Evidence from bilateral recordings of sympathetic nerve activity for lateralisation of vestibular contributions to cardiovascular control

Using low-frequency (0.08-0.18 Hz) sinusoidal galvanic vestibular stimulation (sGVS), we recently showed that two peaks of modulation of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and skin sympathetic nerve activity (SSNA) occurred for each cycle of stimulation: a large peak associated with the positive peak of the sinusoid (defined as the primary peak) and a smaller peak (defined as the secondary peak) related to the negative peak of the sinusoid. However, these recordings were only made from the left common peroneal nerve, so to investigate lateralisation of vestibulosympathetic reflexes, concurrent recordings were made from both sides of the body. Tungsten microelectrodes were inserted into muscle or cutaneous fascicles of the left and right common peroneal nerves in 17 healthy individuals. Bipolar binaural sinusoidal GVS (±2 mA, 100 cycles) was applied to the mastoid processes at 0.08 Hz. Cross-correlation analysis revealed that vestibular modulation of MSNA (10 bilateral recordings) and SSNA (6 bilateral recordings) on the left side was expressed as a primary peak related to the positive phase of the sinusoid and a secondary peak related to the negative phase of the sinusoid. Conversely, on the right side, the primary and secondary peaks were reversed: the secondary peak on the right coincided with the primary peak on the left and vice versa. Moreover, differences in pattern of outflow were apparent across sides. We believe the results support the conclusion that the left and right vestibular nuclei send both an ipsilateral and contralateral projection to the left and right medullary output nuclei from which MSNA and SSNA originate. This causes a “flip-flop” patterning between the two sympathetic outflows: when vestibular modulation of a burst is high on the left, it is low on the right, and when modulation is low on the left, it is high on the right

Blood pressure reactivity at onset of mental stress determines sympathetic vascular response in young adults

We have previously shown in young males that the rate of rise in blood pressure (BP) at the onset of mental stress determines whether or not muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) has a role in driving the pressor response. The aim of this study was to investigate these interactions in young females. BP and MSNA were recorded continuously in 19 females and 21 males during 2‐min mental stressors (mental arithmetic and Stroop test). Physical stressor tasks (cold pressor, handgrip exercise, postexercise ischemia) were also performed. During the first minute of mental arithmetic, the rate of rise in mean arterial pressure (MAP) was significantly greater in negative responders (mean decrease in MSNA) compared with positive responders (mean increase in MSNA) in both males (1.9 ± 0.7 vs. 0.7 ± 0.3 mmHg/sec) and females (1.0 ± 0.3 vs. 0.5 ± 0.2 mmHg/sec). For the Stroop test, there was no significant difference in the rate of the rise in BP between positive and negative responders (P > 0.05). However, peak changes in MAP were significantly greater in negative responders compared with positive responders in both males (22 ± 6 vs. 13 ± 3 mmHg) and females (12 ± 2 vs. 6 ± 1 mmHg). Sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity was greater in negative responders and may contribute to the fall in MSNA experienced by these individuals during mental stress. During physical stressors there were consistent increases in BP and MSNA in males and females. The findings suggest that, in both males and females, BP reactivity at the onset of mental stress dictates whether or not there is an increase or decrease in MSNA

Rate of rise in diastolic blood pressure influences vascular sympathetic response to mental stress

Research indicates that individuals may experience a rise (positive responders) or fall (negative responders) in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) during mental stress. The aim was to examine the early blood pressure response to stress in positive and negative responders and thus its influence on the direction of change in MSNA. Blood pressure and MSNA were recorded continuously in 21 healthy young males during 2 min mental stressors (mental arithmetic, Stroop test) and physical stressors (cold pressor, handgrip exercise, post-exercise ischaemia). Participants were classified as negative or positive responders according to the direction of the mean change in MSNA during the stressor tasks. The peak changes, time of peak and rate of changes in blood pressure were compared between groups. During mental arithmetic negative responders experienced a significantly greater rate of rise in diastolic blood pressure in the first minute of the task (1.3 ± 0.5 mmHg s−1) compared with positive responders (0.4 ± 0.1 mmHg s−1; P = 0.03). Similar results were found for the Stroop test. Physical tasks elicited robust parallel increases in blood pressure and MSNA across participants. It is concluded that negative MSNA responders to mental stress exhibit a more rapid rise in diastolic pressure at the onset of the stressor, suggesting a baroreflex-mediated suppression of MSNA. In positive responders there is a more sluggish rise in blood pressure during mental stress, which appears to be MSNA-driven. This study suggests that whether MSNA has a role in the pressor response is dependent upon the reactivity of blood pressure early in the task

Muscle sympathetic nerve activity peaks in the first trimester in healthy pregnancy : a longitudinal case study

Objective and methods Muscle sympathetic nerve activity and baroreflex sensitivity were examined at rest before, during (weeks 6, 11, 17, 22, 25, 33 and 36) and after a normotensive pregnancy. Results Muscle sympathetic nerve activity is elevated during pregnancy with a large peak in the first trimester (∆17 bursts/min) and a secondary peak in the third trimester (∆11 bursts/min). Cardiac baroreflex sensitivity peaked in the first trimester (10 vs. 6 ms/mmHg pre-pregnancy), whereas sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity was greater throughout. Interpretation The increase in sympathetic outflow early in pregnancy cannot be explained by a reduction in baroreflex sensitivity, while the secondary increase in burst frequency in the third trimester may, in part, be explained by the elevated heart rate

Relationship between spontaneous sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity and cardiac baroreflex sensitivity in healthy young individuals

Low baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) is associated with elevated cardiovascular risk. However, the evidence is based primarily on measurements of cardiac BRS. It cannot be assumed that cardiac or sympathetic BRS alone represent a true reflection of baroreflex control of blood pressure. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between spontaneous sympathetic and cardiac BRS in healthy, young individuals. Continuous measurements of blood pressure, heart rate, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) were made under resting conditions in 50 healthy individuals (18–28 years). Sympathetic BRS was quantified by plotting MSNA burst incidence against diastolic pressure (sympathetic BRSinc), and by plotting total MSNA against diastolic pressure (sympathetic BRStotal). Cardiac BRS was quantified by plotting R‐R interval against systolic pressure using the sequence method. Significant sympathetic BRSinc and cardiac BRS slopes were obtained for 42 participants. A significant positive correlation was found between sympathetic BRSinc and cardiac BRS (r = 0.31, P = 0.049). Among this group, significant sympathetic baroreflex slopes were obtained for 39 participants when plotting total MSNA against diastolic pressure. In this subset, a significant positive correlation was observed between sympathetic BRStotal and cardiac BRS (r = 0.40, P = 0.012). When males and females were assessed separately, these modest relationships only remained significant in females. Analysis by gender revealed correlations in the females between sympathetic BRSinc and cardiac BRS (r = 0.49, P = 0.062), and between sympathetic BRStotal and cardiac BRS (r = 0.57, P = 0.025). These findings suggest that gender interactions exist in baroreflex control of blood pressure, and that cardiac BRS is not appropriate for estimating overall baroreflex function in healthy, young populations. This relationship warrants investigation in aging and clinical populations