12 research outputs found

    Mitochondrial polymorphisms were analyzed in PLINK for allelic association with 50,000 case-control permutations to obtain empirical p-values.

    No full text
    <p>The number of individuals with mtDNA alleles shown in the far right columns is from the Ingman mt database (URL <a href="http://www.genpat.uu.se/mtDB/" target="_blank">http://www.genpat.uu.se/mtDB/</a>). A preliminary odds-ratio was calculated by comparing the affected allele frequency to the Ingman database <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0004913#pone.0004913-Ingman1" target="_blank">[80]</a>. All case-control differences were either in the control region, or a synonymous substitution in the third position in coding regions.</p

    Demographics of subjects from which DLPFC mtDNA was resequenced.

    No full text
    <p>All subjects had a rapid death and absence of prolonged hypoxia prior to death. An increased pH was found in MDD compared to the C group. Subjects with SZ died at younger age than C subjects. The Ct for extracted DNA was measured by qPCR for genomic DNA and was similar between groups.</p

    The super haplogroup (U, K, UK) showed a shift in postmortem brain pH, and this finding was significant following permutation analysis.

    No full text
    <p>The histogram shows the frequency of the pH (bars) for the super haplogroup (red) compared to all other matrilineages (blue). The accumulated percentage (right y-axis) is shown as two lines with the super haplogroup (red line) and all other matrilineages (blue line). There were no subjects with a prolonged death, or agonal factors as rated according to the Hardy <i>et al.</i> scale <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0004913#pone.0004913-Wester1" target="_blank">[98]</a>. PMI differences did not account for this significant effect, as PMI was equivalent between the super haplogroup and other haplogroups.</p

    Transition/transversion bias calculation for mtDNA coding sequences shows difference between SZ and control group substitution.

    No full text
    *<p><i>R</i> = [A*G*<i>k<sub>1</sub></i>+T*C*<i>k<sub>2</sub></i>]/[(A+G)*(T+C)]. Codon positions included were 1st+2nd+3rd. All calculations were conducted in MEGA4 <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0004913#pone.0004913-Tamura1" target="_blank">[84]</a>.</p><p>This result is consistent with the increased synonymous substitution rate in SZ shown in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0004913#pone-0004913-t004" target="_blank">Table 4</a>.</p
    corecore