9 research outputs found

    Humans and elephants as treefall drivers in African savannas

    Get PDF
    Humans have played a major role in altering savanna structure and function, and growing land-use pressure will only increase their influence on woody cover. Yet humans are often overlooked as ecological components. Both humans and the African elephant Loxodonta africana alter woody vegetation in savannas through removal of large trees and activities that may increase shrub cover. Interactive effects of both humans and elephants with fire may also alter vegetation structure and composition. Here we capitalize on a macroscale experimental opportunity – brought about by the juxtaposition of an elephant-mediated landscape, human-utilized communal harvesting lands and a nature reserve fenced off from both humans and elephants – to investigate the influence of humans and elephants on height-specific treefall dynamics. We surveyed 6812 ha using repeat, airborne high resolution Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) to track the fate of 453 685 tree canopies over two years. Human-mediated biennial treefall rates were 2–3.5 fold higher than the background treefall rate of 1.5% treefall ha–1, while elephant-mediated treefall rates were 5 times higher at 7.6% treefall ha–1 than the control site. Model predictors of treefall revealed that human or elephant presence was the most important variable, followed by the interaction between geology and fire frequency. Treefall patterns were spatially heterogeneous with elephant-driven treefall associated with geology and surface water, while human patterns were related to perceived ease of access to wood harvesting areas and settlement expansion. Our results show humans and elephants utilize all height classes of woody vegetation, and that large tree shortages in a heavily utilized communal land has transferred treefall occurrence to shorter vegetation. Elephant- and human-dominated landscapes are tied to interactive effects that may hinder tree seedling survival which, combined with tree loss in the landscape, may compromise woodland sustainability.Andrew Mellon Foundation; Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) Strategic Research Panel; Dept of Science and Technology (DST); Avatar Alliance Foundation; Margaret A. Cargill Foundation; David and Lucile Packard Foundation; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation; Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment; W. M. Keck Foundation; John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation; Exxaro Chairman's Fund; Applied Centre for Climate and Earth System Science; DST/NRF Centre of Excellence in Tree Health Biotechnology; NRF Innovation Scholarship [UID: 95030].http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1600-05872018-11-30hj2017Geography, Geoinformatics and Meteorolog

    Fuelwood extraction intensity drives compensatory regrowth in African savanna communal lands

    Get PDF
    Woody biomass remains the primary energy source for domestic use in the developing world, raising concerns about woodland sustainability. Yet woodland regenerative capacity and the adaptive response of harvesters to localised fuelwood shortages are often underestimated or unaccounted for in fuelwood supply–demand models. Here, we explore the rates and patterns of height‐specific woody vegetation structural dynamics in three communal lands in a semiarid savanna in South Africa. Using repeat, airborne light detection and ranging, we measured height‐specific change in woody vegetation structure, and the relative influence of geology, fire, and ease of access to fuelwood. Monitoring 634,284 trees canopies over 4 years revealed high compensatory growth, particularly in the high wood extraction communal land: 34.1% of trees increased in height >1 m. Vegetation structural patterns were associated with ease of access to the communal land but were mediated by wood extraction intensity. In these communal lands, vegetation structural dynamics show rapid woody thickening as a response to repeat harvesting. However, loss of height in vegetation structure did not follow a gradient of wood extraction intensity. We propose a conceptual framework to better understand change in vegetation structural metrics and the paradoxical phenomenon of high growth in high wood extraction scenarios. We also show coadaptive responses of humans and woody vegetation to fuelwood harvesting in human–environment systems through patterns of regrowth response relative to ease of access to fuelwood resources.LiDAR data collection was funded by the Andrew Mellon Foundation, the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) Strategic Research Panel and the Department of Science and Technology (DST). The CAO has been made possible by grants and donations from the Avatar Alliance Foundation, Margaret A. Cargill Foundation, David and Lucile Packard Foundation, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment, W. M. Keck Foundation, John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Andrew Mellon Foundation, Mary Anne Nyburg Baker and G. Leonard Baker Jr, and William R. Hearst III. B. F. N. E. is supported by the Exxaro Chairman's Fund. P. J. M. is funded by the DST/NRF Centre of Excellence in Tree Health Biotechnology and an NRF Innovation Scholarship (grant UID: 95030).http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-145X2020-01-30hj2018Geography, Geoinformatics and Meteorolog

