Corrigendum to: Preventive Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients with Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy: Meta-analysis of Randomised Trials

n/

Results of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in hypertrophied hearts – Comparison between primary and secondary hypertrophy

AbstractBackground and purposeApproximately 20–25% of the patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) develop atrial fibrillation (AF) during the clinical course of the disease, a percentage significantly larger than that of the general population. The purpose of the present study was to report on the procedural results of patients with AF and either primary or secondary left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH).Methods and subjectsTwenty-two consecutive HCM patients (55% male, mean age 57±8 years) with symptomatic AF, having undergone AF ablation procedures between September 2009 and July 2012 were compared with respect to procedural outcome and follow-up characteristics with 22 matched controls with secondary cardiac hypertrophy (64% male, 63±10 years) from our prospective AF catheter ablation registry.Results and conclusionRadiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) was successful in restoring long-term sinus rhythm in patients with LVH due to HCM and due to secondary etiology. However, patients with HCM needed more RFCA procedures and frequently additional antiarrhythmic drug therapy in order to maintain sinus rhythm

Wide antral circumferential vs. ostial pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation—the butterfly effect

BackgroundWide antral circumferential ablation (WACA) in comparison to ostial pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) has been attributed with improved rhythm outcome. We investigated the feasibility, lesion formation, and rhythm outcome of WACA-PVI in comparison to ostial-PVI using pulsed field ablation (PFA).MethodsSymptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients (69 years, 67% male; 67% paroxysmal AF) were prospectively enrolled into our single-center registry and underwent first-time ostial-PFA or WACA-PFA, N = 15 each. In all patients, eight pulse trains (2 kV/2.5 s, bipolar, biphasic, 4× basket/flower configuration each) were delivered to each PV. In WACA-PFA, two extra pulse trains in a flower configuration were added to the anterior and posterior antrum of the PVs. For comparison of PFA lesion size, pre- and post-ablation left atrial (LA) voltage maps were acquired using a multipolar spiral catheter together with a three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system.ResultsWACA-PFA resulted in a significant larger lesion formation than ostial-PFA (45.5 vs. 35.1 cm2, p = 0.001) with bilateral overlapping butterfly shape-like lesions and concomitant posterior LA wall isolation in 73% of patients. This was not associated with increased procedure time, sedation dosage, or exposure to radiation. One-year freedom from AF recurrence was numerically higher after WACA-PFA than ostial-PFA (94% vs. 87%) but not statistically significant (p = 0.68). No organized atrial tachycardias (ATs) were observed. Ostial-PFA patients more often underwent re-ablation due to recurrent AF episodes.ConclusionWACA-PFA is feasible and resulted in significantly wider lesion sets than ostial-PFA. Concomitant posterior LA wall isolation occurred as an epiphenomenon in the majority of patients. The WACA approach was associated with neither increased procedure and fluoroscopy times nor statistically significant differences in 1-year rhythm outcome. ATs were absent