Chronic anticoagulation is not associated with a reduced risk of acute kidney injury in hospitalised Covid-19 patients

From Springer Nature via Jisc Publications RouterHistory: received 2020-12-23, accepted 2021-04-26, registration 2021-06-10, pub-electronic 2021-06-16, online 2021-06-16, collection 2021-12Publication status: PublishedAbstract: Background: Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) has been declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organisation. Severe disease typically presents with respiratory failure but Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) and a hypercoagulable state can also occur. Early reports suggest that thrombosis may be linked with AKI. We studied the development of AKI and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 taking chronic anticoagulation therapy. Methods: Electronic records were reviewed for all adult patients admitted to Manchester University Foundation Trust Hospitals between March 10 and April 302,020 with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Patients with end-stage kidney disease were excluded. AKI was classified as per KDIGO criteria. Results: Of the 1032 patients with COVID-19 studied,164 (15.9%) were taking anticoagulant therapy prior to admission. There were similar rates of AKI between those on anticoagulants and those not anticoagulated (23.8% versus 19.7%) with no difference in the severity of AKI or requirement of renal replacement therapy between groups (1.2% versus 3.5%). Risk factors for AKI included hypertension, pre-existing renal disease and male sex. There was a higher mortality in those taking anticoagulant therapy (40.2% versus 30%). Patients taking anticoagulants were less likely to be admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (8.5% versus 17.4%) and to receive mechanical ventilation (42.9% versus 78.1%). Conclusion: Patients on chronic anticoagulant therapy did not have a reduced incidence or severity of AKI suggesting that AKI is unlikely to be thrombotic in nature. Therapeutic anticoagulation is currently still under investigation in randomised controlled studies to determine whether it has a potential role in COVID-19 treatment

Neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers - evidence-to-practice

Foot ulcers and their attendant complications are disquietingly high in people with diabetes, a majority of whom have underlying neuropathy. This review examines the evidence base underpinning the prevention and management of neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers in order to inform best clinical practice. Since it may be impractical to ask patients not to weight-bear at all, relief of pressure through the use of offloading casting devices remains the mainstay for management of neuropathic ulcers, whilst provision of appropriate footwear is essential in ulcer prevention. Simple non-surgical debridement and application of hydrogels are both effective in preparing the wound bed for healthy granulation and therefore enhancing healing. Initial empirical antibiotic therapy for infected ulcers should cover the most common bacterial flora. There is limited evidence supporting the use of adjunctive therapies such as hyperbaric oxygen and cytokines or growth factors. In selected cases, recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor has been shown to enhance healing; however, its widespread use cannot be advised due to the availability of more cost-effective approaches. While patient education may be beneficial, the evidence base remains thin and conflicting. In conclusion, best management of foot ulcers is achieved by what is taken out of the foot (pressure, callus, infection, and slough) rather than what is put on the foot (adjuvant treatment)

A modified in vivo flow variation technique of microdialysis for sampling uremic toxins in the subcutaneous interstitial compartment

&lt;i&gt;Background:&lt;/i&gt; Uremic toxins are typically measured in plasma and little is known of their interstitial concentrations. We undertook experiments to validate a microdialysis technique for simultaneous recovery of small and large uremic toxins in the subcutaneous interstitial fluid (ISF). &lt;i&gt;Methods:&lt;/i&gt; Microdialysis catheters were inserted into the subcutaneous interstitium of 8 subjects (controls and uremic patients) and perfused using two different solutions at incremental flow rates to determine analyte recovery and ISF concentrations of urea and protein. &lt;i&gt;Results:&lt;/i&gt; 10% dextran-40 perfusate allowed the determination of interstitial concentrations of urea and protein reliably, by virtue of the exponential decay of their concentrations in the microdialysate with incremental flow rates (R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 0.63–0.99). Interstitial and plasma urea correlated well (r = 0.95), as did interstitial urea from distant anatomical sites (r = 0.96). &lt;i&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/i&gt; Cutaneous microdialysis with dextran-40 allows measurement of small and large molecule concentrations in ISF, creating an opportunity to characterize ISF in uremia.</jats:p