4 research outputs found

    Data_Sheet_1_Mediating effect of symptom severity on the relationship between aggression, impulsivity and quality of life outcomes among patients with schizophrenia and related psychoses.pdf

    No full text
    AimsAggression and impulsivity among individuals with schizophrenia have been associated with poor clinical outcomes including worsening of symptoms and substance abuse which have been linked to a lower quality of life (QoL). The current study aimed to look at the mediating effect of symptom severity on the relationship between aggression, impulsivity and QoL among outpatients with schizophrenia and related psychoses in a multi-ethnic Asian population.MethodsData (n = 397) were collected from outpatients seeking treatment at the Institute of Mental Health. The World Health Organization quality of life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) scale, the symptoms checklist-90 revised (SCL-90-R), Buss Perry aggression questionnaire (BPAQ), and the Barratt impulsiveness scales (BIS) were used to assess subjective well-being, symptom severity, aggression, and impulsivity, respectively. Mediation analysis was performed using the PROCESS macro to understand the mediating effect of symptom severity.ResultsMotor impulsivity (MI) was indirectly associated with both the physical and psychological health domains of QoL while self-control was indirectly associated with the physical, psychological, and environmental health QoL domains through increased symptom severity.ConclusionThe significant indirect effect of symptom severity in our study highlights one potential pathway through which impulsivity impacts the QoL of individuals with schizophrenia and related psychoses. Elucidating other factors besides symptom severity that have an indirect effect on the QoL of individuals provides alternative approaches for treatment through which better clinical outcomes can be achieved.</p

    Table_1_Needs of patients with early psychosis: A comparison of patient’s and mental health care provider’s perception.DOCX

    No full text
    BackgroundNeeds define the capacity of a patient to benefit from health care services and a systematic assessment of needs allows planning and delivery of effective treatment to suit patients. This study aimed to understand the (a) needs felt by patients and those perceived by the care providers (CPs), (b) agreement between patients and CPs in the identified needs and (c) factors associated with unmet needs.MethodsParticipants (N = 215) were recruited through convenience sampling from the Early Psychosis Intervention Programme (EPIP). Data was captured from patients and CPs using the Camberwell Assessment of Needs Short Appraisal Schedule (CANSAS).ResultsPatients and CPs identified an average of 4.06 and 3.84 needs, respectively. The highest number of unmet needs were identified for the social (50% of patients and CPs) and health domains (31.13% of patients’ vs. 28.30% of CPs). Company, intimate relationships, psychotic symptoms, money, sexual expression and psychological distress, information and benefits were the unmet needs identified by patients, whereas company, intimate relationships, physical health, and daytime activities were identified by CPs. The concordance between patients and CPs was low with majority of the items scoring slight to fair agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0–0.4). Older age, depression, severe anxiety and having Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) were positively associated with unmet needs in patients.ConclusionWhile there was an overall consensus on the total needs and met needs between patients and CPs, the level of agreement between the two groups on various items were low. Different perceptions regarding unmet needs were noted between the groups. A holistic approach that takes into account different facets of the needs of patients together with strategic planning to address unmet needs might improve treatment outcomes and satisfaction.</p
    corecore