Measuring persistence of implementation: QUERI Series

As more quality improvement programs are implemented to achieve gains in performance, the need to evaluate their lasting effects has become increasingly evident. However, such long-term follow-up evaluations are scarce in healthcare implementation science, being largely relegated to the "need for further research" section of most project write-ups. This article explores the variety of conceptualizations of implementation sustainability, as well as behavioral and organizational factors that influence the maintenance of gains. It highlights the finer points of design considerations and draws on our own experiences with measuring sustainability, framed within the rich theoretical and empirical contributions of others. In addition, recommendations are made for designing sustainability analyses

Testing the leadership and organizational change for implementation (LOCI) intervention in substance abuse treatment: A cluster randomized trial study protocol

© 2017 The Author(s). Background: Evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation represents a strategic change in organizations that requires effective leadership and alignment of leadership and organizational support across organizational levels. As such, there is a need for combining leadership development with organizational strategies to support organizational climate conducive to EBP implementation. The leadership and organizational change for implementation (LOCI) intervention includes leadership training for workgroup leaders, ongoing implementation leadership coaching, 360° assessment, and strategic planning with top and middle management regarding how they can support workgroup leaders in developing a positive EBP implementation climate. Methods: This test of the LOCI intervention will take place in conjunction with the implementation of motivational interviewing (MI) in 60 substance use disorder treatment programs in California, USA. Participants will include agency executives, 60 program leaders, and approximately 360 treatment staff. LOCI will be tested using a multiple cohort, cluster randomized trial that randomizes workgroups (i.e., programs) within agency to either LOCI or a webinar leadership training control condition in three consecutive cohorts. The LOCI intervention is 12months, and the webinar control intervention takes place in months 1, 5, and 8, for each cohort. Web-based surveys of staff and supervisors will be used to collect data on leadership, implementation climate, provider attitudes, and citizenship. Audio recordings of counseling sessions will be coded for MI fidelity. The unit of analysis will be the workgroup, randomized by site within agency and with care taken that co-located workgroups are assigned to the same condition to avoid contamination. Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) will be used to analyze the data to account for the nested data structure. Discussion: LOCI has been developed to be a feasible and effective approach for organizations to create a positive climate and fertile context for EBP implementation. The approach seeks to cultivate and sustain both effective general and implementation leadership as well as organizational strategies and support that will remain after the study has ended. Development of a positive implementation climate for MI should result in more positive service provider attitudes and behaviors related to the use of MI and, ultimately, higher fidelity in the use of MI. Trial registration: This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT03042832 ), 2 February 2017, retrospectively registered

Parents' perceptions of pediatric day surgery risks: unforeseeable complications, or avoidable mistakes?

A decline in people's trust of the US health care system has been documented. But do parents of pediatric patients have specific safety worries? If so, what are they? And what cultural factors inform them? To help answer these questions, in San Diego 35 English- and Spanish-speaking parents' (or guardians') self-reports of perceptions of their child's risk for experiencing a medical error during day surgery were collected using open-ended rapid assessment interviews, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis methods. (The innovative data collection and analysis protocol is described so as to be easily replicable in other settings for other types of highly focused quality improvement initiatives that rely on the inclusion of parent or patient perspectives and entail limited time and resources). Twelve key themes were identified. Anthropological discourse analysis techniques (modified for rapid use with rapidly collected interview data) were then applied to the transcripts in order to generate ideas regarding cultural factors underlying the themes. Discursive patterns of risk rationalization or refutation related to cultural expectations for parenting, children's bodies, and health care consumerism were found. Neither the (careful, loving, good) parent nor the (wisely chosen or well-reputed) care team was to blame for medical errors. Errors were cast as the inevitable results of latent, unanticipatable vulnerabilities inherent in the (defenseless) children undergoing surgery. The anxiety-generating potential of the surgical consent process also was noted. The implications of the findings for action as well as for theories of risk and vulnerability and of childhood and parenthood are discussed.Risk perception Children Pediatrics Medical error Trust USA Day surgery Safety

Variation in physicians' definitions of the competent parent and other barriers to guideline adherence: the case of pediatric minor head injury management