    Bridging the knowing–doing gap in South Africa and the role of environmental volunteer groups

    No full text
    The implementation gap between science, policy and practice has led to loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services throughout Africa and is described in a case study from Limpopo Province, South Africa. In 2006, the South African National Biodiversity Institute first highlighted the Woodbush Granite Grassland (WGG) in the Greater Tzaneen Local Municipality as the only Critically Endangered ecosystem in Limpopo Province. Five years later (2011), the Critically Endangered listing was published in the Government Gazette No. 34809. After repeated and sustained efforts for many years from volunteers of a local environmental group – currently known as the Friends of the Haenertsburg Grassland (FroHG) – in 2015 the intent to formally protect 126 ha was published in the Government Gazette No. 2609. Unfortunately, the proposed protected area accounts for only 66% of the largest remaining fragment of WGG, which excludes an important colony of medicinal plants. Considering that only 6% of the original extent of WGG remains in an untransformed state the whole fragment should be conserved. Non-alignment of municipal spatial priorities, as in the Haenertsburg town plan from 1896, to provincial and national environmental priorities has resulted in numerous incidents that have degraded what little remains of the WGG ecosystem. Failure of the provincial authorities to act timeously to enforce environmental regulations resulted in the FroHG successfully involving national authorities to stop illegal land occupation while another incident involving an illegal fence was resolved 9 years after erection. A strengthened relationship with Lepelle Northern Water has resulted in better planning of activities in relation to an existing pipeline. This case study shows various avenues available to environmental volunteer groups in South Africa and suggests that long-term lobbying can yield positive results. Conservation implications: Formal conservation of WGG through the intended nature reserve proclamation represents application of environmental legislation (notably Listing Notice 3, National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998: Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2014), scientific recommendations and policy. Better cooperation between provincial administration and FroHG will benefit the protection and management of WGG

    Temporal partitioning of diurnal bird and nocturnal small mammal visitors to a winter flowering endemic succulent

    No full text
    Floral nectar is an important attractant and reward for visitors, and is often produced in synchrony with peak activity of pollinators. Aloe peglerae flowers in winter, and previous studies have shown that it is pollinated primarily by diurnal generalist birds, with small mammals making additional contributions to pollination at night. Nectar produced during the day is the main attractant and reward for birds, but the nectar rewards available to small mammals are unknown. This paper investigates nectar availability in Aloe peglerae, because small  mammals may be feeding on remaining, or freshly produced, nectar at night. Nectar availability over a 24-hour period was measured in screened and unscreened plants (n = ten plants per treatment), and the associated partitioning of visits by diurnal birds and nocturnal small mammals assessed. Nectar is constantly available over 24-hours, but in different quantities. Nectar volume of screened (nectar availability) and unscreened (standing crop) plants, is significantly higher early in the morning after sunrise, compared with all other  sampling periods during the 24-hour period. Nectar concentration did not vary over 24-hours, averaging 11.5 ± 0.4% w/w (unscreened)  across the entire 24-hour period. Peaks in visits by different guilds occurred at periods (i.e. diurnal birds and nocturnal small mammals) when nectar availability was high. Aloe peglerae has higher daytime nectar production, when its primary pollinators are most active, but the continual, albeit reduced, nectar availability at night attracts small mammals. Mobile diurnal birds, and less-mobile nocturnal small  mammals, both rely on this nectar resource during dry and cold South African winters and, in turn, are important pollinators for this  Critically Endangered Aloe species. Keywords: Aloe peglerae, bird pollination, nectar availability, small mammal pollination, temporal partitionin

    Does allelopathy explain the invasiveness of Campuloclinium macrocephalum (pompom weed) in the South African grassland biome?

