Retrograde Tibiopedal Access as a Bail-Out Procedure for Endovascular Intervention Complications

Introduction. Retrograde pedal access has been well described in the literature as a secondary approach for limb salvage in critical limb ischemia (CLI) patients. In this manuscript we are presenting a case where retrograde tibiopedal access has been used as a bail-out procedure for the management of superficial femoral artery (SFA) intervention complications. Procedure/Technique. After development of a perforation while trying to cross the totally occluded mid SFA using the conventional CFA access, we were able to cross the mid SFA lesion after accessing the posterior tibial artery in a retrograde fashion and delivered a self-expanding stent which created a flap that sealed the perforation without the need for covered stent. Conclusion. Retrograde tibiopedal access is a safe and effective approach for delivery of stents from the distal approach and so can be used as a bail-out technique for SFA perforation

Kissing Balloon Technique for Angioplasty of Tibioperoneal Arteries Bifurcation Using Pedal Arterial Retrograde Revascularization

Background. Kissing Balloon Technique using retrograde pedal approach together with anterograde common femoral artery (CFA) approach could be the treatment of choice in patients with diseased infrapopliteal artery bifurcation. We report seven cases where the KBT was utilized for the treatment of diseased infrapopliteal artery bifurcation using retrograde pedal access in conjunction with the conventional common femoral artery (CFA) access. Methods. We reviewed all seven cases that underwent KBT with the combination of pedal and common femoral access in a single-center study from 2014 to 2015 utilizing Rutherford classification severity index; all cases were deemed stage 3 (severe claudication) to stage 6 (severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene). With the exception of two cases, contralateral femoral access was obtained, with sheath sizes varying from 4 to 6 French for both CFA and pedal access. Ultrasound was utilized for ipsilateral pedal access in all seven cases. Results. Arterial revascularization was successfully achieved by the KBT in all patients without any complications. All patients achieved procedural success, which is defined as residual stenosis of less than 30% with no dissection or thrombosis and clinical success that is defined as resolution of symptoms (absence of intermittent claudication and healing of the ulcer) as well as improvement in the arterial brachial index (ABI). During follow-up, out of the seven cases, repeat angiogram was performed for one case, which showed patent arteries with no residual lesions. Conclusions. In patients with popliteal and tibioperoneal trunk bifurcation lesions, Kissing Balloon Technique using retrograde pedal access in conjunction with the conventional anterograde access appeared to be successful, safe, and effective technique with lower access site complications and shorter procedure time

Retrograde Tibiopedal Access as a Bail-Out Procedure for Endovascular Intervention Complications

Introduction. Retrograde pedal access has been well described in the literature as a secondary approach for limb salvage in critical limb ischemia (CLI) patients. In this manuscript we are presenting a case where retrograde tibiopedal access has been used as a bail-out procedure for the management of superficial femoral artery (SFA) intervention complications. Procedure/Technique. After development of a perforation while trying to cross the totally occluded mid SFA using the conventional CFA access, we were able to cross the mid SFA lesion after accessing the posterior tibial artery in a retrograde fashion and delivered a self-expanding stent which created a flap that sealed the perforation without the need for covered stent. Conclusion. Retrograde tibiopedal access is a safe and effective approach for delivery of stents from the distal approach and so can be used as a bail-out technique for SFA perforation

Prevalence and Risk Factors for the Development of Abdominal Aortic Calcification Among the US Population: NHANES Study

INTRODUCTION: Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) is an important marker of subclinical cardiovascular disease and its prognosis. Advanced age, hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and higher truncal fat are known markers of AAC in studies conducted around the world. However, literature for these risk factors and their co-occurrence is limited in the US. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used data from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (Hologic, v4.0) to detect the occurrence of AAC in a sample population ( RESULTS: We found the national prevalence of AAC in the US to be 28.8%. After adjusting for confounders, persons with hypertension: OR = 1.66 (95% CI: 1.30-2.13) and smokers: OR = 1.63 (95% CI: 1.24-2.14) were more likely to have AAC compared to their respective counterparts. Increasing age was positively associated with AAC: OR = 1.06 (95% CI: 1.04-1.08). There was a statistically significant negative association between body mass index (BMI) and AAC, more so in smokers than in non-smokers: OR = 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94-0.97). We did not observe any statistically significant association between diabetes and AAC. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced age, smoking, and hypertension was associated with increased occurrence of AAC. Paradoxically, increasing BMI was inversely associated with AAC and there was no statistically significant association between total body and trunk fat percentages and AAC. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to establish the nationwide prevalence and associated factors in the US

Determining the Safety of Radiofrequency Ablation in Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is an effective treatment for arrhythmias. The effects of RFCA on cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) function have varied. We aim to study the effect of RFCA on device parameters and clinical outcomes in patients with CIED. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study between 2011 and 2018. Generator and lead parameters were compared pre- and post-ablation using paired sample t-test. The median follow-up interval for documentation of procedure-related complications and clinical outcomes was 8 weeks. We identified 119 eligible patients; whose mean age was 64.5 ± 11.91 years and 22 (18.4%) were females. Types of CIED include single-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (8.93%), dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (41.96%), and either dual-chamber or biventricular pacemakers (44.54%). Arrhythmias for which patients underwent RFCA include atrial fibrillation/atrial tachycardia (15.22%), atrial flutter (38.14%), atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia (13.56%), and premature ventricular complex or ventricular tachycardia (20.34%). No statistically significant difference was observed in pre- and post-ablation: (1) atrial sensing thresholds, pacing thresholds, lead impedance; (2) right ventricle sensing and pacing thresholds; and (3) left ventricle pacing threshold and impedance. A decrease in right ventricle impedance after ablation (549.77 ± 173 ohm vs 507.40 ± 129.0 ohm, P-valu