A lack of consensus regarding the definition of even an everyday term can affect physician adherence to clinical guidelines using that term. We demonstrate this by taking, as an illustrative case, the American Academy of Pediatrics' minor head injury (MHI) management guidelines, which generally recommend at-home observation by a "competent" parent (or the equivalent). The recommendation assumes consensus among physicians as to what parental competence comprises. We systematically examined this assumption. Physicians associated with Children's Hospital, San Diego were mailed a survey asking them to freely list terms defining parental competence. Independent variables were: physician gender, training, specialty, practice location, patient age mix, years in practice, and number of MHI cases seen per year. Dependent variables were: free-list content and length, ease and style of competence decision-making style (e.g., independent or collaborative), familiarity with the guidelines, and likelihood of ordering a computed tomography (CT) scan. Of 112 respondents, 34 (30%) were "not at all" or only "slightly" familiar with the guidelines; 23% (21/112) "frequently" or "sometimes" ordered CTs when the guidelines did not support this. Surgeons were more likely to order discretionary CTs. Office-based, pediatric-trained, and female physicians each found it significantly easier than their counterparts to determine which parents were, in their opinion, competent. Men reported using "objective" criteria significantly less frequently than women. A total of 64 discrete criteria were listed. Individual lists contained an average of 6.5 items. Surgeon's lists were significantly shorter than those of medical physicians. Seven sub-domains of competence were identified. Parental competence is not a unitary construct interpreted similarly by all physicians. Subgroups with distinct models may exist; training and specialization may be key variables. To decrease MHI management variation, guidelines should specify parental competence factors to be considered; they may need to be tailored to different physician subgroups.Decision making Guidelines Brain injuries Computed tomography Pediatrics Child health Physician-patient relations USA

Behind the scenes in health care improvement: The complex structures and emergent strategies of Implementation Science

Implementation Science (IS) is a new branch of health services research (HSR) that strives to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of health care quality improvement (QI) efforts. Despite the fact that IS takes a systems approach, building contextual factors into its research designs, the complex systems context of IS itself--and the impact this context has on IS practice--has never been scrutinized. Using individual interviews and participant observation, the research described here characterizes key contextual factors affecting how implementation scientists in one large health care organization approach and conduct their research. Some of the organizational and professional system forces structuring their attitudes and actions were grant-related timelines, administrative burdens, and team turnover. The need for publications also figured highly. While such pressures (and related responses to them) may be rife in most grant-funded health care research settings, IS's particularly marginal position drove these implementation scientists to strategically highlight particular aspects of their work depending on which audience or part of the system they required favor from. Their narratives illuminate the contradictions and contests entailed within and engendered by organizational and professional structures, and the strategies used to negotiate these. They also reveal a great deal about the struggles underwriting disciplinary identity claims in a complex systems context.USA Implementation science Structure and agency Health Services Research Social construction of knowledge Institutional ethnography

Between 'desperation' and disability rights: a narrative analysis of complementary/alternative medicine use by parents for children with Down syndrome

This paper presents a narrative analysis of complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) use by parents for children with Down syndrome (DS), based on interviews conducted with thirty families. Critics often presume that CAM use for children with developmental disabilities reflects parental desperation in the face of limited biomedical options. Integrating insights from anthropological studies of CAM with narrative analyses in disability studies, we constructively complicate this interpretation in two ways. First, we suggest that the appeal of CAM may lie in its discursive consonance with the broader narrative strategies through which parents construct alternatives to conventional definitions of DS as a condition with a fixed, universal, and essentially pathological course. Second, we submit that the process of seeking and evaluating information about CAM is consonant with how parents construct their identities as 'good' parents through describing their roles as committed advocates and service coordinators for their children. In these ways, CAM can be conceptualized as a new discursive resource that parents engage in their culturally and historically specific efforts to articulate the essential human rights of their children, and to assert the moral soundness of their own parenthood. These findings provide a new conceptualization of parents' motives for choosing CAM, thereby posing new questions for further research about CAM use for developmental disabilities.Complementary/alternative medicine Down syndrome Narrative analysis Disability studies Consumerism USA

Paternal Fears of Childbirth: A Literature Review

To date, most studies on paternal childbirth fears have been exploratory or descriptive, conducted outside of the United States, and focused mainly on White, first-time fathers. Identified fears include harm to the mother or newborn, partner pain, feelings of helplessness, lack of knowledge, and fear of high-risk intervention. Fathers often report that childbirth classes are not helpful and, in some cases, even increase their fears. Some fathers view birth as traumatic, changing their perception of and relationship with their partner. Fathers also voice the need for more information and for reassurance that they are doing the right things for their partner during childbirth. This article summarizes the research findings on paternal childbirth fears and recommends topics for future study