    Get PDF
    Campuloclinium macrocephalum is an Asteraceous alien weed that invades roadside vegetation and grassland in South Africa. The role of allelopathy and competition in its invasiveness was investigated using Eragrostis curvula (weeping lovegrass, an indigenous grass), E. tef and Lactuca sativa (lettuce) as test species. Trials were conducted in Petri-dishes, pots and in the field. Root and shoot extracts of adult C. macrocephalum plants did not inhibit seed germination in any test species. The greatest effect was radicle stunting produced by leaf extracts at 10 and 25% w/v. Eragrostis curvula was less tolerant of the extracts than E. tef. Allelopathic effects could however not be confirmed in pot trials evaluating the interference potential of the weed or weed residue effects against E. curvula. E. curvula growth and biomass was not affected by plant densities of one or five C. macrocephalum per pot, whereas C. macrocephalum suffered a 17% mortality and density-dependant trade-offs of size and biomass for survival. Under field conditions C. macrocephalum had a broader ecological niche than E. curvula, invading hygrophilous and undisturbed grasslands not amenable for E. curvula establishment, this included well drained disturbed soils on which the latter proliferated. Evidence of competitive exclusion of E. curvula by C. macrocephalum or vice versa was not detected. The coexistence of both species irrespective of relative density suggested these species have different resource requirements. Allelopathy was not an adequate causal mechanism to explain invasiveness in Campuloclinium macrocephalum. A more traditional hypothesis such as the absence of natural enemies, at this stage, better justifies the weed’s invasion success

    The impact of elephants (Loxodonta africana) on the Baobab (Adansonia digitata) in a semi-arid savanna

    No full text
    The impacts of the expanding African elephant (Loxodonta africana) population in southern Africa leads to a shift in savanna vegetation community composition and structure. However, little has been done to understand the effect of elephants on the structure of keystone tree species like the baobab. We sampled two protected areas in Southeast lowveld of Zimbabwe to quantify the impact of elephants on the baobab (Adansonia digitata L.), one area with elephants (Save Valley Conservancy: SVC) and the other without elephants (Chipinge Safari Area: CSA). Data on elephant damage, baobab density, and structural variables (tree height, stem basal area, and canopy cover) were collected in seven 1 km2 plots. Baobab damage was classed into four categories, i) new, ii) old, iii) very old, and iv) none, to have a time series interpretation. Distances of every baobab tree from spatial variables, nearest management road, perennial water source and conservancy boundary were measured. Baobabs in the absence of elephants (CSA) were taller with higher basal area and canopy cover than those where elephants were present (SVC). Although SVC baobabs had smaller structural variables compared with CSA, their density was much higher 1.69 ha-1 compared with 0.94 ha-1 for CSA. More baobabs in the smaller size classes for SVC suggests that recruitment was higher than CSA. No elephant damage was observed in the CSA although 23 % of baobabs showed signs of very old harvesting of bark by humans. All trees in SVC showed signs of elephant damage in either trunks or canopies, with most of damage classed as very old. Baobab damage decreased with distance from roads and perennial water sources while it increased with distance from conservancy boundary. Our results demonstrate that elephants have a great impact on baobab structure but not necessarily recruitment as indicated by the presence of some baobabs in smaller size classes, suggesting that other factors may be more important in determining recruitment of this keystone species

    Misinterpretation of why black students do not pursue studies in the biological sciences

    No full text
    This Commentary is a response to a Commentary published in the May/June 2020 issue: Nattrass N. Why are black South African students less likely to consider studying biological sciences? S Afr J Sci. 2020;116(5/6), Art. #7864, 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2020/7864 Responses to the Commentary in the May/June 2020 issue have been published collectively in a special issue of Volume 116
    corecore