A Proposed Pathway For The Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis: Experience From a District General Hospital in The United Kingdom

Introduction: Giant Cell arteritis can be difficult to diagnose clinically. In those cases, where there is no certainty, there is more reliance on a temporal artery biopsy and radiological imaging to confirm the diagnosis. The purpose of this article was to identify the standard of care in individuals with suspected Giant Cell Arteritis in a typical district general hospital and to offer a proposed pathway for treatment. Methods: Darent Valley Hospital has been managing Giant Cell Arteritis for many years but there has always been a need for an outlined pathway to identify those at risk of cranial complications like visual loss to improve patient care. We evaluated the management of 70 individuals that had a temporal artery biopsy and followed their treatment journey. We extracted clinical specialist, emergency admission, operation theatre and histological data. We collected clinic follow up data over the following years to identify those that relapsed on treatment, stayed in remission or had complications. We propose a pathway to manage those individuals with Giant Cell arteritis in line with the new advances in treatment. Results: Ten patients were identified that had a histologically positive biopsy. Reassuringly, most individuals with an obvious clinical diagnosis had high dose glucocorticoid treatment commenced before even being referred for a biopsy. Nine individuals had visual ischemia out of which five lost their vision. Conclusion: The presentation of a pathway will help streamline best medical and surgical practice and ensure the availability of urgent specialist treatment and to identify those at risk of ischemic complications. (Raza M, El Miedany Y. A Proposed Pathway For The Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis: Experience From a District General Hospital in The United Kingdom. SEEMEDJ 2018; 2(2); 34-47

Consensus evidence-based clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and treat-to-target management of osteoporosis in chronic kidney disease stages G4-G5D and post-transplantation: An initiative of Egyptian Academy of Bone Health

The aim of this study was to reach a consensus on an updated version of the recommendations for the diagnosis and Treat-to-Target management of osteoporosis that is effective and safe for individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) G4-G5D/kidney transplant. Delphi process was implemented (3 rounds) to establish a consensus on 10 clinical domains: (1) study targets, (2) risk factors, (3) diagnosis, (4) case stratification, (5) treatment targets, (6) investigations, (7) medical management, (8) monitoring, (9) management of special groups, (10) fracture liaison service. After each round, statements were retired, modified, or added in view of the experts' suggestions, and the percent agreement was calculated. Statements receiving rates of 7-9 by more than 75% of experts' votes were considered as achieving consensus. The surveys were sent to an expert panel ( = 26), of whom 23 participated in the three rounds (2 were international experts and 21 were national). Most of the participants were rheumatologists (87%), followed by nephrologists (8.7%), and geriatric physicians (4.3%). Eighteen recommendations, categorized into 10 domains, were obtained. Agreement with the recommendations (rank 7-9) ranged from 80 to 100%. Consensus was reached on the wording of all 10 clinical domains identified by the scientific committee. An algorithm for the management of osteoporosis in CKD has been suggested. A panel of international and national experts established a consensus regarding the management of osteoporosis in CKD patients. The developed recommendations provide a comprehensive approach to assessing and managing osteoporosis for all healthcare professionals involved in its management. [Abstract copyright: Copyright © 2022 by The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Defining criteria for disease activity states in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis based on the systemic Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score

Objective To develop and validate cutoff values in the systemic Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score 10 (sJADAS10) that distinguish the states of inactive disease (ID), minimal disease activity (MiDA), moderate disease activity (MoDA), and high disease activity (HDA) in children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), based on subjective disease state assessment by the treating pediatric rheumatologist. Methods The cutoffs definition cohort was composed of 400 patients enrolled at 30 pediatric rheumatology centers in 11 countries. Using the subjective physician rating as an external criterion, 6 methods were applied to identify the cutoffs: mapping, calculation of percentiles of cumulative score distribution, Youden index, 90% specificity, maximum agreement, and ROC curve analysis. Sixty percent of the patients were assigned to the definition cohort and 40% to the validation cohort. Cutoff validation was conducted by assessing discriminative ability. Results The sJADAS10 cutoffs that separated ID from MiDA, MiDA from MoDA, and MoDA from HDA were ≤ 2.9, ≤ 10, and > 20.6. The cutoffs discriminated strongly among different levels of pain, between patients with or without morning stiffness, and between patients whose parents judged their disease status as remission or persistent activity/flare or were satisfied or not satisfied with current illness outcome. Conclusion The sJADAS cutoffs revealed good metrologic properties in both definition and validation cohorts, and are therefore suitable for use in clinical trials and routine practice