics

    No full text
    PURPOSE: To examine phenotypic considerations in the study of fatigue and to explore significant issues affecting the extension of biobehavioral research of fatigue by the inclusion of genetic and genomic markers. THEORETICAL ORGANIZATION: Fatigue is a condition that has an adverse effect on quality of life that has been a focus of nursing inquiry. Yet, the study of fatigue has been stymied by the lack of phenotypic clarity. To expand the biobehavioral inquiry of fatigue, phenotypic clarity is needed. In addition, examining genomic factors associated with fatigue may help to elucidate the pathophysiology of fatigue and, in the future, lead to targeted interventions that address the molecular basis of fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Given that nursing has been at the forefront of the study of fatigue, nurse scientists should consider enhancing phenotypic clarity by the development of a case-definition and use of a core measure of fatigue, one that can be augmented by condition- or population-specific measures as needed. Following the establishment of phenotypic clarity, the integration of genomics into biobehavioral research offers an opportunity for further clarity of phenotypes and for theoretical specification of the pathophysiology of conditions such as fatigue. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The development of targeted interventions for fatigue depend on a more precise definition of fatigue and a better understanding of the biologic processes that contribute to its development and persistence
    corecore